Supremacy Logo

British Research Tree

Militia:

  1. 1932
  2. 1934
  3. 1936
  4. 1938
  5. 1940
  6. 1942
  7. Elite 1942
Infantry:

  1. 1932
  2. 1934
  3. 1938
  4. 1942
  5. 1946
  6. Elite 1946
Motorized Infantry:

  1. 1938
  2. 1941
  3. 1944
  4. 1947
  5. 1950
  6. Elite 1950
Mechanized Infantry:

  1. 1944
  2. 1946
  3. 1948
  4. 1950
  5. 1952
  6. Elite 1952
Armored Cars:

  1. Lanchester Mk I
  2. Guy Mk I
  3. Daimler Mk II
  4. Coventry Mk II
  5. Elite Coventry Mk II
Light Tanks:

  1. Carden Loyd Mk VI
  2. Light Tank Mk VI
  3. Tetrarch Mk VII
  4. Harry Hopkins Mk VIII
  5. Elite Harry Hopkins Mk VIII
Medium Tanks:

  1. Cruiser Mk IV
  2. Crusader III
  3. Mk VIII Cromwell
  4. Comet Tank
  5. Centurion
  6. Elite Centurion
Heavy Tanks:

  1. Mk IV Churchill
  2. Black Prince Tank
  3. Conqueror Mk I
  4. Elite Conqueror Mk
Tank Destroyers:

  1. Deacon
  2. Achilles
  3. Archer
  4. Churchill 3-inch Gun Carrier
  5. Elite Churchill 3-inch Gun Carrier
Anti-Tank:

  1. Ordnance QF 2-pounder
  2. Ordnance QF 6-pounder
  3. Ordnance QF 17-pounder
  4. Ordnance QF 20-Pounder
  5. Ordnance QF 32-Pounder
  6. Elite Ordnance QF 32-Pounder
Artillery:

  1. Ordnance BL 60-pounder
  2. BL 8-inch howitzer Mk VIII
  3. BL 4.5-inch Medium Field Gun
  4. BL 7.2-inch howitzer Mk VI
  5. Ordnance QF 25-pounder
  6. Elite Ordnance QF 25-Pounder
SP Artillery:

  1. Birch Gun
  2. Bishop
  3. Sexton II
  4. Elite Sexton II
Anti-Air

  1. 20 mm Oerlikon
  2. 40 mm Bofors
  3. QF 3-inch 20-cwt
  4. QF 3.7-inch AA gun
  5. QF 4.5-Inch
  6. Elite QF 4.5-Inch
SP Anti Air:

  1. Mounted QF 3-inch Gun
  2. Mounted QF 13-pounder
  3. AA Mk III
  4. Elite AA Mk III
Interceptor:

  1. Gloster Gladiator
  2. Hawker Hurricane
  3. Supermarine Spitfire
  4. Hawker Tempest
  5. Gloster Meteor
  6. de Havilland Vampire
  7. Elite de Havilland Vampire
Tactical Bomber:

  1. Hawker Hind
  2. Fairey Battle
  3. Bristol Blenheim
  4. Bristol Beaufighter
  5. De Havilland Mosquito
  6. English Electric Canberra
  7. Elite English Electric Canberra
Strategic Bomber:

  1. Armstrong Whitworth Whitley
  2. Vickers Wellington
  3. Short Stirling
  4. Avro Lancaster
  5. Avro Lincoln
  6. Handley Page Victor
  7. Elite Handley Page Victor
Naval Bomber:

  1. Fairey Swordfish
  2. Fairey Albacore
  3. Blackburn B-24 Skua
  4. Fairey Barracuda
  5. Fairey Firefly
  6. Westland Wyvern
  7. Elite Westland Wyvern
Destroyer:

  1. 'A' Class
  2. 'C' Class
  3. 'E' Class
  4. 'G' Class
  5. 'K' Class
  6. Tribal Class
  7. Elite Tribal Class
Submarine:

  1. S Class
  2. River Class
  3. Grampus Class
  4. Parthian Class
  5. U Class
  6. V Class
  7. Elite V Class
Cruiser:

  1. Leander Class
  2. Arethusa Class
  3. Town Class
  4. Dido Class
  5. Crown Colony Class
  6. Minotaur Class
  7. Elite Minotaur Class
Battleship:

  1. Queen Elizabeth Class
  2. Revenge Class
  3. Nelson Class
  4. King George V Class
  5. Lion Class
  6. Vanguard Class
  7. Elite Vanguard Class
Airplane Carrier:

  1. Argus Class
  2. Glorious Class
  3. Hermes Class
  4. Ark Royal Class
  5. Illustrious Class
  6. Majestic Class
  7. Elite Majestic Class
Rocket:

  1. RAE Larynx
  2. We.177
  3. Blue Steel
  4. PGM-17 Thor
Rocket Interceptor:

  1. Saunders-Roe SR.53
Railroad Gun:

  1. BL 18-Inch Railway Howitzer
Commandos:

  1. Commandos
Nuclear Reactor:

  1. Level 1
  2. Level 2
  3. Level 3
  4. Level 4
  5. Level 5
Nuclear Battleship:

  1. Nuclear-powered HMS Vanguard
Nuclear Submarine:

  1. HMS Dreadnought
Nuclear Airplane Carrier:

  1. Nuclear Majestic Class
Atomic Bomb:

  1. Level 1
  2. Level 2
  3. Level 3
Nuclear Rocket:

  1. PGM-17 Thor
Nuclear Bombers:

  1. Handley Page Halifax
  2. Avro Lancaster
  3. V-Class Bombers

The past is a foreign country.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

200 Replies

9 Apr 2016, 16:58

Yes, I agree with @Liberinsula

9 Apr 2016, 18:38

Liberinsula wrote:

But in all seriousness, it is certainly a good idea to have as many tech trees as possible. If there must be minor overlap, so be it. Also, I think it can be agreed that the most immediate one we'd wanna have is the British tree
Then a French research tree.
9 Apr 2016, 18:57

Not A Communist wrote:

Then a French research tree.
Or a Spanish research tree.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
9 Apr 2016, 20:01

I think after the British, the most urgent one is the Jap, which would be easy to do, since the skins are already there. After that, and I think people won'y agree, the most urgent is the Italian one.

The past is a foreign country.
9 Apr 2016, 20:03

Pablo22510 wrote:

I think after the British, the most urgent one is the Jap, which would be easy to do, since the skins are already there. After that, and I think people won'y agree, the most urgent is the Italian one.
Correct, and what happened with France?

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
9 Apr 2016, 20:06

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

I think after the British, the most urgent one is the Jap, which would be easy to do, since the skins are already there. After that, and I think people won'y agree, the most urgent is the Italian one.
Correct, and what happened with France?
Well, the Italians had more self-made weapons than the French.
The past is a foreign country.
9 Apr 2016, 20:07

Pablo22510 wrote:

Well, the Italians had more self-made weapons than the French.
It's possible, but France have good weapons in the WWII

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
9 Apr 2016, 20:09

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Well, the Italians had more self-made weapons than the French.
It's possible, but France have good weapons in the WWII
Errrr, maybe tanks, but the rest was horrible.
The past is a foreign country.
9 Apr 2016, 20:10

Pablo22510 wrote:

Errrr, maybe tanks, but the rest was horrible.
Correct.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
9 Apr 2016, 23:39

The French had good arty, some tanks and some planes. They had way more stuff than the Italians, including the Navy, I think.

9 Apr 2016, 23:41

Quasi-duck wrote:

The French had good arty, some tanks and some planes. They had way more stuff than the Italians, including the Navy, I think.
Correct! French need one skin.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
10 Apr 2016, 09:42

Quasi-duck wrote:

The French had good arty, some tanks and some planes. They had way more stuff than the Italians, including the Navy, I think.
Italians had a massive, good, self-made navy. I've read manny books about it. The only thing was that after the Swordfish raid on Tarento (their biggest naval base), they thought the Brits were unbeatable or something and stayed in Tarento.
The past is a foreign country.
10 Apr 2016, 13:38

Pablo22510 wrote:

Italians had a massive, good, self-made navy. I've read manny books about it. The only thing was that after the Swordfish raid on Tarento (their biggest naval base), they thought the Brits were unbeatable or something and stayed in Tarento.
The Italians had a good army, an organized army and a good aviation. The problem that took Italy is very bad strategy.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
10 Apr 2016, 17:12

Pablo22510 wrote:

Italians had a massive, good, self-made navy. I've read manny books about it. The only thing was that after the Swordfish raid on Tarento (their biggest naval base), they thought the Brits were unbeatable or something and stayed in Tarento.
Incorrect! You lose! Some Italian ships were unsteady and all had a short life on the gun barrel, about half of the Brits. The British could also last longer at sea. Italian ships needed to be serviced every few months and Italian ships only seemed fast because during tests they were pushed so hard they needed new engines.
10 Apr 2016, 17:35

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Italians had a massive, good, self-made navy. I've read manny books about it. The only thing was that after the Swordfish raid on Tarento (their biggest naval base), they thought the Brits were unbeatable or something and stayed in Tarento.
Incorrect! You lose! Some Italian ships were unsteady and all had a short life on the gun barrel, about half of the Brits. The British could also last longer at sea. Italian ships needed to be serviced every few months and Italian ships only seemed fast because during tests they were pushed so hard they needed new engines.
Dude, the Brits were VERY scared about the Italian Navy. Their battleships were especially good.
The past is a foreign country.
10 Apr 2016, 17:36

Pablo22510 wrote:

Dude, the Brits were VERY scared about the Italian Navy. Their battleships were especially good.
Britain had the best Naval Army in the world in 1939.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
10 Apr 2016, 17:37

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Dude, the Brits were VERY scared about the Italian Navy. Their battleships were especially good.
Britain had the best Naval Army in the world in 1939.
Lol, you can't have a 'Naval Army'. And yes, but Italians were in the Top 3.
The past is a foreign country.
10 Apr 2016, 17:38

Pablo22510 wrote:

Lol, you can't have a 'Naval Army'. And yes, but Italians were in the Top 3.
Correct.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
10 Apr 2016, 17:39

Pablo22510 wrote:

Their battleships were especially good.
Nah, they weren't. Only two ships actually sat well in the water and all of them had very short barrel life on their guns. On top of this, the British guns had a longer range, better targeting equipment and techniques as well as much more experience. On top of all this, the Brits had better morale too.
10 Apr 2016, 17:40

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Their battleships were especially good.
Nah, they weren't. Only two ships actually sat well in the water and all of them had very short barrel life on their guns. On top of this, the British guns had a longer range, better targeting equipment and techniques as well as much more experience. On top of all this, the Brits had better morale too.
Still, they were pretty good ships.
The past is a foreign country.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch