We know, what about High command features anyway?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
In the Spanish forum, this guy had a cool idea. Someone in the English forum already suggesting making Commandos 'land subs'. The Spanish guy kinda reajusted it, making the Commandos invisible in forests and mountains. It's a good idea, and a much needed buff for the Commandos.
Please log in to post a reply.
We know, what about High command features anyway?
Goddammit, do you even know what this thread is about Dave? The commandos going into stealth mode should be a HC feature.
not even thatEllio_98 wrote:
Yea i agree on that, the gun laws are ridiculous. More people have died due to gun crime between 1968 and 2011 than all the troops killed in all the wars the US fort in. This year up to october so far there's been: 294 mass shootings (where 3+ people are killed), 45 shootings at schools, 9,956 people killed, 20,000 left injured. 11,385 people died on average annually in firearm incidents in the US between 2001 and 2011.oceanhawk wrote:
well today I think USA is a little messed upSources:
pharma owners are crooks
No free health care
no laws for trade unions
I mean you cant get fired for joining a trade union in many countries
and I have heard that veterians arent treated well

Oh, I thought that was a different thread, Maybe Pablo could add a poll to decide?
The framers of the constitution, back then arms were muskets used for hunting rifles and defending their homescomrade dave wrote:
Lots of Americans consider it their right to bear arms because it dates back to the constitution created during the war for independence.
today you can but ar-15s
I think you should be allowed own hunting rifles and single shot weapons
not assult rifles
now to save the counter arguement to this
the last 8 mass shootings in america, we conducted with assult rifles....
you can defend you home with a bolt action rifle no problem, you can defend your country from an invasion( if u use that as a reason to bear arms) with rifles
but FFS take these military grade weapons off the streets
also a bit og ammo control wont hurt

True that, I think Obama would get further with restrictions placed on guns instead of outright banning them which people seem to think he wants to do.
Ok, the poll Dave:
Indeed
he cant changed one of the founding principles of the constitution
but he can sure fix it
maybe I should be president, I think I would do a good job lol

I understand americans think its their right to have Guns, but if its causing the death of thousands a year thats stupid. It like killing a whole small town every year, if the UK decided to kill everyone in a small town the world would be in shock but then no one cares that that number of people were dying yearly in the US due to idiotic gun laws.
Obama wanted to ban guns, but he got stopped by Congress.
It sure does suck, I think every congressman has to agree to pass a new amendment or law, kind of hard if your not the old and crusty 1970s bloke that fits in perfectly with the Southern ethos of the U.S
The guns being used at these shootings are assult riflesEllio_98 wrote:
I understand americans think its their right to have Guns, but if its causing the death of thousands a year thats stupid. It like killing a whole small town every year, if the UK decided to kill everyone in a small town the world would be in shock but then no one cares that that number of people were dying yearly in the US due to idiotic gun laws.
ffs, just get rid of them, leave the single shot hunting rifles as I mentioned
above

In America, we have a saying:Ellio_98 wrote:
I understand americans think its their right to have Guns, but if its causing the death of thousands a year thats stupid. It like killing a whole small town every year, if the UK decided to kill everyone in a small town the world would be in shock but then no one cares that that number of people were dying yearly in the US due to idiotic gun laws.
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people."
That's the entire argument against gun control.
Starting to get a little off topic, I believe this thread is about commandos and invisibility, not the state of gun control in the U.S.
I don't think it would be a good idea to make a unit have another type of feature if you are an HC player. I like the current dynamic which is that HC saves you time with its queuing abilities, but doesn't actually impact the units used.
IS that all it does?
HC shouldnt directly influence the battle, like allowing units hide that cant work... however
can help in others areas like it does, building ques etc

But then HC would be a pay to win, we don't want this becoming a pay to win guys
those you cant afford to pay lose, less people will play the game also

Doubt it. I have only come across big spenders once or twice. They got the gold for free. I come across people using commandos very rarely. A combo of the two is unlikely. Anyway, you can pay to win already thanks to being able to speed up builds to completion, buy as much res as you like off the market and force march forever with raising morale.
yea but that is not as common that people using HC
People using HC will now have to much of an advantage on the battlefield
cant have that
and HC is expensive as it is anyway

Please log in to post a reply.