Buff for Commandos (READ IT!)

oceanhawk spelled it wrong.

It was "who had more money"?

Yea sorry, when I try type fast and Im not on my usually PC, I can hit extra keys

ontop of that my spelling is terrible, sometimes I just dont bother going back and changing the word..

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

Foot soldiers becoming invisible in woods and mountains but weakened in cities? That is just ridiculous!

Getting back on track, I like this idea, but the penalty in cities is a little weird.

purplepizza117 wrote:

Don't say anything about being ridiculous, please, you wanted Nazi UFOs.

I can't remember, I'll have to find it.

Shoot, I can't find it!

Darn. I think he might have mentioned it in the Antarctica thread a while ago.

EDIT: I found UFO stuff, but nothing about BBB suggesting UFOs be added.

eehhh, no UFOs Please

I think I will make a thread and everbody post what new additions they have come up with, then i will do a poll, and let everybody decide what is the most popular addition to the game??

purplepizza117 wrote:

Don't say anything about being ridiculous, please, you wanted Nazi UFOs.

GreatbigHippo wrote:

EDIT: I found UFO stuff, but nothing about BBB suggesting UFOs be added.

He isn't. I remember perfectly about you wanting Nazi UFOs.

Pablo22510 wrote:

He isn't. I remember perfectly about you wanting Nazi UFOs.

Can we get back on topic?

Thank you, Pablo.

By checking out the thread Nazi's in the Antarctic, I reliased that the thread you talked about UFOs had been closed.

I believe we had a general consensus on HC having the invisibility earlier for em

Pablo22510 wrote:

I reliased that the thread you talked about UFOs had been closed.

Now can we please get back on topic? This should be a HC feature.

Bill and I talked about Nazi UFOs in a different thread

but that was removed as spam, we didnt want them in the game, we were jsut taking about random stuff

including nazi super weapons

See? *high fives Ocean*

*gets hit by a wave, when tries to high five back*

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

comrade dave wrote:

Lots of Americans consider it their right to bear arms

It is their right. Originally intended to defend from the British.

First, it isn't "considered" our Right; it is our Right. The Constitution clearly states "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Keywords "shall not be infringed".

As to the "defend from the British" comment, this is also incorrect. We were finished kicking the British's rear ends in 1783. The Constitution was not drafted until 1789.

The 2nd Amendment was for the people of the US to defend against the potential of a rogue government. It is our duty, should the Government become tyrannical, to fight for Freedom. The Founders wanted to have a government that feared its people, not a people that feared its Government. What is the first thing nations do when they want to suppress its citizens? They remove their ability to defend themselves.

I own many guns, and have never had to use any against a human being, ever. I haven't even had pull any weapon on a human being. I have never even seen a major crime committed and I live near and work in the 23rd largest city in the US.

The reports you hear in the news are lawless urban cities, for the most part, where Liberalism has reigned for many years. For instance, Chicago hasn't seen a Conservative policy maker in decades and crime rules the day. Chicago has the toughest gun laws in the nation, yet has the most gun crimes. Same for Washington DC and New York.

In the South (where I live), most everyone owns guns--I will be in a duck blind hunting ducks Friday. Here, we even have "open carry" laws (like the old Western days) where you can wear your pistol out in public. Yet we have the lowest gun crimes per capita. Almost always when you see the news of a mass shooting, it's in an area where guns were not allowed and the planners of those events obviously took that into account. What rarely makes the news is where someone tried to start a mass shooting and was taken out by someone returning fire from their personal weapon.

MemphisDon wrote:

23rd largest city in the US.

MemphisDon wrote:

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

comrade dave wrote:

Lots of Americans consider it their right to bear arms

It is their right. Originally intended to defend from the British.

First, it isn't "considered" our Right; it is our Right. The Constitution clearly states "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Keywords "shall not be infringed".

As to the "defend from the British" comment, this is also incorrect. We were finished kicking the British's rear ends in 1783. The Constitution was not drafted until 1789.

The 2nd Amendment was for the people of the US to defend against the potential of a rogue government. It is our duty, should the Government become tyrannical, to fight for Freedom. The Founders wanted to have a government that feared its people, not a people that feared its Government.

What is the first thing nations do when they want to suppress its citizens? They remove their ability to defend themselves.

I own many guns, and have never had to use any against a human being, ever. I haven't even had pull any weapon on a human being. I have never even seen a major crime committed and I live near and work in the 23rd largest city in the US.

The reports you hear in the news are lawless urban cities, for the most part, where Liberalism has reigned for many years. For instance, Chicago hasn't seen a Conservative policy maker in decades and crime rules the day. Chicago has the toughest gun laws in the nation, yet has the most gun crimes. Same for Washington DC and New York.

In the South (where I live), most everyone owns guns--I will be in a duck blind hunting ducks Friday. Here, we even have "open carry" laws (like the old Western days) where you can wear your pistol out in public. Yet we have the lowest gun crimes per capita. Almost always when you see the news of a mass shooting, it's in an area where guns were not allowed and the planners of those events obviously took that into account. What rarely makes the news is where someone tried to start a mass shooting and was taken out by someone returning fire from their personal weapon.

I think the prob is that the guns being used...