Why is canada so much more smaller than america. Isn’t this supposed to be historically accurate
Please log in to post a reply.
Canada has more land area than America, but most of it is uninhabited.
there are also a bunch of cities in canada that hasn’t been added to the game, and it should still be bigger
Fine. They should give it a few more cities.
yay !!!
Like which ones?cl0xy wrote:
there are also a bunch of cities in canada that hasn’t been added to the game, and it should still be bigger
Ohhh CANADA OH CANADA
probably like halifax, yellowknife, oshawa, thunder bay, brampton, prince george, victoria, hamilton, london, charlottetown, whitehorse and I can go onwhowh wrote:
Like which ones?cl0xy wrote:
there are also a bunch of cities in canada that hasn’t been added to the game, and it should still be bigger
Remember this is 1942 we're talking about. In 1941 the population of whitehorse was 754. We're not giving points for that especially when shipping hubs like glasgow or cities like San Diego remain worth nothing.
But you do have a good point that many countries (including canada) need more cities.
alright
Well I mean Canada was never really populated many people. Most of Canada is a barren tundra filled with geese and deers.
ah yes the geesevietcong2005 wrote:
geese
Aren't cities based on military significance and not really population? Anchorage is a city and in 1942 had a population of 6000. Halifax 30 years before had ten times that population and its Canada's most significant Atlantic port, militarily. I think it should at least become a city.
Don't look at me for Bytro's choices in what is a city and what isn't
why is smolensk not a soviet city and germany needs to get dresden
Please log in to post a reply.
