You know you can like, build a fort, right?
Cities essentially act like this anyway with "soft targets" already. You know what the soft targets are, right? Think flesh.
21 Apr 2016, 22:29
Cities as forts
Thoughts on cities acting as fortifications for certain units...
I was thinking about this.. thoughts?
just thought it might be interesting worth while idea..
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
18 Replies
21 Apr 2016, 22:31
point is..
if I have infantry in a field.. or in a city..
they will be safer in a city...
small increase, less than forts..
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
21 Apr 2016, 22:33
Yes, I said this is already present for soft targets, which are infantry.oceanhawk wrote:
small increase, less than forts..
22 Apr 2016, 14:09
Your suggestion is the fortification.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
22 Apr 2016, 14:21
yes it should
currently it is fine vs tanks ,but arties and bombers do as much dmg units in the city as on open field 
22 Apr 2016, 15:05
Or the mountains and woods. Hills too.Orkhepaj wrote:
arties and bombers do as much dmg units in the city as on open field
22 Apr 2016, 16:45
woods and hills same terrain here..Quasi-duck wrote:
Or the mountains and woods. Hills too.Orkhepaj wrote:
arties and bombers do as much dmg units in the city as on open field
but yea.. sure be safer from Bombing in cites and mountains..
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
22 Apr 2016, 18:26
And?oceanhawk wrote:
woods and hills same terrain here..
22 Apr 2016, 19:22
you stated as if they were different..Quasi-duck wrote:
And?oceanhawk wrote:
woods and hills same terrain here..
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
22 Apr 2016, 19:28
No, you misunderstood.oceanhawk wrote:
you stated as if they were different..
22 Apr 2016, 19:30
right....
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
22 Apr 2016, 19:31
[/img]
But in all seriousness city's already affect some of the units combat ablity since due to terrain modifications (Urban). Also you can build fortifications
Forum Gang Divine Entity
Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.
22 Apr 2016, 19:32
A fort only takes 24 hours to build so this is pointless.
22 Apr 2016, 19:35
just to infantry, they take less damage..
it would make sense I guess..
just was thinking about it..
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
22 Apr 2016, 20:43
Well, if you're talking about TBs, I feel the opposite thing should be done: infantry AA values are indignantly high
The past is a foreign country.
23 Apr 2016, 04:44
IMHO, all ground units have too good of AA.
But it always seems like the enemy's AA is better than my AA even when we have the same ratings. What's up with that?
I've lost nearly half of all atomic bombers on attack due to small-numbered groups of AA (i.e., 3 AA accompanying 5 other units and they still shoot down my nukes). I'm in the 100+ Nuke Club, so the shoot-downs are quite significant for me.
On the other hand, it seems like tac bombers are way overrated as well. But then again, it's usually the other guy's tac bombers whooping my ground forces while my tac bombers get shot down by his ground forces.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3
23 Apr 2016, 10:11
Exactly.Diabolical wrote:
On the other hand, it seems like tac bombers are way overrated as well. But then again, it's usually the other guy's tac bombers whooping my ground forces while my tac bombers get shot down by his ground forces.
The past is a foreign country.
4 Jun 2016, 12:18
Yo could have the cities to resullp the troops and increase morle also you could add a supremacy 1914 feeling to the cities?
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
