Hello everyone, and welcome to the Call of War unofficial Comprehensive Suggestion List.
The goal of this thread is to list everything that has been suggested on the forums, and categorize them based on what players want. For now, there will be a simple 3 category system, but in the future I may rank some items depending on how important they are, or the frequency of discussion.
Items in the "Positives" section have a general support from most players, and some are very likely to be added in the future. Items in the "Negatives" section have been discussed and have been found to be a feature that should not be added to Call of War. Items in the "Undecided" category have mixed reviews and probably need more discussion to determine whether the majority of players want them or not. So, without further ado...
List of Suggestions for Call of War:
Positive Reviews:
Aircraft no longer defending against ground troops when not moving on an airfield
Disbanding Units
Marines
Paratrooper (sorry Bill)
Trading technology
Larger amount of men per infantry unit
Pacific Map
Faroe islands
Tank Destroyers
Coastal Guns
Naval Bomber Buff
Railroad gun buff
Cancel all orders button
Radio operators
Breaking down buildings
Commando rebalance w/ stealth
Minelayers + sweeper ships
Cruiser variants
Corvettes/Patrol Boats
Escort ships
World Map
Kiel Canal
Group Conversations
Intelligence Station building
Ocean Zones (to incentivize island hopping)
Other Maps (America, Middle East, Asia, etc.)
Group Chat for nations
Healing buildings
Healing troops
Farms/food rebalancing
SAM (mix of bomber and fighter)
Dynamic view range in different terrain
Sort TRADE LIST provinces in alphabetical order
Negative Reviews:
Resource Sliders (like S1914)
Buffing Infantry
Less resource intake from building things (food, manpower, etc.)
Tanks/mech inf only using oil when moving
More specific types of bombers (subject to change)
Multiple ports
Old graphics
Police
Recruiting office
Non-core production penalty removal
Minimap
Super Weapons
play as small AI countries
Retreating
Renaming Provinces
Undecided:
Province detail page
Kicking active players for RP
Prize Wheel (like S1914)
Capturing planes
Music
Wonder Weapons
Supply line logistics
Different Monetization features
Tank destroying aircraft
Faster railroads
Bunkers
Limit on Nukes/Reactors
Naming Regiments
Province View
Weather
Encirclement debuffing troops/province
Medals for First/Second/Third
Choosing where to place airfields within provinces
Rivers
Gold-free games
Gold limits
Radar
Deconstruction
I'm sure there's plenty of things that I've missed here, so feel free to include any suggestions I may have missed.
689 Replies
2 Jun 2016, 19:37
Diabolical wrote:
Captain_Mo wrote:
Suggestion:
Add a button where you can easily copy a city's name. This will allow the player to paste (ctrl - V) it in the chat, and coordinate attacks.
Actually, now you can copy on-screen text, so this isn't really a needed extra feature. Just select a city name on screen (Ctrl-C), and paste elsewhere (Ctrl-V).
Doesn't seem to work for me.
Another suggestion:
Enable "delay" for bombers. When a bomber is refueling and another is ready to go, selecting both to attack the same target should make the ready bomber wait for the refueling one, instead of sending them out as they are ready.
Enable "add target" for air units. Right now I think this function makes them move instead of attack. I think it would be useful to add "target queues" to air units.
2 Jun 2016, 19:45
In addition, it would be nice if there was an "isolate" option for a stack of TACs so they don't combine with other stacks when they return from attack to refuel. This would make using TACs much less painful.
2 Jun 2016, 20:03
OK two ideas
1.coalition wars where the coalition can declare war on another coalition
2. a mobile app of call of war
2 Jun 2016, 20:25
Captain_Mo wrote:
Diabolical wrote:
Enable "delay" for bombers. When a bomber is refueling and another is ready to go, selecting both to attack the same target should make the ready bomber wait for the refueling one, instead of sending them out as they are ready.
Actually you already can do that, looks funny too seeing a flying plane at a complete stop in the air!
2 Jun 2016, 22:55
DxC wrote:
In addition, it would be nice if there was an "isolate" option for a stack of TACs so they don't combine with other stacks when they return from attack to refuel. This would make using TACs much less painful.
Actually, if your aircraft are just refueling but still on a mission, they won't recombine with other parked units unless those other units happen to finish refueling at the exact same time and they are running a duplicate mission against the same target.
Redd Baron wrote:
Captain_Mo wrote:
Diabolical wrote:
Enable "delay" for bombers. When a bomber is refueling and another is ready to go, selecting both to attack the same target should make the ready bomber wait for the refueling one, instead of sending them out as they are ready.
Actually you already can do that, looks funny too seeing a flying plane at a complete stop in the air!
Actually, it looks funny staring at the world from low orbit and seeing aircraft and tanks and soldiers. The aircraft appear to be large enough to block out the sun over entire cities. The tanks look like the size of a mountain. And the infantry are about 15 miles tall.
How's that for realism?
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all. The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended. R.I.P. Snickers <3
3 Jun 2016, 08:29
Diabolical wrote:
Actually, it looks funny staring at the world from low orbit and seeing aircraft and tanks and soldiers. The aircraft appear to be large enough to block out the sun over entire cities. The tanks look like the size of a mountain. And the infantry are about 15 miles tall.
How's that for realism?
Wait, what? Are you complaining that the devs made figures easy to see? I mean, the "game board"
is meant to be kind of like a war table or whatever.
3 Jun 2016, 08:57
Quasi-duck wrote:
Wait, what? Are you complaining that the devs made figures easy to see? I mean, the "game board"
is meant to be kind of like a war table or whatever.
Yep, it's just a game. If you want real open the front door and step outside.
3 Jun 2016, 14:27 (edited)
DxC wrote:
Yep, it's just a game. If you want real open the front door and step outside.
"May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't" -George S. Patton "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination" - Albert Einstein
3 Jun 2016, 22:55
Redd Baron wrote:
Captain_Mo wrote:
Diabolical wrote:
Enable "delay" for bombers. When a bomber is refueling and another is ready to go, selecting both to attack the same target should make the ready bomber wait for the refueling one, instead of sending them out as they are ready.
Actually you already can do that, looks funny too seeing a flying plane at a complete stop in the air!
I don't see a "delay" button anywhere. Is there a trick to do this?
Diabolical wrote:
DxC wrote:
In addition, it would be nice if there was an "isolate" option for a stack of TACs so they don't combine with other stacks when they return from attack to refuel. This would make using TACs much less painful.
Actually, if your aircraft are just refueling but still on a mission, they won't recombine with other parked units unless those other units happen to finish refueling at the exact same time and they are running a duplicate mission against the same target.
That's the point. Sometimes I want to split up a huge stack to attack the same target for better SBDE, but I guess it's not a big deal because you can manually send them in waves with some time between them, but sometimes I find that if they land within a few seconds, they seem to group together on their next run.
3 Jun 2016, 23:08
Yea, I'm not sure about the exact time between sorties that is needed for them not to combine, but I'm always paranoid to let them return and attack again unless I'm watching, which is really annoying.
3 Jun 2016, 23:11
Captain_Mo wrote:
I don't see a "delay" button anywhere. Is there a trick to do this?
You can delay or force march when flying to other base, but not when attacking or patrolling. But for you question it would be better to just have a force combine option between a resting and refueling stack. It would also be handy to be able to combine patrolling planes.
4 Jun 2016, 00:05
That all mods are removed at once (Including squiggles)
5 Jun 2016, 00:55
FilipALFA wrote:
DxC wrote:
Yep, it's just a game. If you want real open the front door and step outside.
I was being an humorist with my earlier comment about monstrous-sized infantry and the like.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all. The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended. R.I.P. Snickers <3
5 Jun 2016, 05:23
Captain_Mo wrote:
Redd Baron wrote:
Captain_Mo wrote:
Diabolical wrote:
Enable "delay" for bombers. When a bomber is refueling and another is ready to go, selecting both to attack the same target should make the ready bomber wait for the refueling one, instead of sending them out as they are ready.
Actually you already can do that, looks funny too seeing a flying plane at a complete stop in the air!
I don't see a "delay" button anywhere. Is there a trick to do this?
Yes. ctrl select a unit with a delay button to add to the mixed force.
5 Jun 2016, 20:34
Has it been discussed to post "Gold Spent" in the newspaper perhaps? Many clan fights etc talk about not spending gold and using the honor system. Why can't the game just track it as one of the ranking systems they post in the newspaper?
Sorry if im late to the game on that one.
Thanks
5 Jun 2016, 20:37
I
Bruno315 wrote:
Has it been discussed to post "Gold Spent" in the newspaper perhaps? Many clan fights etc talk about not spending gold and using the honor system. Why can't the game just track it as one of the ranking systems they post in the newspaper?
Sorry if im late to the game on that one.
Thanks
Maybe just for that particular game,
otherwise thats a great idea, I hope its added
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
6 Jun 2016, 04:04
I think the last thing Bytro wants to do is to penalize people for using gold.
6 Jun 2016, 08:01
DxC wrote:
I think the last thing Bytro wants to do is to penalize people for using gold.
They wont, but this isnt really penalizing people. Its more along the lines of just recording it, for challenges
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
6 Jun 2016, 12:23
they should at least limit the amount of gold that can be used per game. this would at least make it a level playing field for those don't sink paychecks into this game
6 Jun 2016, 13:31
SplitPersonality wrote:
they should at least limit the amount of gold that can be used per game. this would at least make it a level playing field for those don't sink paychecks into this game
Never gonna happen soz
anti gold ideas, dont go far
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists -Friedrich von Haye
🔒This thread is locked. No new replies can be posted.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.
