Supremacy Logo
Locked

Comprehensive Suggestion List

Hello everyone, and welcome to the Call of War unofficial Comprehensive Suggestion List.

The goal of this thread is to list everything that has been suggested on the forums, and categorize them based on what players want. For now, there will be a simple 3 category system, but in the future I may rank some items depending on how important they are, or the frequency of discussion.

Items in the "Positives" section have a general support from most players, and some are very likely to be added in the future. Items in the "Negatives" section have been discussed and have been found to be a feature that should not be added to Call of War. Items in the "Undecided" category have mixed reviews and probably need more discussion to determine whether the majority of players want them or not. So, without further ado...

List of Suggestions for Call of War:

Positive Reviews:

  • Aircraft no longer defending against ground troops when not moving on an airfield
  • Disbanding Units
  • Marines
  • Paratrooper (sorry Bill)
  • Trading technology
  • Larger amount of men per infantry unit
  • Pacific Map
  • Faroe islands
  • Tank Destroyers
  • Coastal Guns
  • Naval Bomber Buff
  • Railroad gun buff
  • Cancel all orders button
  • Radio operators
  • Breaking down buildings
  • Commando rebalance w/ stealth
  • Minelayers + sweeper ships
  • Cruiser variants
  • Corvettes/Patrol Boats
  • Escort ships
  • World Map
  • Kiel Canal
  • Group Conversations
  • Intelligence Station building
  • Ocean Zones (to incentivize island hopping)
  • Other Maps (America, Middle East, Asia, etc.)
  • Group Chat for nations
  • Healing buildings
  • Healing troops
  • Farms/food rebalancing
  • SAM (mix of bomber and fighter)
  • Dynamic view range in different terrain
  • Sort TRADE LIST provinces in alphabetical order
Negative Reviews:

  • Resource Sliders (like S1914)
  • Buffing Infantry
  • Less resource intake from building things (food, manpower, etc.)
  • Tanks/mech inf only using oil when moving
  • More specific types of bombers (subject to change)
  • Multiple ports
  • Old graphics
  • Police
  • Recruiting office
  • Non-core production penalty removal
  • Minimap
  • Super Weapons
  • play as small AI countries
  • Retreating
  • Renaming Provinces
Undecided:

  • Province detail page
  • Kicking active players for RP
  • Prize Wheel (like S1914)
  • Capturing planes
  • Music
  • Wonder Weapons
  • Supply line logistics
  • Different Monetization features
  • Tank destroying aircraft
  • Faster railroads
  • Bunkers
  • Limit on Nukes/Reactors
  • Naming Regiments
  • Province View
  • Weather
  • Encirclement debuffing troops/province
  • Medals for First/Second/Third
  • Choosing where to place airfields within provinces
  • Rivers
  • Gold-free games
  • Gold limits
  • Radar
  • Deconstruction

I'm sure there's plenty of things that I've missed here, so feel free to include any suggestions I may have missed.

689 Replies

7 Jun 2016, 00:34

of coarse the game is funded by players buying gold, in not limiting usage make it cost less gold to perform actions

7 Jun 2016, 08:07

Gold isn't an issue, i've said this for the past year or so- sound strategy and thinking beat someone who pumps out gold units. Limiting it is stupid, I believe learning to defeat gold players helps increase skill

"If the tanks succeed, then victory follows."- H.Guderian
"Hit first ! Hit hard ! Keep on hitting ! ! (The 3 H's)" Admiral Jackie Fisher
"The 3 Requisites for Success – Ruthless, Relentless, Remorseless(The 3 R's)" Admiral Fisher
Crates: a Term used to define any unwanted and unneeded feature in CoW
Game Username: LordStark01
7 Jun 2016, 08:57

TankBuster wrote:

Gold isn't an issue, i've said this for the past year or so- sound strategy and thinking beat someone who pumps out gold units. Limiting it is stupid, I believe learning to defeat gold players helps increase skill
plus you are still hurting the other players wallet as well.. !

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
7 Jun 2016, 11:56

What an utterly useless list. Please give links to where these items were actually suggested so one can see better explanations of each. Right now it's a list without any clarification. And far from comprehensive, what is in the 26 pages of replies?

7 Jun 2016, 13:07

Right on man. Information needs to be organized, not thrown into a big steaming pile of ....

7 Jun 2016, 22:42

Suggestion. WORK on MOBILE MORE.

13 Jun 2016, 12:33

suggestion:

make a option for "NO Gold" when making a map, so one cant use gold in that map. think it should be mostly made to alliance challenges. cause many times when challenging another alliance they usually come to terms with "no gold", but some people ignore this when coming to in game map.

than it would be nice if one could be able to make the game register if there is any gold getting used in that map or even making it impossible to use in that map.

PS hope it makes sense

gunsofwar
EN Moderator
13 Jun 2016, 13:54

gunsofwar wrote:

suggestion:

make a option for "NO Gold" when making a map, so one cant use gold in that map. think it should be mostly made to alliance challenges. cause many times when challenging another alliance they usually come to terms with "no gold", but some people ignore this when coming to in game map.

than it would be nice if one could be able to make the game register if there is any gold getting used in that map or even making it impossible to use in that map.

PS hope it makes sense

This has already been suggested and discussed, but "Not Gold" option would not give benefit to the company, therefore, as much as possible,is that it is not implemented.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
13 Jun 2016, 14:16

Caesar wrote:

gunsofwar wrote:

suggestion:

make a option for "NO Gold" when making a map, so one cant use gold in that map. think it should be mostly made to alliance challenges. cause many times when challenging another alliance they usually come to terms with "no gold", but some people ignore this when coming to in game map.

than it would be nice if one could be able to make the game register if there is any gold getting used in that map or even making it impossible to use in that map.

PS hope it makes sense

This has already been suggested and discussed, but "Not Gold" option would not give benefit to the company, therefore, as much as possible,is that it is not implemented.
not even only on alliance challenges??
gunsofwar
EN Moderator
13 Jun 2016, 14:52

gunsofwar wrote:

not even only on alliance challenges??
No.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
17 Jun 2016, 10:32

gunsofwar wrote:

suggestion:

make a option for "NO Gold" when making a map, so one cant use gold in that map. think it should be mostly made to alliance challenges. cause many times when challenging another alliance they usually come to terms with "no gold", but some people ignore this when coming to in game map.

than it would be nice if one could be able to make the game register if there is any gold getting used in that map or even making it impossible to use in that map.

PS hope it makes sense

I would support this, if it is only for alliance matches. Make it a selectable option too.
17 Jun 2016, 18:27

Quasi-duck wrote:

gunsofwar wrote:

suggestion:

make a option for "NO Gold" when making a map, so one cant use gold in that map. think it should be mostly made to alliance challenges. cause many times when challenging another alliance they usually come to terms with "no gold", but some people ignore this when coming to in game map.

than it would be nice if one could be able to make the game register if there is any gold getting used in that map or even making it impossible to use in that map.

PS hope it makes sense

I would support this, if it is only for alliance matches. Make it a selectable option too.
that is exactly what im suggesting. but sadly i dont think its gonna get through, even though it could be a nice think to have
gunsofwar
EN Moderator
17 Jun 2016, 18:28

gunsofwar wrote:

that is exactly what im suggesting. but sadly i dont think its gonna get through, even though it could be a nice think to have
What a pity. I think a lot of people who play alliance matches would support the idea.
17 Jun 2016, 18:30

Quasi-duck wrote:

gunsofwar wrote:

that is exactly what im suggesting. but sadly i dont think its gonna get through, even though it could be a nice think to have
What a pity. I think a lot of people who play alliance matches would support the idea.
agreed. i know that my fellow alliance members would support it, since we play against others where we have the rule NO GOLD. but sadly it is not all who follow that rule..
gunsofwar
EN Moderator
17 Jun 2016, 19:25

The only way I would support the 'no gold' rule is if, say, users had to pay 1,000 Gold to join.

Another stipulation could be only those with High Command or pay 5,000 Gold can create the map, with each player paying 1,000 Gold to ensure a no Gold round.

Pax Romana Communications Officer
17 Jun 2016, 20:04

StrangeTalent wrote:

The only way I would support the 'no gold' rule is if, say, users had to pay 1,000 Gold to join.

Another stipulation could be only those with High Command or pay 5,000 Gold can create the map, with each player paying 1,000 Gold to ensure a no Gold round.

Yeah, I was thinking that too.
17 Jun 2016, 20:42

Yes, high command or gold rounds only. It could be temporarily put into effect and I bet Bytro would see how much we generally despise the use of gold magic. It would generate more money.

17 Jun 2016, 20:48

StrangeTalent wrote:

The only way I would support the 'no gold' rule is if, say, users had to pay 1,000 Gold to join.

Another stipulation could be only those with High Command or pay 5,000 Gold can create the map, with each player paying 1,000 Gold to ensure a no Gold round.

atleast that is a compromise. but just think that would make it difficult for many alliances to make that or that may just be me who thinks that.

may you all have a good hunting no matter what :)

gunsofwar
EN Moderator
17 Jun 2016, 20:49

mfncff wrote:

Yes, high command or gold rounds only. It could be temporarily put into effect and I bet Bytro would see how much we generally despise the use of gold magic. It would generate more money.
so you suggest making rounds where one have to use a minimum of gold or??
gunsofwar
EN Moderator
17 Jun 2016, 21:33

No. We pay to Gold to ensure no Gold is used during the map.

Pax Romana Communications Officer
Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch