Locked

Comprehensive Suggestion List

Hello everyone, and welcome to the Call of War unofficial Comprehensive Suggestion List.

The goal of this thread is to list everything that has been suggested on the forums, and categorize them based on what players want. For now, there will be a simple 3 category system, but in the future I may rank some items depending on how important they are, or the frequency of discussion.

Items in the "Positives" section have a general support from most players, and some are very likely to be added in the future. Items in the "Negatives" section have been discussed and have been found to be a feature that should not be added to Call of War. Items in the "Undecided" category have mixed reviews and probably need more discussion to determine whether the majority of players want them or not. So, without further ado...

List of Suggestions for Call of War:

Positive Reviews:

  • Aircraft no longer defending against ground troops when not moving on an airfield
  • Disbanding Units
  • Marines
  • Paratrooper (sorry Bill)
  • Trading technology
  • Larger amount of men per infantry unit
  • Pacific Map
  • Faroe islands
  • Tank Destroyers
  • Coastal Guns
  • Naval Bomber Buff
  • Railroad gun buff
  • Cancel all orders button
  • Radio operators
  • Breaking down buildings
  • Commando rebalance w/ stealth
  • Minelayers + sweeper ships
  • Cruiser variants
  • Corvettes/Patrol Boats
  • Escort ships
  • World Map
  • Kiel Canal
  • Group Conversations
  • Intelligence Station building
  • Ocean Zones (to incentivize island hopping)
  • Other Maps (America, Middle East, Asia, etc.)
  • Group Chat for nations
  • Healing buildings
  • Healing troops
  • Farms/food rebalancing
  • SAM (mix of bomber and fighter)
  • Dynamic view range in different terrain
  • Sort TRADE LIST provinces in alphabetical order
Negative Reviews:

  • Resource Sliders (like S1914)
  • Buffing Infantry
  • Less resource intake from building things (food, manpower, etc.)
  • Tanks/mech inf only using oil when moving
  • More specific types of bombers (subject to change)
  • Multiple ports
  • Old graphics
  • Police
  • Recruiting office
  • Non-core production penalty removal
  • Minimap
  • Super Weapons
  • play as small AI countries
  • Retreating
  • Renaming Provinces
Undecided:

  • Province detail page
  • Kicking active players for RP
  • Prize Wheel (like S1914)
  • Capturing planes
  • Music
  • Wonder Weapons
  • Supply line logistics
  • Different Monetization features
  • Tank destroying aircraft
  • Faster railroads
  • Bunkers
  • Limit on Nukes/Reactors
  • Naming Regiments
  • Province View
  • Weather
  • Encirclement debuffing troops/province
  • Medals for First/Second/Third
  • Choosing where to place airfields within provinces
  • Rivers
  • Gold-free games
  • Gold limits
  • Radar
  • Deconstruction

I'm sure there's plenty of things that I've missed here, so feel free to include any suggestions I may have missed.

689 Replies

The f35 is terrible and the UK is buying up to 40 for it's two new aircraft carriers instead of the f18 or a navalised typhoon or tornado.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Your 100% right, the F-35 is a piece of junk, a spitfire would be more effective

thats not exaggerated at all....

an F-18 I think is ideal carrier fighter, or if they had a naval typhoon that would be ideal

Glad to find somebody on the saem page as me :P


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

comrade dave wrote:

The f35 is terrible and the UK is buying up to 40 for it's two new aircraft carriers instead of the f18 or a navalised typhoon or tornado.
Haha, UK is going to waste so much money! Poor Dave, look what is going to happen to your money!
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

The Spanish Air Force is made up of F-16s and Eurofighters, and both of them are better than the F-35.

The past is a foreign country.

I take my country's defense as a serious matter. I agree though a Spitfire would perform better than a f35. your from Britain are you not?

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

comrade dave wrote:

I take my country's defense as a serious matter. I agree though a Spitfire would perform better than a f35. your from Britain are you not?
Me? No. A Sea Fury would top a Spit though, especially if you gave it Sidewinders and such.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

I was talking to ocean hawk

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Oh, oops.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

comrade dave wrote:

I take my country's defense as a serious matter. I agree though a Spitfire would perform better than a f35. your from Britain are you not?
nah

Ireland

we got a few pc-9s(5)

we dont even have an airforce its an air corps

lol


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Ireland, your dreadful armed forces. Lol.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Im not even going to argue with that, we have a very poor armed forces, well devoted troops with a high level of pride, but a joke of every thing, naval service ( not even navy), armoured corps are a joke, along with every thing else

a few months ago, a russian place came near our air space, now wer couldnt even intercepted it, the British found it a threat the them, and it might have gone near the north, so the RAF had to scramble their typhoons

jezz....


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

well, you might be surprised what you can find in army surplus stores and ebay.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

yea, I found a guy, on youtube who buys army rations and tests them

pretty cool to watch, about 30-40 min long, I just thought It was intresting

I have found body armour and scopes and even helmets on alibaba, they cheap chinease factory store..

finland like us have a neutral stance, but they have a stronger armed forces than us.

altough we have strong ties with the US, improving Ties with the UK, and to be honest I dont think anybody would bother to invade here,

unless they were after the UK, maybe

We are also in the EU, and members of the Nordic battlegroup and if im correct we are the 2nd biggest contributors ( in terms of units) to that battle group after Sweden


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

good stuff.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

our special forces

the ARW

The army ranger wing, or their Irish name, which I cant even think off as my irish is pretty bad

they pulled off a mission in sudan? a few years ago, rescuing about 17hostages, and taking the warlord of the local area hostage, without any causlities

I guess its not much compared to the SAS, but they could put up a fair fight

:thumbup:


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Well, the Iranian embassy seige is why the sas well known, but ARW sounds awesome.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

comrade dave wrote:

Well, the Iranian embassy seige is why the sas well known, but ARW sounds awesome.
The SAS also pulled of a highjaked plane, and lots during Normandy, even.

I would put them above all US army Special forces,( Delta, Green berets,)


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

our special forces

the ARW

The army ranger wing, or their Irish name, which I cant even think off as my irish is pretty bad

they pulled off a mission in sudan? a few years ago, rescuing about 17hostages, and taking the warlord of the local area hostage, without any causlities

I guess its not much compared to the SAS, but they could put up a fair fight

Wasn't this operation in conjunction with the Brits and the Brits lost one man?
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

our special forces

the ARW

The army ranger wing, or their Irish name, which I cant even think off as my irish is pretty bad

they pulled off a mission in sudan? a few years ago, rescuing about 17hostages, and taking the warlord of the local area hostage, without any causlities

I guess its not much compared to the SAS, but they could put up a fair fight

Wasn't this operation in conjunction with the Brits and the Brits lost one man?
As far as i am aware, I dont think so

other wise I would have phrased it differently

I doubt it, Ireland worked with Sweden in Sudan,

but I doubt, I will look into it later,


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Oh, okay. I must've made a mistake so.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch