Yep! It does.FilipALFA wrote:
included the WW2 veterans who told the story and they also appear in the series.
14 Oct 2015, 23:45
Locked
Comprehensive Suggestion List
Hello everyone, and welcome to the Call of War unofficial Comprehensive Suggestion List.
The goal of this thread is to list everything that has been suggested on the forums, and categorize them based on what players want. For now, there will be a simple 3 category system, but in the future I may rank some items depending on how important they are, or the frequency of discussion.
Items in the "Positives" section have a general support from most players, and some are very likely to be added in the future. Items in the "Negatives" section have been discussed and have been found to be a feature that should not be added to Call of War. Items in the "Undecided" category have mixed reviews and probably need more discussion to determine whether the majority of players want them or not. So, without further ado...
List of Suggestions for Call of War:
Positive Reviews:
- Aircraft no longer defending against ground troops when not moving on an airfield
- Disbanding Units
- Marines
- Paratrooper (sorry Bill)
- Trading technology
- Larger amount of men per infantry unit
- Pacific Map
- Faroe islands
- Tank Destroyers
- Coastal Guns
- Naval Bomber Buff
- Railroad gun buff
- Cancel all orders button
- Radio operators
- Breaking down buildings
- Commando rebalance w/ stealth
- Minelayers + sweeper ships
- Cruiser variants
- Corvettes/Patrol Boats
- Escort ships
- World Map
- Kiel Canal
- Group Conversations
- Intelligence Station building
- Ocean Zones (to incentivize island hopping)
- Other Maps (America, Middle East, Asia, etc.)
- Group Chat for nations
- Healing buildings
- Healing troops
- Farms/food rebalancing
- SAM (mix of bomber and fighter)
- Dynamic view range in different terrain
- Sort TRADE LIST provinces in alphabetical order
- Resource Sliders (like S1914)
- Buffing Infantry
- Less resource intake from building things (food, manpower, etc.)
- Tanks/mech inf only using oil when moving
- More specific types of bombers (subject to change)
- Multiple ports
- Old graphics
- Police
- Recruiting office
- Non-core production penalty removal
- Minimap
- Super Weapons
- play as small AI countries
- Retreating
- Renaming Provinces
- Province detail page
- Kicking active players for RP
- Prize Wheel (like S1914)
- Capturing planes
- Music
- Wonder Weapons
- Supply line logistics
- Different Monetization features
- Tank destroying aircraft
- Faster railroads
- Bunkers
- Limit on Nukes/Reactors
- Naming Regiments
- Province View
- Weather
- Encirclement debuffing troops/province
- Medals for First/Second/Third
- Choosing where to place airfields within provinces
- Rivers
- Gold-free games
- Gold limits
- Radar
- Deconstruction
I'm sure there's plenty of things that I've missed here, so feel free to include any suggestions I may have missed.
689 Replies
17 Oct 2015, 19:55
May we please have a way to sort the province list by morale?
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3
17 Oct 2015, 19:55
I have suggested that many times and the overwhelming majority of Call of War players want it.
17 Oct 2015, 19:58
EVERYBODY wants it.
British=best. Duh!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
17 Oct 2015, 19:59
I couldn't care less.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
17 Oct 2015, 20:00
I'm not sure what utility it would have...
The past is a foreign country.
17 Oct 2015, 20:14
Bytro recently adjusted the distance-to-capital morale penalty...making it more noticeable. Now, if you have a far-flung empire spanning across northern Europe and America, but your principle enemy has the other half of Europe and Africa, your game is long from over. So you need every bit of production you can muster to overwhelm them in the long game. This means maxing out production from Louisville, USA to Perm, USSR. And if your capital is in Washington, then Perm is going to need a level 5 fortress combined with a Level 3 Infrastructure and Level 5 Factory just to eek out a bare minimum of Rare Materials to help fund your next nuclear missile.Pablo22510 wrote:
I'm not sure what utility it would have...
Since the morale hit can seriously reduce production, I need to be able to prioritize which provinces need fortresses built to help raise up that morale. Also, this can show you where you haven't been recovering fast enough from older provincial captures. And this can also show where enemy spies might be flooding one or more of your provinces with tons of economic spies to sabotage production and morale in preparation for an invasion.
As mentioned previously by comrade dave, this feature is wanted by "EVERYBODY". But these listed reasons should satisfy even the biggest skeptics like Butter Ball Turkey...I mean Bill.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3
17 Oct 2015, 20:15
This was already here, they just shortened the distance via air travel. Did you not know this?Diabolical wrote:
They recently adjusted the distance-to-capital morale penalty
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
17 Oct 2015, 20:17
You're a noob who doesn't seem to understand the game. I've had multiple far flung empires with no problems and I did not have to build a load of crap or move my capital.Diabolical wrote:
As mentioned previously by comrade dave, this feature is wanted by "EVERYBODY". But these listed reasons should satisfy even the biggest skeptics like Butter Ball Turkey...I mean Bill.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
17 Oct 2015, 20:24
It is pretty old news, just scroll through the patch announcements.
British=best. Duh!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
17 Oct 2015, 20:28
Thanks for that useless piece of trash... just kidding. Didn't know they'd adjusted it. You convinced me.Diabolical wrote:
Bytro recently adjusted the distance-to-capital morale penalty...making it more noticeable. Now, if you have a far-flung empire spanning across northern Europe and America, but your principle enemy has the other half of Europe and Africa, your game is long from over. So you need every bit of production you can muster to overwhelm them in the long game. This means maxing out production from Louisville, USA to Perm, USSR. And if your capital is in Washington, then Perm is going to need a level 5 fortress combined with a Level 3 Infrastructure and Level 5 Factory just to eek out a bare minimum of Rare Materials to help fund your next nuclear missile.Since the morale hit can seriously reduce production, I need to be able to prioritize which provinces need fortresses built to help raise up that morale. Also, this can show you where you haven't been recovering fast enough from older provincial captures. And this can also show where enemy spies might be flooding one or more of your provinces with tons of economic spies to sabotage production and morale in preparation for an invasion.
As mentioned previously by comrade dave, this feature is wanted by "EVERYBODY". But these listed reasons should satisfy even the biggest skeptics like Butter Ball Turkey...I mean Bill.
The past is a foreign country.
17 Oct 2015, 20:29
They made it better and shortened the distances.Pablo22510 wrote:
Didn't know they'd adjusted it
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
17 Oct 2015, 20:51
Can we have aircraft carriers?
17 Oct 2015, 21:12
When they're ready we can.
British=best. Duh!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
17 Oct 2015, 21:20
That will take 1 year more, so close or it will be gift rapped for Christmas.
"May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't"
-George S. Patton
"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"
- Albert Einstein
-George S. Patton
"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"
- Albert Einstein
17 Oct 2015, 21:37
Bill, the community skill level is very low at this point in development. You could have terrible strategy and not play half the time and still win a game easily. Mistakes like this don't effect gameplay because others don't take advantage of it.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
You're a noob who doesn't seem to understand the game. I've had multiple far flung empires with no problems and I did not have to build a load of crap or move my capital.Diabolical wrote:
As mentioned previously by comrade dave, this feature is wanted by "EVERYBODY". But these listed reasons should satisfy even the biggest skeptics like Butter Ball Turkey...I mean Bill.
17 Oct 2015, 21:57
I disagree.salbalkus wrote:
the community skill level is very low at this point in development
I disagree.salbalkus wrote:
Mistakes like this don't effect gameplay because others don't take advantage of it.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
18 Oct 2015, 02:05
Diabolical wrote:
le to prioritize which provinces need fortresses built to help raise up that morale. Also, this can show you where you haven't been recovering fast enough from older provincial captures. And this can also show where enemy spies might be flooding one or more of your provinces with tons of economic spies to sabotage production and morale in preparation for an invasion.
If you consider playing dozens of matches across several months 'noob' status, then I'm a noob.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
You're a noob who doesn't seem to understand the game. I've had multiple far flung empires with no problems and I did not have to build a load of crap or move my capital.Diabolical wrote:
As mentioned previously by comrade dave, this feature is wanted by "EVERYBODY". But these listed reasons should satisfy even the biggest skeptics like Butter Ball Turkey...I mean Bill.
Butter Ball Bill wrote:
This was already here, they just shortened the distance via air travel. Did you not know this?Diabolical wrote:
They recently adjusted the distance-to-capital morale penalty
I do know strategy and the RECENT changes have actually backfired because, though the distance is shortened by the as-the-bird-flies calculation (which I did read), they have apparently increased the penalty per distance. Even my very first far-flung empires that I made soon after I first started playing had much better morale than the ones I've made since the most recent update. I play enough and pay attention enough to notice these things.
And I've never moved my capital even when it might make sense for others to do so. My strategy is better. And building lots of stuff is just the kind of person I am. I'm a builder type of strategist. My kind have been targeted for swift destruction by the "Let's build a million Zurglings" type of players for many years now. I learned how to defeat them with my style long ago. This game is no different. So bring it on.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3
18 Oct 2015, 08:52
Look, if this feature gives you problems you must really suck at the game. This is the first time that I can remember of people complaining about the distance to the capital. So obviously it is only a problem to you.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
18 Oct 2015, 09:40
Well, @Diabolical, Bill has a point. If it wasn't for you I'd have never known, because it didn't affect me in any way.
The past is a foreign country.
This thread is locked. No new replies can be posted.
