Conscription, Trade Manpower?

Pretty sure it was a thing before and removed because...... It sucks?

The hell/10 unnoble.

This person is a hundred percent serious and really wants to add slavery to the game… @Kadeko???

Carking the 6th wrote:

This person is a hundred percent serious and really wants to add slavery to the game… @Kadeko???

I mean...ok, trading manpower, but slavery??

Hell no!

I remember you saying you’d like slavery to be added…

Carking the 6th wrote:

I remember you saying you’d like slavery to be added…

I was trying to find a way to trade manpower without being called slavery...

I haven't found any solution yet...

It's the only resource that you can't sell/buy/trade....

KADEKO I KNOW WHAT YOU DID TO THOSE SOUTH EAST ASIANS

Bro it was a prank, although I think I should be able to trade manpower.

Carking the 6th wrote:

KADEKO I KNOW WHAT YOU DID TO THOSE SOUTH EAST ASIANS

I mean… was it unjustifie-

Carking the 6th wrote:

I mean… was it unjustifie-

No one needs to know what we did to those people...

Commander Schleicher wrote:

Bro it was a prank, although I think I should be able to trade manpower.

It's realistic. This did happen during the war.

I also think the whole relation between manpower, manpower limits, recruitment size, and population size (which is itself cursed) needs a major rework. 10% at least should be the max recruitment, and population sizes in this game are usually far too large. They could benefit from reading this.

I agree, the population never makes sense. Iceland out here with a 5 million population while Germany only has 50. I do love the idea of a lend lease you're talking about which used to be in the game. But unfortunately the way the game works doesn't support the concept. Tanks or vehicles aren't declared as separate equipment in game, but they contain the whole crew, bombs, and operating costs when overall costs are put into effect.

Now I learned that in order to get responses on your suggestions, make the title as controversial as possible. My last suggestion from a few minutes before this one still has 0 responses.

I mean sure but you’ll also get deleted and banned soooo….

Commander Schleicher wrote:

Now I learned that in order to get responses on your suggestions, make the title as controversial as possible. My last suggestion from a few minutes before this one still has 0 responses.

But hey!

They're not here...not yet...

Commander Schleicher wrote:

I agree, the population never makes sense. Iceland out here with a 5 million population while Germany only has 50. I do love the idea of a lend lease you're talking about which used to be in the game. But unfortunately the way the game works doesn't support the concept. Tanks or vehicles aren't declared as separate equipment in game, but they contain the whole crew, bombs, and operating costs when overall costs are put into effect.

You are quite right, a unit = a whole regiment (or often more) as I am at pains to point out to some new players who wonder "why does a light tank cost more than a submarine?"

However, I am talking about literally trading units. This did happen sometimes, for example:

• The Condor Legion in Spain was under the command of Nationalist Spain.
• The Soviet Union essentially lent China a Red Army fighter wing so protect its interests in 1939.
• Nationalist China itself had two route armies, X and Y force, placed under (Anglo-American) CBI command for the defence of India. They were trained and equipped by the US Army and returned to NRA service after the war.
• In Europe, both the Axis and Allies had some divisions placed under the command of an ally's army -- essentially giving or lending a unit to them.

Commander Schleicher wrote:

Now I learned that in order to get responses on your suggestions, make the title as controversial as possible. My last suggestion from a few minutes before this one still has 0 responses.