Convert a portion of historic world war rounds into the All countries:All in version rounds
β’
CAN WE CONVERT A PORTION OF THE HISTORIC WORLD WAR ROUNDS INTO THE ALL COUNTRIES: ALL IN EVENT VERSION, I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE BETTER DO DO THIS, I MEAN, EVERYONE LOVES THAT EVENT!
VOTE: SHOULD WE CONVERT SOME HISTORIC WORLD WAR ROUNDS INTO EVENT VERSION?
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
53 Replies
1 May 2020, 22:46
You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.
You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.
One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats
There was once a match that I played where the winning coalition was Bhutan (me), Siam, Haiti, New Zealand, and Honduras
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
4 May 2020, 00:26
Chimere wrote:
You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.
You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.
One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats
well Iβm telling you, itβs true
4 May 2020, 00:37
BLITZ6666 wrote:
Chimere wrote:
You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.
You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.
One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats
well Iβm telling you, itβs true
but how...
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
4 May 2020, 08:05
BLITZ6666 wrote:
Chimere wrote:
You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.
You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.
One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats
I only played one game as Yugoslavia, and I managed to ally with Danzig among other countries before being obliterated by I think Spain and USSR. Wasn't a game I expected to win, but it was fun seeing the absurdity of Yemen and Oman's OP food production.
BLITZ6666 wrote:
Chimere wrote:
You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.
You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.
One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats
well Iβm telling you, itβs true
Probable, but unlikely. We can never prove, but if it's true, good for you. If it's false, I don't really care.
"As long as there are sovereign nations possessing great power, war is inevitable." Albert Einstein "Giving up is not an option in war, for it proves one's incapability and incompetence as a leader." - Me (Little Racoon)
4 May 2020, 13:57
Little Racoon wrote:
I only played one game as Yugoslavia, and I managed to ally with Danzig among other countries before being obliterated by I think Spain and USSR. Wasn't a game I expected to win, but it was fun seeing the absurdity of Yemen and Oman's OP food production.
BLITZ6666 wrote:
Chimere wrote:
You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.
You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.
One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats
well Iβm telling you, itβs true
Probable, but unlikely. We can never prove, but if it's true, good for you. If it's false, I don't really care.
I played Yugoslavia once and got wiped out on the third day because all the players just rushed me.
4 May 2020, 15:18
Oh, Iβve seen a player win as Yugo. . The only bad nations in All countries All in are the colonial empires. There are so many small nations that all your colonies end up being seized after a few days, and then youβll have economic problems and itβs not fun.
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
4 May 2020, 15:42
Oh, yes me 2. Just bad luck, that time.
4 May 2020, 16:58
Ryan04px2025 wrote:
Oh, yes me 2. Just bad luck, that time.
Yeah, probably just too many active players around you teamed up.
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
4 May 2020, 17:18
Too active and all around me
4 May 2020, 18:37
I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...
... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.
I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...
... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.
Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
5 May 2020, 01:23
Killer8282 wrote:
Chimere wrote:
I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...
... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.
Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
I beat italy and France as Switzerland but Germany (obviously) had to kill me
5 May 2020, 09:58
BLITZ6666 wrote:
Killer8282 wrote:
Chimere wrote:
I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...
... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.
Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
I beat italy and France as Switzerland but Germany (obviously) had to kill me
I was first as Netherlands but Germany got mad that I was ahead of him and just attacked me. Itβs reallly annoying when that happens.
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
5 May 2020, 15:16
Killer8282 wrote:
BLITZ6666 wrote:
Killer8282 wrote:
Chimere wrote:
I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...
... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.
Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
I beat italy and France as Switzerland but Germany (obviously) had to kill me
I was first as Netherlands but Germany got mad that I was ahead of him and just attacked me. Itβs reallly annoying when that happens.
same
12 May 2020, 10:01
YES!! THE Next event is All countries All in!
12 May 2020, 10:13
YYaaaaayyyyyy!!!!!
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
12 May 2020, 10:15
Now I canβt wait for this event to start! 3 days...
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE