Skip to main content

Convert a portion of historic world war rounds into the All countries:All in version rounds

CAN WE CONVERT A PORTION OF THE HISTORIC WORLD WAR ROUNDS INTO THE ALL COUNTRIES: ALL IN EVENT VERSION, I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE BETTER DO DO THIS, I MEAN, EVERYONE LOVES THAT EVENT!

VOTE: SHOULD WE CONVERT SOME HISTORIC WORLD WAR ROUNDS INTO EVENT VERSION?

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

53 Replies

You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.

You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.

One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats

There was once a match that I played where the winning coalition was Bhutan (me), Siam, Haiti, New Zealand, and Honduras :)

If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

Chimere wrote:

You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.

You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.

One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats

well I’m telling you, it’s true

BLITZ6666 wrote:

Chimere wrote:

You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.

You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.

One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats

well I’m telling you, it’s true
but how...
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

BLITZ6666 wrote:

Chimere wrote:

You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.

You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.

One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats

well I’m telling you, it’s true
Sure. Keep telling others that ^^.

I only played one game as Yugoslavia, and I managed to ally with Danzig among other countries before being obliterated by I think Spain and USSR. Wasn't a game I expected to win, but it was fun seeing the absurdity of Yemen and Oman's OP food production.

BLITZ6666 wrote:

Chimere wrote:

You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.

You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.

One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats

well I’m telling you, it’s true
Probable, but unlikely. We can never prove, but if it's true, good for you. If it's false, I don't really care.

"As long as there are sovereign nations possessing great power, war is inevitable." Albert Einstein
"Giving up is not an option in war, for it proves one's incapability and incompetence as a leader." - Me (Little Racoon)

Little Racoon wrote:

I only played one game as Yugoslavia, and I managed to ally with Danzig among other countries before being obliterated by I think Spain and USSR. Wasn't a game I expected to win, but it was fun seeing the absurdity of Yemen and Oman's OP food production.

BLITZ6666 wrote:

Chimere wrote:

You had 450 points as Luxemburg ? Maybe.

You had 450 as Luxemburg and won as Belgium and Netherlands and Finland ans Lithuania and Denmark ? I doubt it.

One can win with these [I myself won with Latvia] but I do not believe you won 40% of your Β« all countries Β» battles with those weak countries given your stats

well I’m telling you, it’s true
Probable, but unlikely. We can never prove, but if it's true, good for you. If it's false, I don't really care.
I played Yugoslavia once and got wiped out on the third day because all the players just rushed me. :(

Oh, I’ve seen a player win as Yugo. :P . The only bad nations in All countries All in are the colonial empires. There are so many small nations that all your colonies end up being seized after a few days, and then you’ll have economic problems and it’s not fun.

If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

Oh, yes me 2. Just bad luck, that time.

Ryan04px2025 wrote:

Oh, yes me 2. Just bad luck, that time.
Yeah, probably just too many active players around you teamed up.
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

Too active and all around me

Chimere wrote:

I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...

... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.

Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

Killer8282 wrote:

Chimere wrote:

I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...

... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.

Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
I beat italy and France as Switzerland but Germany (obviously) had to kill me

BLITZ6666 wrote:

Killer8282 wrote:

Chimere wrote:

I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...

... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.

Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
I beat italy and France as Switzerland but Germany (obviously) had to kill me
I was first as Netherlands but Germany got mad that I was ahead of him and just attacked me. It’s reallly annoying when that happens.
If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

Killer8282 wrote:

BLITZ6666 wrote:

Killer8282 wrote:

Chimere wrote:

I think Liberia is literally the worst country you can take. Sure, you can easily seize vaste lands as your neighbours are occupied in Europe...

... but those lands have no resources, and eventually whoever won in Europe come get points in Africa.

Yes, I agree. Liberia is probably the worst.
I beat italy and France as Switzerland but Germany (obviously) had to kill me
I was first as Netherlands but Germany got mad that I was ahead of him and just attacked me. It’s reallly annoying when that happens.
same

YES!! THE Next event is All countries All in!

YYaaaaayyyyyy!!!!!

If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

Now I can’t wait for this event to start! 3 days...

If I had Canadian Soldiers, American Technology, and British Officers, I would rule the world. -Winston Churchill
FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Play Our Games