Huh? 
Defensive buildings
This is for defensive buildings not production buildings or units i think defensive buildings should act like regular units but are stuck in one location this will make two things possible 1:You can defend a large front without sacrificing offensive capabilities and 2:Will make strategic bombers useful since no one has ever built lvl 5 fortifacations on a large front lvl 1 maybe but 5 to expensive and there could be 2 types costal and land both defending against certain units.
9 Replies
Yeah I donβt really understand what you mean...WascallywabbitCDN wrote:
Huh?

FORUM GANG Second Lieutenant
CALL OF WAR TECHNICIAN THIRD GRADE
i mean that they act like fortifacations but instead of having to base units there the fortifacation would be a unit that doesn't move
Fortifications don't move ..... do you mean a static defensive unit? 
From what you described... these are fortifications...
"Giving up is not an option in war, for it proves one's incapability and incompetence as a leader." - Me (Little Racoon)
he means a fortification which will fight on its own but doesn't need units stationed there.
Hm... that can be a great idea but will need some money.blue44elephant wrote:
he means a fortification which will fight on its own but doesn't need units stationed there.
I like it, I love it, I want more of it. That is definitely a great idea. They should also make naval harbors, air bases, and capitals fight back too. What's the fun of a naval base if it can't fight itself some.
General Erwin Rommel
A good plan violently executed now is a better that a perfect plan executed next week.
General George Patton, Jr.
Look fortification are meant to be defense structures but air bases and naval harbors should not be like the fortifications since they are not defensive capitals they should be like fortifications since every country fights to the death to there capital unless your Russia
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.