Doctrine continent domination

What about when barracks could be built in non-city provinces?

Donk2.0 wrote:

What about when barracks could be built in non-city provinces?

Or when rurals counted as points.

Or when Hungary was on the clash of nations map

Destroyers had range?

Nuclear Ships!

Endgame 1944…

Tournament Island!

Apologies for the later reply

Daniel_Phelps wrote:

Ah, yes. The mainland Asian countries that famously fought the interwar-wartime-post war years with Japanese doctrines and equipment.

Contrast to the British, who had thousands of Crusaders, Matildas, Valentines, and other tanks during the war, but are all represented by American units. We can't have every major player have a doctrine.

Thailand was buying Japanese arms from 1935 onwards and its Ha-Go's served well into the 1950s. The Dutch and Indonesians both used Japanese tanks in the Indonesian War of Independence.

The PRC operated up to 100 ShinHoto Chi-Ha's even giving it its own designation as the Gongchen or "Heroic tank".

Followers of my Chinese Civil War playthrough will remember this image of PLA Chi-Has advancing through Peking following the declaration of the People's Republic of China

As far as planes go, the Nakajima Ki-43 continued to be used by Thailand and Indonesia (and even to some extent by the Chinese). In Indochina, the French used the Zero and other fighters minimally, but continued to use seaplanes and bombers for until 1950 coastal patrol and against the Việt Minh (source)

Japanese artillery and small arms, particularly mortars and machine-guns, were used in civil conflicts well into the cold war, including by the PLA, Mayalan and Indonesia insurgents, and North Vietnam.

Photographic evidence of Japanese artillery in PLA service; wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com claims these saw use in the Korean War.

Before the war, the Chinese bought the light cruiser Ning Hai off the Harima shipyard, and had her sister Ping Hai built to the same specifications in the Jiangnan Shipyard, Shanghai. Both were essentially based on the Japanese cruiser Yūbari.

I rest my case

Carking the 6th wrote:

Their guerrila tactics and strategy wasn’t too far off, even considering German support. For a doctrine called Pan-Asian it would work, regardless of Pan-Asian usually referring to the Japanese ideology.

Makes sense do people really think they were axis or commie or something?

What does CF mean tho?

Carking the 6th wrote:

Makes sense do people really think they were axis or commie or something?

[Ain't no way I'm copying all this]

What does CF mean tho?

Not really though, stands for confer when comparing sources &c. en.wiktionary.org/cf.#English

Although given the Soviet T-26 tanks and I-16 fighter the KMT used, and the Sino-German cooperation both of these have at least some justification.

Having some tanks and training som soldiers wouldn’t make you communist or ISIS would be working for the Union and every western country would just be another version of the US military…

Carking the 6th wrote:

Having some tanks and training som soldiers wouldn’t make you communist or [...] every western country would just be another version of the US military

Then again what would Nationalist China be except Pan-Asian? It's the only one that makes sense.

Well the next closest thing other than allied would be axis obviously, considering that’s what it used to be.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Well the next closest thing other than allied would be axis obviously, considering that’s what it used to be.

_Pyth0n_ wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Well the next closest thing other than allied would be axis obviously, considering that’s what it used to be.

Time for new doctrine perhaps-

Spoiler

/j

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

_Pyth0n_ wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Well the next closest thing other than allied would be axis obviously, considering that’s what it used to be.

Time for new doctrine perhaps-

Spoiler

/j

Maybe some sort of pan-African doctrine would be good.

Donk2.0 wrote:

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

_Pyth0n_ wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Well the next closest thing other than allied would be axis obviously, considering that’s what it used to be.

Time for new doctrine perhaps-

Spoiler

/j

Maybe some sort of pan-African doctrine would be good.

Africa didn't really have anything... thats the problem.

I mean they had no real heavy industry either lol. At least not enough to build a real army and doctrine. It was only in the 50’s that North African states like Egypt gained that and even now most African country’s don’t have much of a military industry, preferring to import from outside countries.