Fighter-Bomber

Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.

So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.

For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.

And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.

Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind

:)

Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

19 Replies

RheinPanzer wrote:

Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.

So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.

For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.

And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.

Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind

:)

Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber

Gameplay wise it wouldn't make sense. I'm sure others will take the effort to debunk whatever claims you put forth about its usefulness.

I'm sometimes slow but if I understand correctly,he suggests that the planes should be combined into a single plane or two planes?a fighter-bomber/attack-fighter?...

Use nuclear weapons instead. They do both jobs well!


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

_Pyth0n_ wrote:

RheinPanzer wrote:

Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.

So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.

For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.

And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.

Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind

:)

Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber

Gameplay wise it wouldn't make sense. I'm sure others will take the effort to debunk whatever claims you put forth about its usefulness.
I mean, every thing has its own pros and cons

And I ALREADY said that β€œIdk if this is good”

But… nukes.


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

I know.

RheinPanzer wrote:

I know.
Then you don’t need it. NUKE SPAM!

CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes

RheinPanzer wrote:

Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes
Carking's just pointing out the redundancy of your proposed unit, but I suppose a lot of units would be redundant with nukes involved. Instead, I feel that nukes have been brought up since no one is taking this proposal seriously, for various reasons.

Just as real life :(

RheinPanzer wrote:

_Pyth0n_ wrote:

RheinPanzer wrote:

Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.

So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.

For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.

And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.

Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind

:)

Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber

Gameplay wise it wouldn't make sense. I'm sure others will take the effort to debunk whatever claims you put forth about its usefulness.
I mean, every thing has its own pros and consAnd I ALREADY said that β€œIdk if this is good”
It's cool you said you don't know if it's good you merely just wondered if it's a good idea... well I and maybe more don't think it's good.Maybe in theory but the game is based on actual WW2 scenarios and units.I doubt the game developers would scrap the existing planes and just design the one plane doing all the jobs of all the different planes.

It is actually a good idea but like it was mentioned, game wise (COW wise) it won't suffice. :thumbup:

Btw, how to reply

Where?


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Carking the 6th wrote:

Where?
Think he's talking about quoting

RheinPanzer wrote:

Btw, how to reply
When you hover over a response on the thread, you can see a few buttons: the first one should be a quote one

I kind of like this but I also kind of don't.

I would, perhaps, suggest it as a specialized naval fighter. Remove the ability for current aircraft to go on carriers, and make that exclusive to naval fighters who have well-rounded performance against an array of target types.

RheinPanzer wrote:

Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes
Mentioning nukes in a thread about fighter-bombers is just another example of

the trolls frequent inane and off topic commentary, just to satisfy the "pay attention to me" syndrome.

Such a glorious and respectable use of ad-hominems for no other reason than to be an asshat on the internet! I’m so proud of you!


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

cycle9 wrote:

RheinPanzer wrote:

Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes
Mentioning nukes in a thread about fighter-bombers is just another example ofthe trolls frequent inane and off topic commentary, just to satisfy the "pay attention to me" syndrome.
Seriously, what's up with you? It's a forum for a game, he's not bothering anyone except you, and he likes nukes. Honestly...
Have a blessed day <3

Carking the 6th wrote:

Such a glorious and respectable use of ad-hominems for no other reason than to be an asshat on the internet! I’m so proud of you!
Awwww, they grow up so fast, don't they ^^

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch