Gameplay wise it wouldn't make sense. I'm sure others will take the effort to debunk whatever claims you put forth about its usefulness.RheinPanzer wrote:
Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.
For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.
And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.
Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind
![]()
Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber
Fighter-Bomber
Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.
So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.
For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.
And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.
Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind
Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
19 Replies
I'm sometimes slow but if I understand correctly,he suggests that the planes should be combined into a single plane or two planes?a fighter-bomber/attack-fighter?...
Use nuclear weapons instead. They do both jobs well!
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
I mean, every thing has its own pros and cons_Pyth0n_ wrote:
Gameplay wise it wouldn't make sense. I'm sure others will take the effort to debunk whatever claims you put forth about its usefulness.RheinPanzer wrote:
Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.
For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.
And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.
Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind
![]()
Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber
And I ALREADY said that βIdk if this is goodβ
But⦠nukes.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
I know.
Then you donβt need it. NUKE SPAM!RheinPanzer wrote:
I know.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes
Carking's just pointing out the redundancy of your proposed unit, but I suppose a lot of units would be redundant with nukes involved. Instead, I feel that nukes have been brought up since no one is taking this proposal seriously, for various reasons.RheinPanzer wrote:
Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes
Just as real life 
It's cool you said you don't know if it's good you merely just wondered if it's a good idea... well I and maybe more don't think it's good.Maybe in theory but the game is based on actual WW2 scenarios and units.I doubt the game developers would scrap the existing planes and just design the one plane doing all the jobs of all the different planes.RheinPanzer wrote:
I mean, every thing has its own pros and consAnd I ALREADY said that βIdk if this is goodβ_Pyth0n_ wrote:
Gameplay wise it wouldn't make sense. I'm sure others will take the effort to debunk whatever claims you put forth about its usefulness.RheinPanzer wrote:
Got a suggestion, idk if this is good but im just gonna say it.So this Fighter-Bomber is a combination between Interceptor and Attack Bomber. So an Attack Aircraft still can Intercept Planes but can also Attack Ground Targets.
For example, a plane like Bf-110. I know its already in the game but I think its not fit for it only to be used as an Interceptor only. Because Bf-110 is used for being an Interceptor AND an Attack Aircraft so I think its eligible to become an Attack Fighter.
And a plane like the P-400, P-61, P-38 I thionk those are good when becoming an Attack Fighter.
Idk this idea just popped up out of my mind
![]()
Ok I changed the name to Fighter-Bomber
It is actually a good idea but like it was mentioned, game wise (COW wise) it won't suffice. ![]()
Btw, how to reply
Where?
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Think he's talking about quotingCarking the 6th wrote:
Where?
When you hover over a response on the thread, you can see a few buttons: the first one should be a quote oneRheinPanzer wrote:
Btw, how to reply
I kind of like this but I also kind of don't.
I would, perhaps, suggest it as a specialized naval fighter. Remove the ability for current aircraft to go on carriers, and make that exclusive to naval fighters who have well-rounded performance against an array of target types.
Mentioning nukes in a thread about fighter-bombers is just another example ofRheinPanzer wrote:
Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes
the trolls frequent inane and off topic commentary, just to satisfy the "pay attention to me" syndrome.
Such a glorious and respectable use of ad-hominems for no other reason than to be an asshat on the internet! Iβm so proud of you!
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Seriously, what's up with you? It's a forum for a game, he's not bothering anyone except you, and he likes nukes. Honestly...cycle9 wrote:
Mentioning nukes in a thread about fighter-bombers is just another example ofthe trolls frequent inane and off topic commentary, just to satisfy the "pay attention to me" syndrome.RheinPanzer wrote:
Ok, why something about Attack Fighters are becoming something about nukes
Awwww, they grow up so fast, don't theyCarking the 6th wrote:
Such a glorious and respectable use of ad-hominems for no other reason than to be an asshat on the internet! Iβm so proud of you!

Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.