deja vu playing in my head
Hasn't this suggestion been asked multiple times before?
Basically, a new diplomacy option to fund AI nations with money, maybe call it tribute (not historically accurate) it would be good for improving your relationship with AI, and it can't be used on countries that have rebelled/where there has been an uprising, that way people can't cause the uprising mechanic to be even more painful than it already is.
Maybe you could send money to a revolting country if you are directly at war with the country they revolted from.
an Alternative could be to have this as a new spy, or espionage option, it would pay the country it's positioned in with resources/money for every day that it is stationed there, if this way was implemented, then there would be a limit on how many of these spies could be in one individual country.
deja vu playing in my head
Hasn't this suggestion been asked multiple times before?
Interesting ideaβ¦ not sure how feasible it is but I like the sound of it. Who knew youβd get this from an RP thread.
This along with allowing A.I to accept some trades would make the A.I more realistic and the game a bit more enjoyable when most of the players enviably go inactive after a couple days.
I like this idea.
Yes, I agreed with you 100%Kyle Callam wrote:
This along with allowing A.I to accept some trades would make the A.I more realistic and the game a bit more enjoyable when most of the players enviably go inactive after a couple days.
I also found paydaysay.com to be a valuable resource for urgent loans in Oregon providing essential information on lenders, loan amounts, and application processes. If anyone over here wants to buy equipment for the Call Of War game then you can visit can the given link where you will find all the information you need to get a loan easily. You can also take that loan for your own personal use.Still a good idea.
The option should be limited though, in order not to unbalance the game.
dO nOt ReViVe DeAd ThReAdS

Jeez...june/july? Really?
The suggestions section does not have that many posts. More response time should be acceptable.
There is a difference between actually contributing to a post in a good manner or just replying to a month-old post saying: "Yep, cool idea, but it might unbalance the game."Ignatio Oddball wrote:
Jeez...june/july? Really?The suggestions section does not have that many posts. More response time should be acceptable.
Not saying that universally reviving dead threads is bad, but there should be a justification.
There is nothing actually wrong with it, but going into detail about what you mean would be a pretty good thing to do.
I thought it would be a pretty obvious statement that if this mechanism was not to be limited, it would be possible to turn AI-controlled nations around anywhere in the world. Especially end game on the larger maps, there will be nations with virtually endless resources. If the foreign aid was to have any effect for the early to mid-game, the resource amount required would in return make the end game donation wildly over powered.
There are even further possible effects.
So if Bytro was to introduce this feature, it would take a lot of tinkering to avoid unbalancing effects.
There you have it. 
And I still consider it better to voice your opinion on a subject in an existing thread rather than everyone just making their own thread about identical suggestions...
Please log in to post a reply.