Geography Lesson

Ok I know this is highly critical but my imagination only goes so far.

1) While I absolutely LOVE that you gave control of Nebraska and Iowa to my State, our Capital would only ever be Topeka, not Omaha!

2) The south-central Kansas Province is too far south to be Derby. Derby is a suburb of Wichita, and would not exist without Wichita. That town should really be either Wellington, Winfield, or Arkansas City, and probably the later. In the Northeast you have Kansas City positioned far too low. It is almost due East of Topeka. Likewise Marysville, MO is closer to Omaha, NE and Des Moines, IA than Topeka. If you look at a map you can almost draw a straight line from Kansas City to Denver. Denver is just slightly North of Kansas City while Salina is just slightly South, with Topeka in the middle on an uptick between the two. I like seeing Hutchinson on the map except its in the position where Newton resides. Hutch is more NW of Wichita. Please understand I am not arguing the point of the provinces or the names of the provinces so much as the positions of the cities. Although the provinces themselves could be made a bit more to scale. You've got Nebraska very squished.

3) I doubt Coloradans would ever allow their Capital to be Casper, Wyoming

4) You going to ignite a real war putting all of the Deep South States in one with New Orleans at the Capital.

I am sure the people from other States and/or Nations also have serious problems with how the map is drawn. I know you guys are trying to squeeze a lot in and keep it a balance, but you need to keep it realistic too.