What about male-chauvinism as a resource?
Everytime some soldier would crack a joke about a mom or a blonde his mates would get an instant buff in overall strength and speed?
Could we please think about having girlpower added as a resource? We could use it when low on manpower. Or even instead of after all men are seldom there when needed.
Just a thought.
Please log in to post a reply.
What about male-chauvinism as a resource?
Everytime some soldier would crack a joke about a mom or a blonde his mates would get an instant buff in overall strength and speed?
Yeah I will go for that too. A bit like a swear box.
I swear if they change it from manpower to personpower or some gender neutral bs imma hunt you down and kill you xD
Personpower! never thought of that, good one. I was thinking human resources as used in industry. Happy to go with personpower.
Personpower isn't even a word, is it?...Lizzy wrote:
Personpower! never thought of that, good one. I was thinking human resources as used in industry. Happy to go with personpower.
Perhaps the time has come for this to happen.BjorniXL wrote:
Personpower isn't even a word, is it?...
Para if ShadowHawk5 kills me I want you to revenge my death by taking the cause forward please.
Nah. Manpower is a word, personpower isn't. I'd be fine with the game saying "human resources" if that makes people happy but taking a word that does not exist instead would be stupid.Paramunac wrote:
Perhaps the time has come for this to happen.BjorniXL wrote:
Personpower isn't even a word, is it?...
This is WWII I think manpower which is a real word is quite appropriate as is. Dangit Lizz now I have to kill you and Para to stop personpower from becoming a thing XD
Perhaps a vote is needed
manpower makes the most sense, no need to change it. No women in the military in world war 2
Yeah no women in military. I think u just forget Russian womens was allin and Finnish womens as Lotta.
btw nice quote of Mannerheim
yeah, some partisan units recruited women, even as front line soldiers, but partisan units are represented in this game by rebellions in provinces with low morale, not by armies.
Absolutely. I second that... Hahaha, I hope this thread is a joke.ShadowHawk5 wrote:
I swear if they change it from manpower to personpower or some gender neutral bs imma hunt you down and kill you xD
Two players wanting my blood now, feeling a bit insecure. 
"girlpower!"
Feminists would be triggered if they see a female infantry division going against a heavy tank division
That's why we would put this:King Draza Mihajlovic wrote:
"girlpower!"Feminists would be triggered if they see a female infantry division going against a heavy tank division
_________________________
Girlpower (Trigger Warning)
The amount you can currently use, certainly not in stock, that makes it sound like the women are slaves: 43,192
Women who can currently volunteer to fight for you (don't rush us or it's sexism, check your privilege
13,762 per day
Most women who you can have, if you have more, you're a member of the patriarchy: 223,497
How much women your sexist tank divisions use per day as opposed to the oppressive men:
See, you know, that's how I would do it. That way we don't offend any of our good ol' friends... Except realists.
Lol you are madder than me.
Yep!Lizzy wrote:
Lol you are madder than me.

Please log in to post a reply.