Could we please think about having girlpower added as a resource? We could use it when low on manpower. Or even instead of after all men are seldom there when needed.
Just a thought.
Please log in to post a reply.
Okay, here's how it is. The term 'manpower' is just a generic term used to describe how many workers/recruits you can use to build a battalion/regiment/brigade/division/corps/army etc. Down with making history politically correct!Lizzy wrote:
Personpower! never thought of that, good one. I was thinking human resources as used in industry. Happy to go with personpower.
Down with making most things politically correct! It's ridiculous how upset people can get over some things. There are some situations where things should be changed but then people go overboard.aphGermany wrote:
Okay, here's how it is. The term 'manpower' is just a generic term used to describe how many workers/recruits you can use to build a battalion/regiment/brigade/division/corps/army etc. Down with making history politically correct!Lizzy wrote:
Personpower! never thought of that, good one. I was thinking human resources as used in industry. Happy to go with personpower.
I have a white van you can borrow.purplepizza117 wrote:
Absolutely. I second that... Hahaha, I hope this thread is a joke.ShadowHawk5 wrote:
I swear if they change it from manpower to personpower or some gender neutral bs imma hunt you down and kill you xD
Omg that is so cruelpurplepizza117 wrote:
That's why we would put this:King Draza Mihajlovic wrote:
"girlpower!"Feminists would be triggered if they see a female infantry division going against a heavy tank division
_________________________
Girlpower (Trigger Warning)
The amount you can currently use, certainly not in stock, that makes it sound like the women are slaves: 43,192
Women who can currently volunteer to fight for you (don't rush us or it's sexism, check your privilege
13,762 per day
Most women who you can have, if you have more, you're a member of the patriarchy: 223,497
How much women your sexist tank divisions use per day as opposed to the oppressive men:
__________________________
- Units: 3,426 per day
- Total: 3,426 per day
See, you know, that's how I would do it. That way we don't offend any of our good ol' friends... Except realists.
worldwar2history wrote:
Omg that is so cruel
This is a giant leap for mankind!
I quite like this idea.
I know that, I was messing about.aphGermany wrote:
Okay, here's how it is. The term 'manpower' is just a generic term used to describe how many workers/recruits you can use to build a battalion/regiment/brigade/division/corps/army etc. Down with making history politically correct!
Most of the posters have taken this the way it was intended, but some seem to have had a SOH bypass, unless of course you are joking too.
Anyway sorry if I have upset anyone, I didn't mean it. 
Don't apologise!Lizzy wrote:
Anyway sorry if I have upset anyone, I didn't mean it.
I thought it was funny I guess that means I dont have to kill you as muchLizzy wrote:
I know that, I was messing about.aphGermany wrote:
Okay, here's how it is. The term 'manpower' is just a generic term used to describe how many workers/recruits you can use to build a battalion/regiment/brigade/division/corps/army etc. Down with making history politically correct!Most of the posters have taken this the way it was intended, but some seem to have had a SOH bypass, unless of course you are joking too.
Anyway sorry if I have upset anyone, I didn't mean it.
purplepizza117 wrote:
worldwar2history wrote:
Omg that is so cruel
wildL SPQR wrote:
This is a giant leap for mankind!
why are you guys so flippin cruel!!!!Quasi-duck wrote:
I quite like this idea.
Is there some other way you would like us to address this topic?worldwar2history wrote:
why are you guys so flippin cruel!!!!
She sounds like those triggered Feminazi's who got angry there's no women in Battlefield One.
Nah, Lizzy seems like a cool bean. I mean, how many of the users on this thread have been reported by her? I bet not one!Lord Asher wrote:
She sounds like those triggered Feminazi's who got angry there's no women in Battlefield One.
I knowQuasi-duck wrote:
Nah, Lizzy seems like a cool bean. I mean, how many of the users on this thread have been reported by her? I bet not one!Lord Asher wrote:
She sounds like those triggered Feminazi's who got angry there's no women in Battlefield One.
Oh you want reporting? I didn't realise.
I hope this is a joke xDLizzy wrote:
Oh you want reporting? I didn't realise.
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee noooooooooo
What are we going to get in trouble for? "Not politically correct yet realistic jokes about WW2"?
be careful what you say purplepizza..... next thing you know you will have multiple lawsuits on your hand, and if you hire a white, male lawyer, well then there is no saving you
(I am kidding of course, no need to take any of this thread seriously) (I think/hope for the sake of society)
Please log in to post a reply.
