I don't like the idea. Managing morale when you have many provinces is hard sometimes, but it should still be a challenge.
Anyway, with good planning, you can still have good morale even with many provinces. Here is the example.
I've noticed that when you have a lot of provinces (200 or more) the moral decay by distance with capital or the moral don't up.
My proposal is to build a goverment house in a max of 3 houses. This house would have to investigate in secret section from the day 20.
This house have the same function that the capitol except recruit commands.
So i wait your opinions 
Please log in to post a reply.
I don't like the idea. Managing morale when you have many provinces is hard sometimes, but it should still be a challenge.
Anyway, with good planning, you can still have good morale even with many provinces. Here is the example.
Yes it's true. but very dificult, and no all the people can do that.
Paramunac wrote:
I don't like the idea. Managing morale when you have many provinces is hard sometimes, but it should still be a challenge.Anyway, with good planning, you can still have good morale even with many provinces. Here is the example.
I would agree to adding this ONLY if they were permanent structure, and cannot be rebuilt.
When captured, it works at 25% efficiency, similiar to resource territories you capture.

We can talk about the functions of this building... but it can be a good feature!StrangeTalent wrote:
I would agree to adding this ONLY if they were permanent structure, and cannot be rebuilt.When captured, it works at 25% efficiency, similiar to resource territories you capture.

.
It can keep a country with morals with many provinces, this is a bad suggestion.
Building as many as three seems over the top, maybe one.
I personally think the necessary tactics of rebuilding your capital towards the front lines of your invasion is stupid. A capital should be permanent until conquered. I believe fortresses and counter espionage agents should have a morale boosting area effect.
Exactly.for this reason, the suggestion is unnecessary.mfncff wrote:
I personally think the necessary tactics of rebuilding your capital towards the front lines of your invasion is stupid. A capital should be permanent until conquered. I believe fortresses and counter espionage agents should have a morale boosting area effect.
Maybe if you respect an idea we can talk about the idea... but it seems that you don't like the idea for personal things...
So i leave the idea, now you can say that it's unnecessary, or you can keep a country... You win...you have fulfilled your objective
Caesar wrote:
Exactly.for this reason, the suggestion is unnecessary.mfncff wrote:
I personally think the necessary tactics of rebuilding your capital towards the front lines of your invasion is stupid. A capital should be permanent until conquered. I believe fortresses and counter espionage agents should have a morale boosting area effect.
This suggestion is unnecessary.the public enemy wrote:
Maybe if you respect an idea we can talk about the idea... but it seems that you don't like the idea for personal things...So i leave the idea, now you can say that it's unnecessary, or you can keep a country... You win...you have fulfilled your objective
Paramunac wrote:
I don't like the idea.
Apparently, other users of this thread also have the same opinion.CzarHellios wrote:
No.
if other users don't like it does not mean that people like to read and coment.
I am not going to discuss what seems obvious, everyone has their opinion, and the majority view that this suggestion is unnecessary.the public enemy wrote:
if other users don't like it does not mean that people like to read and coment.
I like the idea.
for de moment it seems a tie, 4 people like the idea (someone with conditions) and 4 people who don't likeCaesar wrote:
I am not going to discuss what seems obvious, everyone has their opinion, and the majority view that this suggestion is unnecessary.the public enemy wrote:
if other users don't like it does not mean that people like to read and coment.
So it's no majorityPlease log in to post a reply.