How about hostages?

No. What is the point? When in WWII was there hostages taken rather than POW?

There's no ISIS map, you mean POW right? because I think that has been discussed.

Who said anything about isis?

We do not take hostages or POW's. If there is any survivors, we execute them! We are dictators. We feed our armies first and people last. Taking prisoners means diverting resources to care for them and make sure they cannot get away. We have no use for them.

Mass graves all the way!

ISIS take hostages and behead them on the internet, keep up. I was making a topical joke that obviously went unnoticed.

USA takes hostages too

We are not the USA. Hostages are pointless and promote nothing to the gameplay. They tend to be civies too.

The military might take prisoners not hostages. Here's the definition.

3. One that is under the constraining control of another: "In becoming a mother one becomes a hostage to fortune" (Janna Malamud Smith).

Hehehe hostages eh? Not a bad idea if you explain the details more.

I think not. Taking hostages is a war crime.

Prisoners would be a better idea.

I still don't see how they let me conquer the world easier.

More manpower to produce nuclear weapons Bill, how good is that?

Pft, slave labour? No thanks.

Rehabilitated workers, they see you can wipe them out instantly so they see logic and join your side.

Um, no. I am not in favour of doing that. How do I know I can trust them?

You can use persuasion Bill, a man that can unite the world can persuade a couple of Joe's to fight for him.

No. I am flat out against capturing people and using them as labour.

But if they joined your side you'd be hiring construction specialists. Who said anything about slave labour.

No. This is not a good idea. It would be an incredible waste of time too for the devs.