Hungary in 22 palyer map?!

Hi!

I understand that game balance need some variation on the map.

But so great Romania never in the history. :wallbash Why doesnt make a large playable Austria- Hungary Monarchy, and a little AI Romania. Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia still Ai nations.Its more realistic, and fun still optional, because every nation have a ai neighbour.

10 Replies

The 22 player map is not historical.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

I mentioned this on the FB page, allowing us to play as all countries even the small ones, like Portugal, Ireland, Belgium etc..

I thought it would good to add,


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

I mentioned this on the FB page, allowing us to play as all countries even the small ones, like Portugal, Ireland, Belgium etc..

I thought it would good to add,

That wouldn't work, you'd be at a huge disadvantage and having less than three cities, production would be horribly slow. Also, it would make it harder for players playing as big nations to expand without starting a war with an actual player. If there was a map like that no one would wanna play on it anyway because everyone would be scared that they would get a tiny nation and go inactive.

okey but nor fair, that Hungary isnt a playable nation. Big Hungary with Transylvania and Slovakia is more realistic, because it was real. This big Romania isn't realistic. I understand that, this is a game, and realistic doesnt matter for somebody. But if this vary take the game balance, why doesnt like?

Once again, the map is not historical.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

HellPhire wrote:

That wouldn't work, you'd be at a huge disadvantage and having less than three cities, production would be horribly slow. Also, it would make it harder for players playing as big nations to expand without starting a war with an actual player. If there was a map like that no one would wanna play on it anyway because everyone would be scared that they would get a tiny nation and go inactive.
Free selection, mate. I'd love to play with, say, Belgium/Holland/Switzerland.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Free selection, mate. I'd love to play with, say, Belgium/Holland/Switzerland.
I'd love to get free stats as I rolled you over when you play as Belgium/Holland/Switzerland.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

I'd love to get free stats as I rolled you over when you play as Belgium/Holland/Switzerland.
Wouldn't mind. Bit of a challenge, and since most games are fulla inactives, I woudln't get attacked and I think I could even end up taking big countries too!
The past is a foreign country.

Keyadoria wrote:

Hi!

I understand that game balance need some variation on the map.

But so great Romania never in the history. :wallbash Why doesnt make a large playable Austria- Hungary Monarchy, and a little AI Romania. Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia still Ai nations.Its more realistic, and fun still optional, because every nation have a ai neighbour.

Choose Romania and pretend you're playing as Hungary.

HellPhire wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

I mentioned this on the FB page, allowing us to play as all countries even the small ones, like Portugal, Ireland, Belgium etc..

I thought it would good to add,

That wouldn't work, you'd be at a huge disadvantage and having less than three cities, production would be horribly slow. Also, it would make it harder for players playing as big nations to expand without starting a war with an actual player. If there was a map like that no one would wanna play on it anyway because everyone would be scared that they would get a tiny nation and go inactive.
everybody knows, that, but If I started off as hungry, I could take sloinena then build up,

whats wrong with a challenge like that?

it should not be a priority but It would be very good,

yes some countries would get killed quickly but thats war


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch