because you are indianSuhil Varma wrote:
Hello, I think India should have a separate doctrine
Indian doctrine
Hello, I think India should have a separate doctrine
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
21 Replies
Hey! I think that that would be an awesome idea!
How do you knowUndaunted wrote:
because you are indianSuhil Varma wrote:
Hello, I think India should have a separate doctrine
Me tooMJJS1234 wrote:
Hey! I think that that would be an awesome idea!
Honestly I think countries should have their own doctrine
But that would be too many doctrines to rememberTex_Mex2 wrote:
Honestly I think countries should have their own doctrine
Hmm
What
Each country could have one or two special units. Don't need to remember much. Remember Age of Empires every faction felt similar but they all had special things that made the units unique.Bandersnatch wrote:
But that would be too many doctrines to rememberTex_Mex2 wrote:
Honestly I think countries should have their own doctrine
Maybe one country having a special unit for each country would be a good idea
One new troop for every country sounds like too much work but each doctrine can have its own unique troops, wonderweapon or (Iconic units) for example.
Atomic Cannon for allies. Yes it was real, Atomic Annie was a cannon capable of firing atomic shells (small tactital nukes) at the chosen target but there will be a cooldown timer after each attack and when attacking it can only fire once then the timer starts.
Kamikaze unit or I-400 class sub for pan asian. A huge submarine capable of carrying a small number of fighter aircraft for patrol and attacking other targets.
Kv 6 Super katyusha. A landship with a massive rocket launcher mounted on it capable of inflicting the damage of 3 sp artillery combined also with a cooldown timer so it only attacks one stack at a time but vulnerable to bombers and aerial attacks.
And for axis doctrine there can be so many options. like the Maus super heavy tank, P1000 ratte, Gustav cannon or the v3 Bombardment cannon..
But the player of a country can only build one wonderweapon at a time and cannont start production of another until the existing one is destroyed and all these weapons will only be open to research after a set limit of days say after day 12 or so, not an early game thing..
nice ideas!!!Gloubular wrote:
One new troop for every country sounds like too much work but each doctrine can have its own unique troops, wonderweapon or (Iconic units) for example.Atomic Cannon for allies. Yes it was real, Atomic Annie was a cannon capable of firing atomic shells (small tactital nukes) at the chosen target but there will be a cooldown timer after each attack and when attacking it can only fire once then the timer starts.
Kamikaze unit or I-400 class sub for pan asian. A huge submarine capable of carrying a small number of fighter aircraft for patrol and attacking other targets.
Kv 6 Super katyusha. A landship with a massive rocket launcher mounted on it capable of inflicting the damage of 3 sp artillery combined also with a cooldown timer so it only attacks one stack at a time but vulnerable to bombers and aerial attacks.
And for axis doctrine there can be so many options. like the Maus super heavy tank, P1000 ratte, Gustav cannon or the v3 Bombardment cannon..
But the player of a country can only build one wonderweapon at a time and cannont start production of another until the existing one is destroyed and all these weapons will only be open to research after a set limit of days say after day 12 or so, not an early game thing..
We should have a commonwealth doctrine with British unit models
Then YOU should VOTE the Improvement Party, which seeks to 'Improve' Call of War, and promote FREE and FAIR elections.
VOTE for the Improvement Party! VOTE for a better future!

And a MENA one (with the flag of the Arab Revolt)GeneralJames wrote:
We should have a commonwealth doctrine with British unit models
I have seen a lot of you campaigning on this imaginary "president of forum"... It's been months. 2-3 months to be exact. Everybody doing this nonsense is all-talk, no action.GeneralJames wrote:
We should have a commonwealth doctrine with British unit models
Wow. Love the ideas!
IKRCheckDaFacts! wrote:
I have seen a lot of you campaigning on this imaginary "president of forum"... It's been months. 2-3 months to be exact. Everybody doing this nonsense is all-talk, no action.GeneralJames wrote:
We should have a commonwealth doctrine with British unit models
You can't start a revolution by yourself. Trust me, I would like to change things, but I need do you think Bytro will listen to one voice?CheckDaFacts! wrote:
I have seen a lot of you campaigning on this imaginary "president of forum"... It's been months. 2-3 months to be exact. Everybody doing this nonsense is all-talk, no action.GeneralJames wrote:
We should have a commonwealth doctrine with British unit models
Then YOU should VOTE the Improvement Party, which seeks to 'Improve' Call of War, and promote FREE and FAIR elections.
VOTE for the Improvement Party! VOTE for a better future!

"One voice"...GeneralJames wrote:
You can't start a revolution by yourself. Trust me, I would like to change things, but I need do you think Bytro will listen to one voice?CheckDaFacts! wrote:
I have seen a lot of you campaigning on this imaginary "president of forum"... It's been months. 2-3 months to be exact. Everybody doing this nonsense is all-talk, no action.GeneralJames wrote:
We should have a commonwealth doctrine with British unit models
I have seen everyone of you people doing this thing. It's not just "One voice." It's uselessness. If they won't go as little as getting rid of TheCaptainBlood, they will NOT do anything even if the entire community boycotted bytro.
All talk, no action.
There is only so much one can do to save a ship
Then YOU should VOTE the Improvement Party, which seeks to 'Improve' Call of War, and promote FREE and FAIR elections.
VOTE for the Improvement Party! VOTE for a better future!

Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.