I think it would be a cool idea that after you research motorized infantry to be able to put like 3 infantry together and "make" a motorized infantry, and then put 3 motorized infantry together to make a mechanized infantry. Like have it as an option so if you want to do it you can (but then you lose the strength that the 3 infantry had to make your one motorized infantry. You could always do the same with tanks if people wanted that. 
That makes no sense. How would you get trucks for 3k men by combining all their divisions together? How would a M4 Sherman turn into a Willy's with the crews miraculously becoming foot soldiers?
Combine the hulls of two destroyers to make a catamaran-cuiser.
Tape two fighters together and you get a two-engine medium bomber; four makes a stategic one.
Putting three medium tanks on top of one another, gets you a really heavy one.
How about a battleship on 4 heavy tanks, land-battleship...awesome!
It doesn't work like that, especially the planes. The Americans stuck two P-51's together(I think they were P-51's) and all they got was a heavy fighter.BlackPrince2 wrote:
Combine the hulls of two destroyers to make a catamaran-cuiser.Tape two fighters together and you get a two-engine medium bomber; four makes a stategic one.
Putting three medium tanks on top of one another, gets you a really heavy one.
How about a battleship on 4 heavy tanks, land-battleship...awesome!
tongue-in-cheek
Although it sounds good in concept, I feel this would detract from the economic strategy of the game.
Part of the strategy of Call of War (Supremacy 1942) is decision making: learning when best to construct a unit, how to analyze each changing situation, and adapt to scenarios as they evolve and develop.
To me, it seems fine the way it is.
combine 2 infantry together and what you get? A bigger stack...
I mean sure "sounds like a good idea, let's give the tiger tank 2 barrels or maybe 3!"
Please log in to post a reply.
