Infantry Vs Bombers

PRE_Empire wrote:

Bombers should not be able to be taken down by infantry. Especially in the WW2 era. Bombers are flying 20,000 feet in the air at least. The best gun a infantry might have is a 0.50 cal MG which only shoots 6,000 feet or 2k yards. This is very unrealistic for a aircraft being flown that high to be taken down by infantry unit Especially without any anti aircraft weapons. please change this and make this game more realistic!!! I shouldn't be losing planes to ground troops and same with nukes. Nukes should not be destroyed by any ground troops no matter the amount because they are flying 25,000 feet or higher lets be real here!! No machine gun, MG 50 cal or RPG is going to hit a nuke plane at 25k feet in the air no matter how many guns are shooting at it.

He does have a point....

But since when is Bytro concerned with realism.

The air defense on militia is crazy high. Especially the elite militia. In my opinion, militia should have to be 2 levels higher than the plane to be able to deal reciprocal defense damage. Also why is militia only 4 levels?

Anyway, yes it is very unrealistic that infantry and militia can take down planes so easily.

Totally agree. Infantry shouldn’t reliably shoot down aircraft. Maybe require militia to be two levels higher than planes to retaliate, limit militia anti-air effectiveness, or add dedicated AA units and tech costs for gameplay balance.