We have artillery, rail guns and naval bombers already.Othimos wrote:
Could we get a land based defense against ships that we can see this would be useless against subs unless they attack a city.
5 Apr 2016, 18:38
land based defense against ships
Could we get a land based defense against ships that we can see this would be useless against subs unless they attack a city.
4 Replies
5 Apr 2016, 19:15
It is unnecessary.
Quasi-duck wrote:
We have artillery, rail guns and naval bombers already.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
5 Apr 2016, 22:16
also have rockets.. SP Art
No need..
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
5 Apr 2016, 22:22
Exact.oceanhawk wrote:
also have rockets.. SP ArtNo need..
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
