Leopard 1

Please retired Leopard 1 of research, this is a modern tank, not a 2 word war, put anoder tank on his place, my sugestion is the Panzer III M.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

13 Replies

I'm sorry to say that you are wrong! The Leopard 1 is from 1965. You, my boy, are thinking of the Leopard 2. Loads of the units are from after WWII so there is no point in complaining.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

bravosierrabr wrote:

Please retired Leopard 1 of research, this is a modern tank, not a 2 word war, put anoder tank on his place, my sugestion is the Panzer III M.
The Panzer III is already the first medium tank. The Panzer III M would not fit in with late-war tanks. However to replace the Leopard 1 with something WWII first you'd need to find something that would be a successor to the Panther G.

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

I'm sorry to say that you are wrong! The Leopard 1 is from 1965. You, my boy, are thinking of the Leopard 2. Loads of the units are from after WWII so there is no point in complaining.
The Cold War could be argued to have already begun by 1960.

Fiddy5 wrote:

The Cold War could be argued to have already begun by 1960.
I don't see how that is a viable response to my answer. The Cold War is said to have started in '47.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Though historians can't agree when the cold war exactly started, 1947 is generally accepted as the starting point.

The Dev's used the leopard 1 since its the the only successor to the Panther G that is built in Germany. But it could be replaced by the Panther 2, a tank in early stages of development that would of been a game changer if it was released in time. It would of featured thicker armour than the Panther G, a larger more powerful gun but greater mobility due to improved engine/ transmission. But the big thing was that it would of featured thermal imaging. But the US stole the designs and incorporated them into their tank designs.


Forum Gang Divine Entity

Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.

Nah, man. If we can't have paper Rattes we can't have paper Panthers either.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Well the Panther 2 was more cardboard like the maus, it had some prototypes.


Forum Gang Divine Entity

Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.

The Maus had prototypes too. I said Ratte anyway, not Maus.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Yes the P 1000 Ratte was not even a paper tank it was more of an idea, since there were only drawings and no blueprints. But Ratte would be awesome. But anyway I was saying the Maus was added so why not the Panther 2. Anyway may fave is the P 1500 Monster, that makes the Ratte look tiny with is little cannons, this baby rocks with 800mm cannon and 250 mm of armour


Forum Gang Divine Entity

Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.

The KV-VI would be fun too.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Screw it lets just roll with the P.2000 Gott.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

The Maus had two prototypes, captured by the Russians at the end of WW2, though only one was operational.

The P1500 Monster isn't really a tank, its a self propelled gun. The KV-VI Behemoth is at least a tank, but if we are going down these paper tank routes, they could just enter into an agreement with Games Workshop and add the Baneblade to this game, now that would rock. :D

Ive seen a pic of P2000 tank but I think its a myth, I haven't found any evidence as of yet but i shall keep searching!

Yea the Monster is an SPG, but damn you can't miss with 800mm


Forum Gang Divine Entity

Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch