Alliances have a strict limit on the number of players - no more than 20 players. Many alliances are already filled. They have to remove the good players and refuse to accept new ones. In my opinion it should not happen so harshly. This game is new, and there is a complex process of the formation of new communities - need to provide more freedom for the alliance and expand the limit. Many alliances are formed on the basis of language or national principle, and if a player knows only the language and want to play with compatriots he had no choice but to try to join the alliance, which has the same language. If this alliance is full and you can not accept it, it is likely that it just will not play at all. Such problem in our alliance, and I see that there is a problem in other alliances. I am confident that the expansion of the limit immediately lead to an increase in the activity of team games and then the popularity of the game in general.
Please log in to post a reply.
I rejected 30 applications for entry into our alliance, because it is full. Other than that I was forbidden to create another alliance, if it is a continuation of our alliance. This topic gives the obvious answer to the need for urgent change, but we do not have any reaction to it by the moderators, or those who make the decision. It begins to create irritation
Wow, 30 applications? We totally need bigger alliances.
Try PM them the link.
many times I have sent them messages, and links tooButter Ball Bill wrote:
Try PM them the link.
Darn, my brother e-mailed the devs. I could PM you the e-mail he used if you like. He got a response.
Your brother plays CoW?Butter Ball Bill wrote:
my brother e-mailed the devs
let's try
No, it was in S1914. He tried it but doesn't really play that much.
I've rejected over 20 applications. I rejected like 8 applications in one day. A guy wanted to bring his friends to my alliance and they were good, it was just because I had too many members. Right now, I have 18 members so I hav room to accept people. I'm only selecting the best of the elites since there I'm almost at 20.
They should at least increase the number to like 30- 50 and sort it out later because 20 is unacceptable.
no result so farButter Ball Bill wrote:
Try PM them the link.
Hmm, I don't know what else to do so.
It's been like 3 weeks and still nothing lol
Give the devs some time, I believe they're still in their summer cocoons.Iamyourfather... wrote:
It's been like 3 weeks and still nothing lol
I want to raise this old theme is to draw the attention of the moderators at the problem again
yeah i want to main RA, RAE is not really an alliance. Alone can i fight even without alliance.
Voted 'yes' to this post. I feel 20 is a bit low. Perhaps 50 might be the limit.
Let's see how much applications I'll get in a week, starting now. I have 0 right now and I'll check again September 11th and I'll post a screenshot. This is a issue they should really fix.Sandevot wrote:
I want to raise this old theme is to draw the attention of the moderators at the problem again
I do not want to raise the limit. I and those whom are trusted enough for me to elevate to moderator have the power to admit and dismiss members. We are willing to take in fairly new players on probation but they must prove themselves across a couple of matches that a moderator participates in order to witness their strategy(s).
However, though managing many members is not feasible. I do like the idea that someone had to increase size based on victories (1 victory += 1 new member size, 3 victories += 2 new member size, etc.) However, the converse (removing member size) should not happen. Also, I do not like the idea of using Gold to buy new slots.
If you are full, and you respect another clan, then redirect new applicants to them. If you don't respect them, then redirect new applicants to them ;P
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.I support the proposal Sandevout
Please log in to post a reply.
