I meant as for the reason for having too many countries to players slots. I agree that Greenland is a good option, you need something up there to mess with the north anyway lol.Brando Dilla wrote:
Greenland would have Quebec to the east, no?Carking the 6th wrote:
Probably for some sort of balance reason. They still want 100 playable countries, but donโt want someone having too many weak neighbors, so they comprised with this.
Make Greenland Playable in WaW
In World at War, Greenland has enough room to have more provices, and even be playable. What would everyone think of this addition?
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
53 Replies
Yes. I also donโt understand why New Foundland is only one province.Carking the 6th wrote:
I meant as for the reason for having too many countries to players slots. I agree that Greenland is a good option, you need something up there to mess with the north anyway lol.Brando Dilla wrote:
Greenland would have Quebec to the east, no?Carking the 6th wrote:
Probably for some sort of balance reason. They still want 100 playable countries, but donโt want someone having too many weak neighbors, so they comprised with this.
No one lives there? Only like 20k people.
wrong.Carking the 6th wrote:
No one lives there? Only like 20k people.
56,000 according to Plague Inc.Claudio NVKP wrote:
wrong.Carking the 6th wrote:
No one lives there? Only like 20k people.
57,000 this year.
19,000 in 1940, and 17,000 ten years before (I have always assumed Call of War starts in 1934)
โ Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
โ Lord Kitchener, on tanks
I meant today's date, also, what's plague inc.?
Well seeing as this game takes place in the 30โs to 40โs you count it from there. Also Plague inc is a banger where you craft a disease to wipe out all of humanityโฆ fun. Though these days the population in the game is outdated since itโs now grown to over 8 billion.Claudio NVKP wrote:
I meant today's date, also, what's plague inc.?
hmmmm... I seeCarking the 6th wrote:
Well seeing as this game takes place in the 30โs to 40โs you count it from there. Also Plague inc is a banger where you craft a disease to wipe out all of humanityโฆ fun. Though these days the population in the game is outdated since itโs now grown to over 8 billion.Claudio NVKP wrote:
I meant today's date, also, what's plague inc.?
There is also an extension called cure mode where you fight a disease. It was free for the duration of COVID era. Not anymore sadlyClaudio NVKP wrote:
hmmmm... I seeCarking the 6th wrote:
Well seeing as this game takes place in the 30โs to 40โs you count it from there. Also Plague inc is a banger where you craft a disease to wipe out all of humanityโฆ fun. Though these days the population in the game is outdated since itโs now grown to over 8 billion.Claudio NVKP wrote:
I meant today's date, also, what's plague inc.?

Carking the 6th wrote:
There is also an extension called cure mode where you fight a disease. It was free for the duration of COVID era. Not anymore sadlyClaudio NVKP wrote:
hmmmm... I seeCarking the 6th wrote:
Well seeing as this game takes place in the 30โs to 40โs you count it from there. Also Plague inc is a banger where you craft a disease to wipe out all of humanityโฆ fun. Though these days the population in the game is outdated since itโs now grown to over 8 billion.Claudio NVKP wrote:
I meant today's date, also, what's plague inc.?
edit: oops accidentally sent this and canโt deleteโฆ
56.5k, as of 2015.Carking the 6th wrote:
No one lives there? Only like 20k people.
Greenland's poulation is expected to decline by 18% between now and 2100.
Brando I know but I was talking about the 1930โs to 40โs, 17-18k I think.
Oh okay.Carking the 6th wrote:
Brando I know but I was talking about the 1930โs to 40โs, 17-18k I think.
Well that shouldnt be a problem as we have places like Siberia and the Yakutias.
Those places have hundreds of thousands still, far more than 20kBrando Dilla wrote:
Oh okay.Carking the 6th wrote:
Brando I know but I was talking about the 1930โs to 40โs, 17-18k I think.Well that shouldnt be a problem as we have places like Siberia and the Yakutias.
Real life population has no ingame impact
That is trueBrando Dilla wrote:
Real life population has no ingame impact
The game doesn't have realistic population. The manpower caps are only theoretical anyway, so they should limit world population to 2000 million and, in historic mode, cap countries' starting numbers.Brando Dilla wrote:
Real life population has no ingame impact
โ Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
โ Lord Kitchener, on tanks
I completely agree with historical, they need to fix population. There are definitely people out there who would help, if needed.Lord Crayfish wrote:
The game doesn't have realistic population. The manpower caps are only theoretical anyway, so they should limit world population to 2000 million and, in historic mode, cap countries' starting numbers.Brando Dilla wrote:
Real life population has no ingame impact
They could literally check wikipedia.Carking the 6th wrote:
I completely agree with historical, they need to fix population. There are definitely people out there who would help, if needed.
โ Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
โ Lord Kitchener, on tanks
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.