Marines or sea infantry

I think a special unit that disembarks and/or embarks much faster might be a cool unit. However it would probably need to have lower damage than all the other inf for it to be balanced. Or make it a lot more expensive.

I think production time and resorses would beba way to balance this sence basic training for Marines is tye longest. Also no the allies shouldn't be the only Marines. All doctrine should have them. However I think the doctrine should be more detailed on unita for example allied infantry should be stronger then others (excluding Japan) sence allied especialy america infantry have dozens of stories of there dedication and heroism. Japan would have this too but because they were honorable and would rather die then lose. But to balance it Japan have weak armor units.

yea it can be for all doctrines but allies use much more that unit in history.

Why not let the commandoes already in the game double for marines? Give them reduced unloading time on a coast.

Job done!

NoobNoobTrain wrote:

Why not let the commandoes already in the game double for marines? Give them reduced unloading time on a coast.

Job done!

They are not stealth while embarked

Historically mostly divisional Army units were involved on D-Day not just a special amphibious force.

Marines were more involved on Island Hopping operations in the Pacific Theater.

Most nations then had a Marine force or an equivalent of what the U.S. and British Marines were.

But I do understand and can appreciate that there be a unit that is fast(er) on disembarking. I think making that unit more expensive would be ideal because there would be beachhead forces that were quicker on embark/disembark.

They would require more training and resources to be like this so it would make sense to have them be a more costly unit.