Mercenaries?

I don't officially know if there were mercenaries in WW2, but I know the French Foreign Legion were in ww2 and you COULD classify them as mercenaries. Just thought it would be a good idea, instead of having to spend a day or 2 to deploy a new unit, why not deploy a mercenary? It might be over powered, but you could make it cost a lot of money and make troops who battle with the mercenaries loose morale easier. Just throwing some ideas around :D .

War is the only place where a man truly lives. -George Patton
Veni, Vidi, Vici - Julius Caesar
I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion. - Alexander the Great

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

48 Replies

Pablo22510 wrote:

Good idea, but already too many units, plus paras and marines are comin' out soon.
Well, the mercenaries should be a great update as other units.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Caesar wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Good idea, but already too many units, plus paras and marines are comin' out soon.
Well, the mercenaries should be a great update as other units.
I have changed opinion. Mercenaries weren't used a lot during WW2.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

I have changed opinion. Mercenaries weren't used a lot during WW2.
The mercenaries were used especially in the Pacific and the Russian front.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Caesar wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

I have changed opinion. Mercenaries weren't used a lot during WW2.
The mercenaries were used especially in the Pacific and the Russian front.
Yes, but you can't really call them mercenaries. Mercenaries fought for money; the ones in WW2 didn't.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Caesar wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

I have changed opinion. Mercenaries weren't used a lot during WW2.
The mercenaries were used especially in the Pacific and the Russian front.
Yes, but you can't really call them mercenaries. Mercenaries fought for money; the ones in WW2 didn't.
So they're pretty much militia, which is already a unit.

Even if they did fight for money, the stats would be virtually identical to militia, with different costs. There would be no point.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

Pablo22510 wrote:

Yes, but you can't really call them mercenaries. Mercenaries fought for money; the ones in WW2 didn't.
The Cossacks of the Russian steppes, fought for money.

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

To be fair, a lot of people signed up in the USA for the money. I mean, it wasn't fantastic pay, but if the GI died, their families received $10,000.

Pax Romana Communications Officer

Caesar wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Yes, but you can't really call them mercenaries. Mercenaries fought for money; the ones in WW2 didn't.
The Cossacks of the Russian steppes, fought for money.
I don't think so. They fought with the Germans 'cos they hated Stalin.
The past is a foreign country.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch