Militia

Militia should be much faster to produce. It makes no sense that it takes 2 days to train them and makes them essentially useless. Instead it should take perhaps 12 hours to make them but they would be slightly weaker then they already are this will ensure they are not too OP but usable and wont get spammed

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

35 Replies

Quasi-duck wrote:

Do you think old men and children know how to camouflage like the IDF? Or even the Magic Gang? 'Cause history proves they generally cannot.
hiding in buildings is very difficult...

( nah its not)

right..

even do most militia use guerrilla tactics. Would you like me to explain to you what they are?

They can blend in plain sight as well.


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

hiding in buildings is very difficult...
How do you propose they hide here? Put up a tent?

oceanhawk wrote:

They can blend in plain sight as well.
Really? 'Cuz as far as I know this won't blend in anywhere as it is civilian attire. I give you the Volkssturm!

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

hiding in buildings is very difficult...
How do you propose they hide here? Put up a tent?

oceanhawk wrote:

They can blend in plain sight as well.
Really? 'Cuz as far as I know this won't blend in anywhere as it is civilian attire. I give you the Volkssturm!

Hiding in the mountains isnt that difficult...

also..

Militia dont always look like that!


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Hiding in the mountains isnt that difficult...
Really? Looked a bit awkward in the picture I posted.

oceanhawk wrote:

Militia dont always look like that!
They generally do. Oh, wait, you're right! The Middle East! That is some awesome desert camouflage!

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Hiding in the mountains isnt that difficult...
Really? Looked a bit awkward in the picture I posted.

oceanhawk wrote:

Militia dont always look like that!
They generally do. Oh, wait, you're right! The Middle East! That is some awesome desert camouflage!

They look rather professional to me..

dont think they are militia

Well organised, and equipped..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

They look rather professional to me..
Doesn't mean they are.

oceanhawk wrote:

dont think they are militia
They are.

oceanhawk wrote:

Well organised, and equipped..
Hardly. They have woodland camo in the desert and are using Soviet weaponry, meaning that they are 1. poorly funded and 2. have to lug around heavier guns with heavier ammo. Which means quicker exhaustion and are able to fit in less rounds.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

They look rather professional to me..
Doesn't mean they are.

oceanhawk wrote:

dont think they are militia
They are.

oceanhawk wrote:

Well organised, and equipped..
Hardly. They have woodland camo in the desert and are using Soviet weaponry, meaning that they are 1. poorly funded and 2. have to lug around heavier guns with heavier ammo. Which means quicker exhaustion and are able to fit in less rounds.
That ammo around them is for show..

that 50 round..

They have 47s, by their sides.. not ammo used..

plus AK-47s dont take belts..

they are a professional army,

they are not militia, dont look like ordinary citizens to me..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

That ammo around them is for show..

that 50 round..

They have 47s, by their sides.. not ammo used..

plus AK-47s dont take belts..

Actually, the front men are using really old MG's. Like kinda Bren-ish too.

oceanhawk wrote:

they are a professional army,
Really? Then what country do they serve?

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

That ammo around them is for show..

that 50 round..

They have 47s, by their sides.. not ammo used..

plus AK-47s dont take belts..

Actually, the front men are using really old MG's. Like kinda Bren-ish too.

oceanhawk wrote:

they are a professional army,
Really? Then what country do they serve?
A professional army, doesnt need to serve no country..

think your man there is holding an AK..

http://postimg.org/image/ytigh8v7l/

In the middle behind the front row..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

A professional army, doesnt need to serve no country..
So what army are they serving?

oceanhawk wrote:

think your man there is holding an AK..

postimg.org/image/ytigh8v7l/

In the middle behind the front row..

He does not have a belt of ammo though. Probably could only afford the one magazine.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

A professional army, doesnt need to serve no country..
So what army are they serving?

oceanhawk wrote:

think your man there is holding an AK..

postimg.org/image/ytigh8v7l/

In the middle behind the front row..

He does not have a belt of ammo though. Probably could only afford the one magazine.
They claim to be serving their God..

with al shabaab

true.. the guys behind, dont have the belts, hence they have the AKs..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

They claim to be serving their God..

with al shabaab

So, uh, you are saying that ISIS and Al Qaeda are on par with armies like Russia, Germany and the USA? 'Cause, you know, you did say they were professional and all....

oceanhawk wrote:

hence they have the AKs..
Like I said, heavy and can carry less ammo than say, an M4.

How did a discussion about militia balancing turn into a discussion about ISIS? this is getting really off topic guys.

:D Your guess is as good as any!

Carl Wilson
“Dad, how do soldiers killing each other solve the world's problems?”
― Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995: An Exhibition Catalogue
"Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: 'Do not march on Moscow'… Rule 2 is: 'Do not go fighting with your land armies in China."
Bernard Law Montgomery, British general

Kollin wrote:

How did a discussion about militia balancing turn into a discussion about ISIS? this is getting really off topic guys.
welcome to the CoW forums

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch