Working on it.
more 1.5 maps
currently there sre only 2 1.5 maps. you should make more of these 1.5 maps. maybe a 1.5 historic world war or pacific conquest. 
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
17 Replies
when do you think they will be readyfreezy wrote:
Working on it.

No idea. In the next months we should release more maps over time.RiverWolf74 wrote:
when do you think they will be readyfreezy wrote:
Working on it.
Another suggestion maybe have a map where you both start with a huge navy and a small nation to protect. would be a short round but test out your naval skills and as i like my navy units would be alot of fun
I like the idea of doing a Historic a World War in 1.5, but I think that the Pacific Conquest would tilt heavily in favor of Pan Asian countries due to their increased strength of naval bombers and battleships.RiverWolf74 wrote:
currently there sre only 2 1.5 maps. you should make more of these 1.5 maps. maybe a 1.5 historic world war or pacific conquest.
tilting heavily is an understatment
maybeSeaexplorer99 wrote:
tilting heavily is an understatment
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriersOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
maybeSeaexplorer99 wrote:
tilting heavily is an understatment
isnβt allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriersOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
maybeSeaexplorer99 wrote:
tilting heavily is an understatment
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombesOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
isnβt allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriersOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
maybeSeaexplorer99 wrote:
tilting heavily is an understatment
Tactical Bombers yes, but they wonβt do much against ships, also, pan asian interceptors will kill them before they have a chance to do any harm.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombesOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
isnβt allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriersOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
maybeSeaexplorer99 wrote:
tilting heavily is an understatment
ally also has good naval bombers.OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
Tactical Bombers yes, but they wonβt do much against ships, also, pan asian interceptors will kill them before they have a chance to do any harm.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombesOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
isnβt allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriersOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
maybeSeaexplorer99 wrote:
tilting heavily is an understatment
In what way are they boosted?RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has good naval bombers.OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
Tactical Bombers yes, but they wonβt do much against ships, also, pan asian interceptors will kill them before they have a chance to do any harm.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombesOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
isnβt allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.RiverWolf74 wrote:
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriersOfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:
maybeSeaexplorer99 wrote:
tilting heavily is an understatment
the Asian doctrine beats every other doctrine hands down when it comes to navy theres no if they can defeat there opponents, but when.the only thing that the asian doctrine would have trouble with is land units but can be supplemented with spies
the only doctrine i think that would handle the Asian doctrine is the axis mainly because of subs and hit points.The allied doctrine would develop into a stalemate because of nukes and destroyers
I agree with you about the axis, however allied destroyers would conquer it, the nukes would not be any better for allies, only available earlier. Also, you canβt achieve naval dominance with an army of destroyers.Seaexplorer99 wrote:
the only doctrine i think that would handle the Asian doctrine is the axis mainly because of subs and hit points.The allied doctrine would develop into a stalemate because of nukes and destroyers
However, note that Pan-Asian Naval Bombers are the best, and NB in general are basically the counter to subs with the destroyer. Therefore, added with the boost of carrier and interceptor, it is quite difficult to defeat a strong Pan-Asian navy. Not impossible, but the odds are definitely in the Pan-Asian doctrine's favor.
"Giving up is not an option in war, for it proves one's incapability and incompetence as a leader." - Me (Little Racoon)
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.