Skip to main content

more 1.5 maps

currently there sre only 2 1.5 maps. you should make more of these 1.5 maps. maybe a 1.5 historic world war or pacific conquest. :)

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

17 Replies

Working on it.

freezy wrote:

Working on it.
when do you think they will be ready :)

RiverWolf74 wrote:

freezy wrote:

Working on it.
when do you think they will be ready :)
No idea. In the next months we should release more maps over time.

Another suggestion maybe have a map where you both start with a huge navy and a small nation to protect. would be a short round but test out your naval skills and as i like my navy units would be alot of fun

RiverWolf74 wrote:

currently there sre only 2 1.5 maps. you should make more of these 1.5 maps. maybe a 1.5 historic world war or pacific conquest. :)
I like the idea of doing a Historic a World War in 1.5, but I think that the Pacific Conquest would tilt heavily in favor of Pan Asian countries due to their increased strength of naval bombers and battleships.

tilting heavily is an understatment

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

tilting heavily is an understatment
maybe

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

tilting heavily is an understatment
maybe
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriers

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

tilting heavily is an understatment
maybe
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriers
isn’t allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

tilting heavily is an understatment
maybe
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriers
isn’t allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombes

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

tilting heavily is an understatment
maybe
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriers
isn’t allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombes
Tactical Bombers yes, but they won’t do much against ships, also, pan asian interceptors will kill them before they have a chance to do any harm.

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

tilting heavily is an understatment
maybe
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriers
isn’t allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombes
Tactical Bombers yes, but they won’t do much against ships, also, pan asian interceptors will kill them before they have a chance to do any harm.
ally also has good naval bombers.

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

RiverWolf74 wrote:

OfLittleOrNoConcern wrote:

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

tilting heavily is an understatment
maybe
ally also has some good destroyers and aircraft carriers
isn’t allied aircraft carrier only available earlier, at which time, allies would be busy fighting each other.
ally also has excellent naval and tactical bombes
Tactical Bombers yes, but they won’t do much against ships, also, pan asian interceptors will kill them before they have a chance to do any harm.
ally also has good naval bombers.
In what way are they boosted?

the Asian doctrine beats every other doctrine hands down when it comes to navy theres no if they can defeat there opponents, but when.the only thing that the asian doctrine would have trouble with is land units but can be supplemented with spies

the only doctrine i think that would handle the Asian doctrine is the axis mainly because of subs and hit points.The allied doctrine would develop into a stalemate because of nukes and destroyers

Seaexplorer99 wrote:

the only doctrine i think that would handle the Asian doctrine is the axis mainly because of subs and hit points.The allied doctrine would develop into a stalemate because of nukes and destroyers
I agree with you about the axis, however allied destroyers would conquer it, the nukes would not be any better for allies, only available earlier. Also, you can’t achieve naval dominance with an army of destroyers.

However, note that Pan-Asian Naval Bombers are the best, and NB in general are basically the counter to subs with the destroyer. Therefore, added with the boost of carrier and interceptor, it is quite difficult to defeat a strong Pan-Asian navy. Not impossible, but the odds are definitely in the Pan-Asian doctrine's favor.

"As long as there are sovereign nations possessing great power, war is inevitable." Albert Einstein
"Giving up is not an option in war, for it proves one's incapability and incompetence as a leader." - Me (Little Racoon)

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Play Our Games