More Reward for Small Countries

These "all-in" games have a hard time filling up, since there are a LOT of small countries and few people want to play the 1-city states (even the five-city ones are not going really fast). So yeah I agree, it might increase the incentive.

I wholeheartedly agree! If I won as Switzerland (usually a 1 city nation but not sure on the map you played) it should get 5 times the pay out as a nation that has 5 starting cities regardless if I get the victory as solo or in a coalition. The nation that do not start as 5 city nations face almost insurmountable odds as they will NEVER be able to complete resource or manpower-wise as the 5 city nations and thus should have some major incentive for being played.

I like to play Tibet on HWW, hard mode. I do get 5 cities but start with 7 militia only. Winning is hard and more payout would be lovely but not sure how it would be implemented without exploit.

K.Rokossovski wrote:

These "all-in" games have a hard time filling up, since there are a LOT of small countries and few people want to play the 1-city states (even the five-city ones are not going really fast). So yeah I agree, it might increase the incentive.

wow, that's finally a good idea that I see in the forum, that would increase activity of the playerbase and would not hurt bytro's revenue + would be easy to implement, that's something that I think @freezy might want to check out! (I rarely ping you mr freezy, but I was not wrong beforehand if im correct, so ill take my chance here too)

no need to ping. Yes I agree that difficult countries should get higher rewards. Sadly not high prio enough so no idea if/when something like this could be implemented.

freezy wrote:

no need to ping. Yes I agree that difficult countries should get higher rewards. Sadly not high prio enough so no idea if/when something like this could be implemented.

for example players can join 50 maps from event and they can earn many free gold from them without playing

Rewards for each map is different so team games and their rewards are different.

Players that are inactive collect no gold from any map.

S Schmidt wrote:

Rewards for each map is different so team games and their rewards are different.

Players that are inactive collect no gold from any map.

can player get gold ?

for example at dawn of patriot map choose german side probably they will win and you will get gold

How is that any different than another map? But if you have 10m players that all just look at the game for 10 seconds on one side I suggest that they will get no gold (or very little) as a reward as they will be conquered. If you are looking for a way to do nothing and collect gold I believe that would be considered an exploit and you could have that account closed and all gold rewards forfeited.

S Schmidt wrote:

How is that any different than another map? But if you have 10m players that all just look at the game for 10 seconds on one side I suggest that they will get no gold (or very little) as a reward as they will be conquered. If you are looking for a way to do nothing and collect gold I believe that would be considered an exploit and you could have that account closed and all gold rewards forfeited.

yeah you can get little gold reward by staying alive at 100p map on a small island

but I don't talk about 100p map

I talk about team games

at team games like 50 vs 50 or dawn of patriot there are only 2 coalition not 10 coalition

If your coalition is winner you get same gold , for coalition victories , is your country size or your k/d ratio important ? I don't think so , all of them get equal gold