Name updates

Sounds good.

Hazza Hughz wrote:

I think that in world at war if you conquer all the stated of a country you can change your name to it. This sounds confusing so let me explain. lets say you are volga perm. you invade all the soviet union states (volga nzhny, central russia, North ural etc) when you capture all of them you become russia/ soviet union. Same for africa (you can become north, west east south africa) south america ( brazil argentina or just the whole of south america) North america Mexico, USA Canada ( and if you capture all you are north america. This also applies for asian country. and australia.

If you have any questions ask me, and i think its a good idea so hopefully you agree.

I will stand by adding more ways to name units and countries for the end of my days, therefore I stand by this!

SamPGS_17 wrote:

I agrée actually - this sounds like a really good idea! Maybe the only problem would be at what point are you said to have taken the area? For example you could have all of Africa except one or two provinces, which belong to your coalition member - should you then be called ‘Africa’ or do you need all the provinces?

SamPGS_17 wrote:

Hazza Hughz wrote:

I think that in world at war if you conquer all the stated of a country you can change your name to it. This sounds confusing so let me explain. lets say you are volga perm. you invade all the soviet union states (volga nzhny, central russia, North ural etc) when you capture all of them you become russia/ soviet union. Same for africa (you can become north, west east south africa) south america ( brazil argentina or just the whole of south america) North america Mexico, USA Canada ( and if you capture all you are north america. This also applies for asian country. and australia.

If you have any questions ask me, and i think its a good idea so hopefully you agree.

I agrée actually - this sounds like a really good idea! Maybe the only problem would be at what point are you said to have taken the area? For example you could have all of Africa except one or two provinces, which belong to your coalition member - should you then be called ‘Africa’ or do you need all the provinces?

Brando Dilla wrote:

SamPGS_17 wrote:

Hazza Hughz wrote:

I think that in world at war if you conquer all the stated of a country you can change your name to it. This sounds confusing so let me explain. lets say you are volga perm. you invade all the soviet union states (volga nzhny, central russia, North ural etc) when you capture all of them you become russia/ soviet union. Same for africa (you can become north, west east south africa) south america ( brazil argentina or just the whole of south america) North america Mexico, USA Canada ( and if you capture all you are north america. This also applies for asian country. and australia.

If you have any questions ask me, and i think its a good idea so hopefully you agree.

I agrée actually - this sounds like a really good idea! Maybe the only problem would be at what point are you said to have taken the area? For example you could have all of Africa except one or two provinces, which belong to your coalition member - should you then be called ‘Africa’ or do you need all the provinces?

You did that thing again...

Brando Dilla wrote:

SamPGS_17 wrote:

Hazza Hughz wrote:

I think that in world at war if you conquer all the stated of a country you can change your name to it. This sounds confusing so let me explain. lets say you are volga perm. you invade all the soviet union states (volga nzhny, central russia, North ural etc) when you capture all of them you become russia/ soviet union. Same for africa (you can become north, west east south africa) south america ( brazil argentina or just the whole of south america) North america Mexico, USA Canada ( and if you capture all you are north america. This also applies for asian country. and australia.

If you have any questions ask me, and i think its a good idea so hopefully you agree.

I agrée actually - this sounds like a really good idea! Maybe the only problem would be at what point are you said to have taken the area? For example you could have all of Africa except one or two provinces, which belong to your coalition member - should you then be called ‘Africa’ or do you need all the provinces?

You did that thing again...

That’s the worst punishment imaginable…

Being French…

I am Frénch and I spéak liké this...

Hon Hom Hon Hon!

Hon Hon Hom Hon!

Maybe it should be all provinces captured unless your allies own a little bit. or if your allies have a small bit of, lets say africa, it is called the rebublic of whatever and you are still named africa.

How do we get this in game?

Hazza Hughz wrote:

How do we get this in game?

Do you know any or smth

Freezy is on sometimes.

Can you get him to see this?

@freezy, feel free to check this out.

Next time he comes on, he will probably get this notification and check. It’s up to him to reply if he wants to though.

I have already read it beforehand

The got that same suggestion already in the past. It's a "would be nice" type of thing that doesnt have a high prio.

freezy wrote:

I have already read it beforehand

The got that same suggestion already in the past. It's a "would be nice" type of thing that doesnt have a high prio.

Freezy what do u say? also do u think its a good idea?

Carking the 6th wrote:

@freezy, feel free to check this out.

Next time he comes on, he will probably get this notification and check. It’s up to him to reply if he wants to though.