Naming stuff...

All my respect but most people will either ignore naming or put names to troll enemy

I'd do that.

We could have our own Condor Legion, Big Red One and Black Fleet! Love the idea, you just combined the threads for things before.

I'll edit the name of the thread of something then.

I have read many times various proposals associated with the names: the names of the countries, for presidents, for small vessels, and now even for anti-tank guns.

it is also stupid, as if you were playing chess began to invent names for each pawn. instead, is to spend time thinking up names - better to spend time on inventing a good strategy game. it will bring you more fun.

A lot of younger people play this game, they would find it fun to name their units.

Also, people could 'carry' their favorite units over from game to game e.g. The Harrying Hawks(tac bomber squad) would be carried from game to game by, say, Sandevot and it becomes a feared unit when he uses it and it would get a rep. Rather than people just being known for using certain units, certain units could be associated with them. I could have the Nuking Ninnies, Sandevot could have the Marauding Militia and so on. I bet a load of people would like it.

I bet that every fifth name would violate cultural norms or rules of the game

Most people that stick to games like this, because there are a lot of inactive accounts on s1914 (just look at rank and then the year they started playing), need to have quite a bit of patience and lots of people stick to the rules otherwise the overused banhammer hits them. |I feel that your concerns are quite misplaced because of aforementioned reasons.

Hammer isn't overused, idiots just break the rules too often.

Sandevot wrote:

it is also stupid, as if you were playing chess began to invent names for each pawn. instead, is to spend time thinking up names - better to spend time on inventing a good strategy game. it will bring you more fun.

if you express your ideas, you have to be ready that not everyone will like them. I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I do not want to pass the ideas that can be harmful for comfortable playing those people who are not interesting to read the names and complete biography of every soldier in the army, if he wants to destroy it and move forward. the number of people who are attracted to the historical RRP is a minority

Sandevot wrote:

the number of people who are attracted to the historical RRP is a minority

I think Google translate ruins his posts, he probably sounds much nicer in Russian.

Anyway, you don't have read the unit names, you could just have fun noticing that you crushed Big Red One or maybe shot down every plane in the infamous squadron JG 52.

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

I think Google translate ruins his posts, he probably sounds much nicer in Russian.

Anyway, you don't have read the unit names, you could just have fun noticing that you crushed Big Red One or maybe shot down every plane in the infamous squadron JG 52.

Yes, you are right, Google translator often complicates everything.

I want that, would you understand my position about such changes. If it was originally made in the game, I am ready to accept this. But now, when the game has a lot of other more important aspects require the creation or correction of these proposals sound very strange and untimely. It seems to me that this idea will add more problems than benefits for the players.

Sandevot wrote:

if you express your ideas, you have to be ready that not everyone will like them. I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I do not want to pass the ideas that can be harmful for comfortable playing those people who are not interesting to read the names and complete biography of every soldier in the army, if he wants to destroy it and move forward. the number of people who are attracted to the historical RRP is a minority

Sandevot wrote:

I want that, would you understand my position about such changes. If it was originally made in the game, I am ready to accept this. But now, when the game has a lot of other more important aspects require the creation or correction of these proposals sound very strange and untimely. It seems to me that this idea will add more problems than benefits for the players.

You also realise the Devs and mods actually comment or Sticky threads which have significance to the game's development before using what has accumulated here for update material.

Sandevot wrote:

it is also stupid

comrade dave and spike, please relax ith sandevot. Google Translate doesn't work very well and he is not trying to offend you. I also got angry at hum once, but he is not trying to provoke anybody.

I remember offending my French opposite after using google translate.