I want European allies to be a doctrine and American allies to be a separate one. Why? Because allies are boring. There are so many of them, and it completely ruins the American theatre. North America is extremely boring to play in 100p unless you play Alberta or Mexico, and the American map is completely ruined by this. I think Canada and its provinces (Except Alberta in 100p and British Columbia in the Pacific event) should be European while all states are American. I don't know what the difference between the doctrines would be but I think European allies could use British troops while American allies keep the American troops.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
26 Replies
18 Apr 2021, 05:45
Each country can get different research tree and looks
“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.” “If you win, you need not explain!” “What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?” War is Peace Slavery is Freedom Weakness is Strength
18 Apr 2021, 15:40
GrandEmpire wrote:
Each country can get different research tree and looks
hmm thats sounds like a intresting idea.
when being betrayed betray
18 Apr 2021, 17:49
Tribunate wrote:
Well the issue is with creating a one country doctrine is that all countries would need to get one
Well with the French/Italian doctrine it would be a one country doctrine but with the commonwealth doctrine a ton of countries could have. Also, we have an almost one country doctrine right now, Pan-asian. Even in 1939 historical only 4 countries get it.
Well the issue is with creating a one country doctrine is that all countries would need to get one
Well with the French/Italian doctrine it would be a one country doctrine but with the commonwealth doctrine a ton of countries could have. Also, we have an almost one country doctrine right now, Pan-asian. Even in 1939 historical only 4 countries get it.
french italin doctrine isnt a good idea
when being betrayed betray
18 Apr 2021, 19:10
Larry is god lol lol wrote:
whowh wrote:
Tribunate wrote:
Well the issue is with creating a one country doctrine is that all countries would need to get one
Well with the French/Italian doctrine it would be a one country doctrine but with the commonwealth doctrine a ton of countries could have. Also, we have an almost one country doctrine right now, Pan-asian. Even in 1939 historical only 4 countries get it.
“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.” “If you win, you need not explain!” “What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?” War is Peace Slavery is Freedom Weakness is Strength
