What if we had a unit which is like a flamethrower, but a tank. Flame tanks! Speciality in destroying unarmored unjts and bunker busting.
Please log in to post a reply.
Not necessarily, but it depends on the player. Light armour is a lot faster than heavy armour, so as long as you are active you don't often need to directly engage your light armour against enemy heavy armour.Carking the 6th wrote:
If someone uses mostly light armor, then they are already screwed with the use of heavier armor. Even anti tanks.
You can rely on ranged units or possibly even aircraft to knock out enemy heavy armour, then use your light armour to exploit the breakthroughs.
If you use light armor with ranged units, then of course you’ll do better. I meant the noobs who only use light armored units like LT and AC against experienced players. While I’ve won games with basically just those units and Motorized, they only work on small maps, and don’t last as viable in late game.
That's fair, my bad for missing the context of the thread. New players usually don't have a good grasp on ranged units or aircraft so you're right.
You are right though, light armor is very good to use to rush the enemy while having ranged and planes as support and heavy damage forces.
LT spam anyone? 
#beststrategyever
@Fox-Company sends his regards.
Proven, I used them in the Siam game I am plaayingCarking the 6th wrote:
If you use light armor with ranged units, then of course you’ll do better. I meant the noobs who only use light armored units like LT and AC against experienced players. While I’ve won games with basically just those units and Motorized, they only work on small maps, and don’t last as viable in late game.
They should stop adding units and fix the troll problem
no wonder this joke thread got so many replies
YEAH HELL YEAH WOOOOOO_Pyth0n_ wrote:
LT spam anyone?#beststrategyever
ITS RELEVANT AGAIN
It's relevant in the right context. My last AWC game I played, I had a focus on LTs. They were fairly effective at keeping the enemy's ACs are bay. But the real fun came when the enemy tried to drag the came out for a few extra points and I got to skip level upgrade a bunch of them. I was able to cause all kinds of havoc.Fox-Company wrote:
YEAH HELL YEAH WOOOOOO_Pyth0n_ wrote:
LT spam anyone?#beststrategyever
ITS RELEVANT AGAIN
Ive never had a game where LT's were irrelevant6thDragon wrote:
It's relevant in the right context. My last AWC game I played, I had a focus on LTs. They were fairly effective at keeping the enemy's ACs are bay. But the real fun came when the enemy tried to drag the came out for a few extra points and I got to skip level upgrade a bunch of them. I was able to cause all kinds of havoc.Fox-Company wrote:
YEAH HELL YEAH WOOOOOOITS RELEVANT AGAIN_Pyth0n_ wrote:
LT spam anyone?#beststrategyever
Remember when LTs were considered the worst fast unit?Fox-Company wrote:
Ive never had a game where LT's were irrelevant6thDragon wrote:
It's relevant in the right context. My last AWC game I played, I had a focus on LTs. They were fairly effective at keeping the enemy's ACs are bay. But the real fun came when the enemy tried to drag the came out for a few extra points and I got to skip level upgrade a bunch of them. I was able to cause all kinds of havoc.Fox-Company wrote:
YEAH HELL YEAH WOOOOOOITS RELEVANT AGAIN_Pyth0n_ wrote:
LT spam anyone?#beststrategyever
LAIR, THIS HAS NEVER BEEN THE CASE!_Pyth0n_ wrote:
Remember when LTs were considered the worst fast unit?Fox-Company wrote:
Ive never had a game where LT's were irrelevant6thDragon wrote:
It's relevant in the right context. My last AWC game I played, I had a focus on LTs. They were fairly effective at keeping the enemy's ACs are bay. But the real fun came when the enemy tried to drag the came out for a few extra points and I got to skip level upgrade a bunch of them. I was able to cause all kinds of havoc.Fox-Company wrote:
YEAH HELL YEAH WOOOOOOITS RELEVANT AGAIN_Pyth0n_ wrote:
LT spam anyone?#beststrategyever
I mean…_Pyth0n_ wrote:
Remember when LTs were considered the worst fast unit?Fox-Company wrote:
Ive never had a game where LT's were irrelevant6thDragon wrote:
It's relevant in the right context. My last AWC game I played, I had a focus on LTs. They were fairly effective at keeping the enemy's ACs are bay. But the real fun came when the enemy tried to drag the came out for a few extra points and I got to skip level upgrade a bunch of them. I was able to cause all kinds of havoc.Fox-Company wrote:
YEAH HELL YEAH WOOOOOOITS RELEVANT AGAIN_Pyth0n_ wrote:
LT spam anyone?#beststrategyever
I know what you're thinking.Carking the 6th wrote:
I mean…
But don't say it.
You'll hurt his feelings...
Hurt who's feelings? Light Tanks have always been the best unit._Pyth0n_ wrote:
I know what you're thinking.Carking the 6th wrote:
I mean…But don't say it.
You'll hurt his feelings...
Ehhh…. I me-
Don't-Carking the 6th wrote:
Ehhh…. I me-
Please log in to post a reply.
