If I'm not mistaken, this vehicle would be used more in a role of anti-tank.. not necessarily anti-building.
In which case, we have enough of both!
Self propelled gun that helps the stack attack places with high level fortifications.Stug III
If I'm not mistaken, this vehicle would be used more in a role of anti-tank.. not necessarily anti-building.
In which case, we have enough of both!
agreed.Tribunate wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, this vehicle would be used more in a role of anti-tank.. not necessarily anti-building.In which case, we have enough of both!
it was re-designated the "StuG III" to distinguish the two. Initially, they were intended as armored self-propelled guns providing close fire support to the infantry to destroy bunkers, pillboxes and other entrenched positions
WIkapieda
And even if they add it what would be StugIII in other doctrines?
The isu 152 for comentiren
You mean assault guns. I agree assault guns should be added, they were often used to support infantry units in World War II.
Please log in to post a reply.