Skip to main content

New unit idea!!!!,!,!

New unit idea that I have: ship raiders!

Ship raider can attack ships, like those modern day Somali pirates

unit production cost : 1k food, 2.5 goods

What need to produce : barracks level 3, and an a naval base

:thumbsup: :thumbup: :) ;) :P ^^ :D :rolleyes:

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

65 Replies

ok tnx

β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

Khabarovsk krai wrote:

New unit idea that I have: ship raiders!

Ship raider can attack ships, like those modern day Somali pirates

unit production cost : 1k food, 2.5 goods

What need to produce : barracks level 3, and an a naval base

:thumbsup: :thumbup: :) ;) :P ^^ :D :rolleyes:

Just to bring this forum back to what it was made about.

What about we have patrol boats? They did exist.

They can be like a militia of boats but extremely fast and mainly focused on ships.

whowh wrote:

Khabarovsk krai wrote:

New unit idea that I have: ship raiders!

Ship raider can attack ships, like those modern day Somali pirates

unit production cost : 1k food, 2.5 goods

What need to produce : barracks level 3, and an a naval base

:thumbsup: :thumbup: :) ;) :P ^^ :D :rolleyes:

Just to bring this forum back to what it was made about.

What about we have patrol boats? They did exist.

They can be like a militia of boats but extremely fast and mainly focused on ships.

Like I said to Grand Empire; it still falls under the umbrella of units we have. Low level destroyers have the mobility/ defensive characteristics like a patrol boat. This can also correlate to militia, as their primary use is for defense also.
Ciro702
Moderator
EN Community Support | Bytro Labs Gmbh


Any problems or bugs found? Submit a ticket here! :P
"Having an army is good. Having the insight of an enemy's is better"

you should watch the show : Nazi Megastructures

β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

Ciro702 wrote:

his can also correlate to militia, as their primary use is for defense also.
Just wondering, If destroyers deal more attacking damage than defending damage how do they perform better defensively?

whowh wrote:

Ciro702 wrote:

his can also correlate to militia, as their primary use is for defense also.
Just wondering, If destroyers deal more attacking damage than defending damage how do they perform better defensively?
Because like patrol boats you use them for interception, not for holding a position.

For navy, the "defending damage" is rarely used except vs submarine or if someone wants a fleet "stopped" since well you shoot at the opponent at range.

The problem with adding trouble boat is that :

- They would not really had a purpose, destroyers are already super cheap and patrol boat historically lose vs, well, everything this game has

- Patrol boat can't go on high seas nor cross the Atlantic so the game would have to define "coastal sea" and "high sea", only for one unit,

Not worth it.

after 1.5 I think the addition of heavy fighters would be nice longer range and better defense stats than attack stats because interceptor has become mostly an attack unit not an escort

Can we just change name from Interceptor to fighter

β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

imperialtiger4 wrote:

better defense stats than attack stats
Just wondering how that would work. Don't planes use attack stats when patrolling?

GrandEmpire wrote:

Can we just change name from Interceptor to fighter
Perhaps the heavy fighters could be called 'fighters' while the interceptors are still called interceptors.

Fighters and interceptors arent exactly the same thing.

A fighter is a type of aircraft.

An interceptor is a type of fighter.

Another name for the attack bomber is the "strike fighter."

Another name for the interceptor is "Air Superiority Fighter."

JesterTheSheep wrote:

Another name for the attack bomber is the "strike fighter."
Yeah.

In some languiges strike fighter is called heavy fighter, or fighter-bomber, or bombfighter, huntbomber (in that case mean hunter = fighter) and so on.

Fighter is class of aircrafts wich most diverse kinds of targets. Depend on weoponary of fighter it can be used as ASF or as strike fighter.

@imperialtiger4

no we dont need escort units with higher defencive AA stats then attacking AA stats of ASF. There are 5% till 10 players who call themself "pro" and misuse this for so called exploit of swarming taktik. (so called exploit = legel cheat, with cheat from oxford english, mean use of any edge).

Also if you have no idea about game ballance, please stop post any disballanced suggestions.

Thank you.

Last Warrior wrote:

JesterTheSheep wrote:

Another name for the attack bomber is the "strike fighter."
Yeah.In some languiges strike fighter is called heavy fighter, or fighter-bomber, or bombfighter, huntbomber (in that case mean hunter = fighter) and so on.

Fighter is class of aircrafts wich most diverse kinds of targets. Depend on weoponary of fighter it can be used as ASF or as strike fighter.

@imperialtiger4

no we dont need escort units with higher defencive AA stats then attacking AA stats of ASF. There are 5% till 10 players who call themself "pro" and misuse this for so called exploit of swarming taktik. (so called exploit = legel cheat, with cheat from oxford english, mean use of any edge).

Also if you have no idea about game ballance, please stop post any disballanced suggestions.

Thank you.

wow I did not know I hit a nerve with u pardon me for sharing my idea

imperialtiger4 wrote:

Last Warrior wrote:

JesterTheSheep wrote:

Another name for the attack bomber is the "strike fighter."
Yeah.In some languiges strike fighter is called heavy fighter, or fighter-bomber, or bombfighter, huntbomber (in that case mean hunter = fighter) and so on.Fighter is class of aircrafts wich most diverse kinds of targets. Depend on weoponary of fighter it can be used as ASF or as strike fighter.

@imperialtiger4

no we dont need escort units with higher defencive AA stats then attacking AA stats of ASF. There are 5% till 10 players who call themself "pro" and misuse this for so called exploit of swarming taktik. (so called exploit = legel cheat, with cheat from oxford english, mean use of any edge).

Also if you have no idea about game ballance, please stop post any disballanced suggestions.

Thank you.

wow I did not know I hit a nerve with u pardon me for sharing my idea
You should be very very sorry.

I think by now a new units that should be add is Scort fighters, hvy fighters etc, with high anti air defence capabilities and range similar to strategic bombers.

"Si crees que esto tendrΓ‘ un final feliz, es que no has estado prestando atenciΓ³n"

it wasn't, it was written on may

Comrade genz| Master of Forum Major General

Is fine guys, there's really no time limit regarding threads. Just as long as it doesn't get heated you guys should be good

:)

Ciro702
Moderator
EN Community Support | Bytro Labs Gmbh


Any problems or bugs found? Submit a ticket here! :P
"Having an army is good. Having the insight of an enemy's is better"

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Play Our Games