Dive bombers are already there as attack bombers. Naval bombers aren't flying ships.
New Units Idea
I just got a great idea-Add Dive bombers and Torpedo Bombers
I know Naval Bombers are a thing but does it make sense for flying boats to be able to destroy a ship?
Also how can flying boats (aka naval bombers) even be in Aircraft Carriers?
I am not asking to remove the naval bombers
Just change the name to flying boats and they have incredible range
Damage Values for Dive bomber-Attack damage-7.0
Defensive damage-5.0
Damage Values for Torpedo bombers-Attack Damage-8.5
Defensive Damage-2.5
Changed Damage Values of Flying Boats (now naval bombers but I suggest to change the name)-Attack damage-0.5
Defensive damage-0.5
Also Dive bombers and torpedo bombers have less damage on land units
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
15 Replies
Point-1 Attack bombers are used to damage land units,Not ships
Point-2 I called them flying boats not ships
Why did you call them flying boats? And naval bombers are used to damage ships.
Point-1 Search in google flying boats and you will see a similar picture
Point-2 Does it make sense for those things to do damage in real life they do not even have a place to keep weapons
Point-3 I feel like the options of planes is very limited so an addition of 2 units would be cool
FLYING BOATS ARE NOT naval bombers. Dive bombers ARE naval bombers. 2 more units unnecessaryMiradosh wrote:
Point-1 Search in google flying boats and you will see a similar picturePoint-2 Does it make sense for those things to do damage in real life they do not even have a place to keep weapons
Point-3 I feel like the options of planes is very limited so an addition of 2 units would be cool
Just compare the picture of naval bomber and a flying boat
Dive bombers are waaay smaller
If you look at the option of tanks or infantry there are a lot of units
Dive bombers and Torpedo Bombers were a thing in ww2
What is the problem if they add?
Maybe if they made the naval bomber be more effective against certain ship types and make the new anti ship planes good for others. Like one is better for surface ships while the other is best suited for subs. Just an idea
For subs Yeah you can use the naval bombers works
Several of the "attack bomber" names are actuall dive bombers - for example Ju-87 Stuka and Helldiver. And yeah, they work against ships pretty good as well in-game.
So just think of the pictures of the naval bombers as "torpedo bombers disguised as flying boats" and no new planes are needed.
Although a long-range scout plane (range like a strat, but hardly any damage and much cheaper) might be nice.
interceptors are the default scout plane, but a long-range one might be nice.K.Rokossovski wrote:
Although a long-range scout plane (range like a strat, but hardly any damage and much cheaper) might be nice.
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here!
Yes.RBoi200 wrote:
interceptors are the default scout plane, but a long-range one might be nice.K.Rokossovski wrote:
Although a long-range scout plane (range like a strat, but hardly any damage and much cheaper) might be nice.
I like the ideas how ever itβs not needed.
I mean dive bombers are already cover by the attack bomber and they have decent anti ship values
Now the torpedo bomber would imply the separation of the naval bomber into torpedo bomber for anti ship and naval Patrol boat for anti sub.
I liked this idea honestly but would complicate the air too much
What do i like to se near future it's scort fighter, long range fighters etc.
Having enought range to scort strat bomber and high defence values against planes.
Attack bombers can damage boats. In fact they deal a sizable amount of damage.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.