Nuclear bombers

Well, i'd prefer that rocket interceptors be used for shooting down nuclear weapons.

If you want a god weapon that can't be shot down, try the Nuclear Rocket. Its uber power.

if i see this correctly then reality nuclear bombers couldnt have been shot down in 2nd world war with those planes wich were done in the beginning of the war.

Yeah, its completely stupid to think a ME109 could shoot down a nuclear bomber, but nuclear bombers are glass cannons anyway.

Stick with rockets buddy, nuclear rockets are OP.

me 109 had a service ceiling of 39000 feet.

the b29. the only bomber to carry a nuke had a service ceiling of 32000 feet.

why is it silly for an ME 109 to shoot down a nuke bomber? there are several other fighters who exceeded the ME 109's service ceiling.

While the realism states that its possible and likely would have been done, in terms of the actual game I find is weird to think that an early level fighter could shoot down a nuclear bomber. I'm also not sure of the US nuclear bomber tech tree, so I don't know if the B29 was the final bomber in the tree, or its the B52 or something.

If the game focused on realism I'd be fine with it, but everything can shoot down a Nuclear bomber.

the nuclear bomber was just a plain strategic bomber carrying a nuke bomb, nothing special about it. it was not invented in 1945, the b29 started development in 1938.

I accept that a Heinkel 51 could not attack it but then again we suspend several other aspects of 1940s reality by arming every nation equally and giving each the same military-industrial base.

havent heard anyone complain that their aircraft carriers can only carry 4 airplanes

Have to remember that its a squad of airplanes, just not 1 airplane

Clanpred wrote:

havent heard anyone complain that their aircraft carriers can only carry 4 airplanes

And our 3,000 man divisions

Quasi-duck wrote:

Clanpred wrote:

havent heard anyone complain that their aircraft carriers can only carry 4 airplanes

And our 3,000 man divisions