Nuclear Rockets

I think they should be taken out of the game. They favor the gold players who can afford them.

8 Replies

FV1 wrote:

I think they should be taken out of the game. They favor the gold players who can afford them.
Almost everything favours P2W players. You shouldn't be shocked about that.
TMC

What would shock me is a golder waiting that long to win.

Delmarva pirate-ripping, running and hiding.
Walking contradiction, partly truth and partly fiction, taking every wrong direction on his lonely way back home.

You don't need gold to make nukes... if a game lasts that long, economies are fully developed and top nations are swimming in res. Having the labs ready, a bit of targeted war bond spending, and they're up in no time.

When the enemy is driven back, we have failed. When he is cut off, encircled and dispersed, we have succeeded.
- Alexander Suvorov.

They don't favor anyone, but i want them out of game too. They makes the game insufferable and they weren't used in WW2 except the 2 bombs on Japan which was way too late and too few. Maybe have one tier of nuclear bomb planes and make the research cost like hell. And wth is that nuclear rocket doing in the game?

Torspo2 wrote:

They don't favor anyone, but i want them out of game too. They makes the game insufferable and they weren't used in WW2 except the 2 bombs on Japan which was way too late and too few. Maybe have one tier of nuclear bomb planes and make the research cost like hell. And wth is that nuclear rocket doing in the game?
True, a nuclear rocket makes no sense for a WW2 game.
TMC

The Mister Class wrote:

Torspo2 wrote:

They don't favor anyone, but i want them out of game too. They makes the game insufferable and they weren't used in WW2 except the 2 bombs on Japan which was way too late and too few. Maybe have one tier of nuclear bomb planes and make the research cost like hell. And wth is that nuclear rocket doing in the game?
True, a nuclear rocket makes no sense for a WW2 game.
They don't favor anyone, but i want them out of game too. They makes the game insufferable and they weren't used in WW2 except the 2 bombs on Japan which was way too late and too few. Maybe have one tier of nuclear bomb planes and make the research cost like hell. And wth is that nuclear rocket doing in the game?

Torspo2 wrote:

The Mister Class wrote:

Torspo2 wrote:

They don't favor anyone, but i want them out of game too. They makes the game insufferable and they weren't used in WW2 except the 2 bombs on Japan which was way too late and too few. Maybe have one tier of nuclear bomb planes and make the research cost like hell. And wth is that nuclear rocket doing in the game?
True, a nuclear rocket makes no sense for a WW2 game.
The game lasting that long implies that the timeframe has moved past WW2 and into a post-WW2 technological state. I figure it like in the 1950s when top nations like the USA and USSR could produce such weapons.

Yeah, I'd say the actual thing took like 16-17 days. When you haven't conquered the map by then, you're "slow", but new tech still becomes available.

When the enemy is driven back, we have failed. When he is cut off, encircled and dispersed, we have succeeded.
- Alexander Suvorov.

I thought they aren't available until day 20, and even then it takes a couple days to research them.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch