paratroopers should be able fly from aircraft carriers
at the moment noone use them , they are totally useless , range is too short
8 Replies
27 Oct 2024, 15:56
Historically, which long range paratrooper attacks you know of?
And how many paratrooper attacks from CVs you know of?
Is that none or not a single one?
'Nuf said
STOP THE DUMBIFICATION in favor of P2W & fly-by phone players! SENIOR REFLECTION MANAGER CHIEF EDITOR of The-Only-True-Truth(TM) ⵉⵏⵣⴰⵍⵉⵢⵏ !!ⵢⵉⵏ ⵙⵙⵉⵎⵓⵏ ⴰⵣⴳⴰⵢⴰⵏ!! "We can be wrong & we can know this and still do both" - a random Gen-Z, politician or gaming company CEO
28 Oct 2024, 03:41
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Historically, which long range paratrooper attacks you know of?
And how many paratrooper attacks from CVs you know of?
Is that none or not a single one?
'Nuf said
C-47 planes can fly 2600 km if you ask historically
28 Oct 2024, 07:33
Idk my guess is that the C-47 airplane was to large for the Aircraft Carriers.
28 Oct 2024, 10:58
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Historically, which long range paratrooper attacks you know of?
And how many paratrooper attacks from CVs you know of?
Is that none or not a single one?
'Nuf said
I mean if you're talking realism, practically none of the planes from the tactical bomber tree are carrier-borne. Given how underused paratroopers already are, it would be a pretty convenient and beneficial change.
28 Oct 2024, 13:10
Aceidel wrote:
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Historically, which long range paratrooper attacks you know of?
And how many paratrooper attacks from CVs you know of?
Is that none or not a single one?
'Nuf said
I mean if you're talking realism, practically none of the planes from the tactical bomber tree are carrier-borne. Given how underused paratroopers already are, it would be a pretty convenient and beneficial change.
Ever heard of the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo?
STOP THE DUMBIFICATION in favor of P2W & fly-by phone players! SENIOR REFLECTION MANAGER CHIEF EDITOR of The-Only-True-Truth(TM) ⵉⵏⵣⴰⵍⵉⵢⵏ !!ⵢⵉⵏ ⵙⵙⵉⵎⵓⵏ ⴰⵣⴳⴰⵢⴰⵏ!! "We can be wrong & we can know this and still do both" - a random Gen-Z, politician or gaming company CEO
28 Oct 2024, 23:37 (edited)
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Aceidel wrote:
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Historically, which long range paratrooper attacks you know of?
And how many paratrooper attacks from CVs you know of?
Is that none or not a single one?
'Nuf said
I mean if you're talking realism, practically none of the planes from the tactical bomber tree are carrier-borne. Given how underused paratroopers already are, it would be a pretty convenient and beneficial change.
Ever heard of the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo?
“ Doolittle Raid ” ?
This is the event in which 16 North American B-25 Mitchells belonging to the US Army were launched from the US Navy's aircraft carrier Hornet, CV-8 and were completely lost, isn't it?
Personally, I don't think it's not reasonable.
29 Oct 2024, 15:38
pod_than wrote:
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Aceidel wrote:
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
I mean if you're talking realism, practically none of the planes from the tactical bomber tree are carrier-borne. Given how underused paratroopers already are, it would be a pretty convenient and beneficial change.
Ever heard of the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo?
“ Doolittle Raid ” ?This is the event in which 16 North American B-25 Mitchells belonging to the US Army were launched from the US Navy's aircraft carrier Hornet, CV-8 and were completely lost, isn't it?
Personally, I don't think it's not reasonable.
Thank you for supporting that tactical bombing can be executed from CVs, but that paratrooper invasions should not.
At least, that is what I understood from your reply.
STOP THE DUMBIFICATION in favor of P2W & fly-by phone players! SENIOR REFLECTION MANAGER CHIEF EDITOR of The-Only-True-Truth(TM) ⵉⵏⵣⴰⵍⵉⵢⵏ !!ⵢⵉⵏ ⵙⵙⵉⵎⵓⵏ ⴰⵣⴳⴰⵢⴰⵏ!! "We can be wrong & we can know this and still do both" - a random Gen-Z, politician or gaming company CEO
31 Oct 2024, 10:31
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Aceidel wrote:
vonlettowvorbeck wrote:
Historically, which long range paratrooper attacks you know of?
And how many paratrooper attacks from CVs you know of?
Is that none or not a single one?
'Nuf said
I mean if you're talking realism, practically none of the planes from the tactical bomber tree are carrier-borne. Given how underused paratroopers already are, it would be a pretty convenient and beneficial change.
Ever heard of the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo?
Hence why I said "practically none", that's like 1 one of the planes in the Tactical Bomber tree..
