Petition To Remove the "Resources Reforged" Update

Yes would like to go back to the older resources system. This one is flawed in many ways.

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Bandersnatch wrote:

A majority of units were bad or not popular before the update. I still don't get it.

It is impossible to judge whether you are just trolling or a totally incompetent player or a genius, without knowing your statistics....

But I doubt the latter, because if you can't understand what it means to have a complete layer of the gameplay removed, while all you can say is what you said, well, ....

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Bandersnatch wrote:

A majority of units were bad or not popular before the update. I still don't get it.

It is impossible to judge whether you are just trolling or a totally incompetent player or a genius, without knowing your statistics....

But I doubt the latter, because if you can't understand what it means to have a complete layer of the gameplay removed, while all you can say is what you said, well, ....

I prefer the new resource system because it simplifies the resource scene (due to having fewer resources) which makes it easier to adjust play due to resource shortages and also easier to find and capture enemy cities that produce a resource you need, now any random city has a 33% chance to be the needed resource, compared with 20% before the update.

Bandersnatch wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Bandersnatch wrote:

A majority of units were bad or not popular before the update. I still don't get it.

It is impossible to judge whether you are just trolling or a totally incompetent player or a genius, without knowing your statistics....But I doubt the latter, because if you can't understand what it means to have a complete layer of the gameplay removed, while all you can say is what you said, well, ....

I have been playing for about six months, so I have played before and after the update.

I prefer the new resource system because it simplifies the resource scene (due to having fewer resources) which makes it easier to adjust play due to resource shortages and also easier to find and capture enemy cities that produce a resource you need, now any random city has a 33% chance to be the needed resource, compared with 20% before the update.

Ofc all seasoned players understand that the 'dimwit-class of players' (class description below) do not feel the pain of the dumbification and monetization projects, cleverly dubbed 'upgrades'.

That class of players themselves do not even realize that they are not winning more games because of these 'upgrades' (rather: downgrades).

Definition of the 'Dimwit class':

Players with sometimes even a relative high rank due to hundreds of games played, BUT...

- a victory rate of 1 digit or less,

- K/D below 1

- and loving WBs; some even buying them, bc they can't do without magic.

All this clearly indicating an utter & complete lack of understanding of the game and strategy in general.

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Genius? He reminds me of a 12 year old fly-by.

General Sherman wrote:

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Genius? He reminds me of a 12 year old fly-by.

What is that supposed to mean???

AnonymeggABC1234 wrote:

General Sherman wrote:

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Genius? He reminds me of a 12 year old fly-by.

What is that supposed to mean???

A 12-year old who abandons CoW quickly

Then they might come back at around day 20 to use their War Bonds...

General Sherman wrote:

AnonymeggABC1234 wrote:

General Sherman wrote:

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Genius? He reminds me of a 12 year old fly-by.

What is that supposed to mean???

A 12-year old who abandons CoW quickly

Like all those inactive players on day 4?

Oh, yeah I don’t think many 12 year olds would be into this game

Flies ruin the game because they take up game spots that could potentially be held by active players.

The only instance I can recall flies being helpful is when they take up the countries that nobody wants in the All In round.

General Sherman wrote:

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Genius? He reminds me of a 12 year old fly-by.

What is that supposed to mean???

Let me spell it out...

Part A: 12 yr old => not necessarily a 12 yr old, but a very young player looking for explosions and simple action to quench his ADHD or alike (apparently nowadays 90% of youths between 10 and 25 yrs old suffer from some mental issue, according to our National Health Agency). COW is too complicated, too slow and dull for that type.

Part B: fly-by => player flying in, but not staying and flying away again. Basically someone lured by wrong marketing and not finding what he was looking for OR a 12 yr old with short attention span, coming in and getting bored in 5minutes, so leaves. Thus a player 'flying by' and not staying on.

I am just wondering who I am dealing with that I had to explain that....?

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

General Sherman wrote:

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Genius? He reminds me of a 12 year old fly-by.

What is that supposed to mean???

Really? You not getting it?Let me spell it out...

Part A: 12 yr old => not necessarily a 12 yr old, but a very young player looking for explosions and simple action to quench his ADHD or alike (apparently nowadays 90% of youths between 10 and 25 yrs old suffer from some mental issue, according to our National Health Agency). COW is too complicated, too slow and dull for that type.

Part B: fly-by => player flying in, but not staying and flying away again. Basically someone lured by wrong marketing and not finding what he was looking for OR a 12 yr old with short attention span, coming in and getting bored in 5minutes, so leaves. Thus a player 'flying by' and not staying on.

I am just wondering who I am dealing with that I had to explain that....?

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Flies ruin the game because they take up game spots that could potentially be held by active players.

The only instance I can recall flies being helpful is when they take up the countries that nobody wants in the All In round.

AnonymeggABC1234 wrote:

General Sherman wrote:

AnonymeggABC1234 wrote:

General Sherman wrote:

WilhelmSchultz wrote:

Genius? He reminds me of a 12 year old fly-by.

What is that supposed to mean???

A 12-year old who abandons CoW quickly

Like all those inactive players on day 4?

I mean all of CoW, not just one round

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Bandersnatch wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Bandersnatch wrote:

A majority of units were bad or not popular before the update. I still don't get it.

It is impossible to judge whether you are just trolling or a totally incompetent player or a genius, without knowing your statistics....But I doubt the latter, because if you can't understand what it means to have a complete layer of the gameplay removed, while all you can say is what you said, well, ....

I have been playing for about six months, so I have played before and after the update.I prefer the new resource system because it simplifies the resource scene (due to having fewer resources) which makes it easier to adjust play due to resource shortages and also easier to find and capture enemy cities that produce a resource you need, now any random city has a 33% chance to be the needed resource, compared with 20% before the update.

Why do you avoid giving your player name or rank and statistics?

Ofc all seasoned players understand that the 'dimwit-class of players' (class description below) do not feel the pain of the dumbification and monetization projects, cleverly dubbed 'upgrades'.

That class of players themselves do not even realize that they are not winning more games because of these 'upgrades' (rather: downgrades).

Definition of the 'Dimwit class':

Players with sometimes even a relative high rank due to hundreds of games played, BUT...

- a victory rate of 1 digit or less,

- K/D below 1

- and loving WBs; some even buying them, bc they can't do without magic.

All this clearly indicating an utter & complete lack of understanding of the game and strategy in general.

pvp:

units killed - 50

units lost - 10

ratio - 5.00

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Bandersnatch wrote:

vonlettowvorbeck wrote:

Bandersnatch wrote:

A majority of units were bad or not popular before the update. I still don't get it.

It is impossible to judge whether you are just trolling or a totally incompetent player or a genius, without knowing your statistics....But I doubt the latter, because if you can't understand what it means to have a complete layer of the gameplay removed, while all you can say is what you said, well, ....

I have been playing for about six months, so I have played before and after the update.I prefer the new resource system because it simplifies the resource scene (due to having fewer resources) which makes it easier to adjust play due to resource shortages and also easier to find and capture enemy cities that produce a resource you need, now any random city has a 33% chance to be the needed resource, compared with 20% before the update.

Why do you avoid giving your player name or rank and statistics?

Ofc all seasoned players understand that the 'dimwit-class of players' (class description below) do not feel the pain of the dumbification and monetization projects, cleverly dubbed 'upgrades'.

That class of players themselves do not even realize that they are not winning more games because of these 'upgrades' (rather: downgrades).

Definition of the 'Dimwit class':

Players with sometimes even a relative high rank due to hundreds of games played, BUT...

- a victory rate of 1 digit or less,

- K/D below 1

- and loving WBs; some even buying them, bc they can't do without magic.

All this clearly indicating an utter & complete lack of understanding of the game and strategy in general.

"K/D below 1" i dont have that

"and loving WBs; some even buying them, bc they can't do without magic." i like war bonds but i have never bought them, i do have a high command membership which gives me extra war bonds in my games. and, i was able to win before war bonds were given to me.

That guy just likes to hate on people that don't see eye-to-eye with him.

General Sherman wrote:

That guy just likes to hate on people that don't see eye-to-eye with him.

Bandersnatch just did. Seems OK on that side. That is, if that is 1 game only, than it is ofc not good. That wouldn't say a thing about his overal K/D if that was 1 game. And if it is his overall K/D in 6 months playing....well.... 'nuf said.

But it is something concrete at least.

Now you....

89% of users wish for "Resources Reforged" to be removed.

HenrikSchreiber wrote:

89% of users wish for "Resources Reforged" to be removed.

Note I am open to a different name of the class, as long as it is truthful, but for now I will call it the 'Dimwit-Class'.

These 'Dmwit Class' of players should definitely stay out of discussions of the 'grown-ups' aka 'frequent players' who suffer the consequences of the downgrades. They should realize they have nothing of value to add to the discussion.