Agreed, but tbh rares usually build up over time.
16 Mar 2024, 23:20
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Please set starting RMs back to 15k
They should be 15k just like all the other resources.
10 Replies
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
17 Mar 2024, 01:45
Wait, what? When did they change this?
Aeroplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
17 Mar 2024, 09:58
All the way back when RA was first introduced I thinkLord Crayfish wrote:
Wait, what? When did they change this?
17 Mar 2024, 10:10
It has been years... what, you never noticed??Lord Crayfish wrote:
Wait, what? When did they change this?
21 Mar 2024, 11:14
If that's the way it was I'm fine with it.K.Rokossovski wrote:
It has been years... what, you never noticed??
Aren't they called rare materials for a reason?
Aeroplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
21 Mar 2024, 11:55
But less of them would be used in each unit. You could argue that each single RM is less than a single food, so there is no need to have less.Lord Crayfish wrote:
If that's the way it was I'm fine with it.Aren't they called rare materials for a reason?K.Rokossovski wrote:
It has been years... what, you never noticed??
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
24 Mar 2024, 13:15
It handicaps the use of tacs and ABs early game, and unnecessarily de-incentivises building industry.
28 Mar 2024, 01:09
Isn't that we want? Air stacks get scary about the middle game, but allied tactical bombers would be too OP IMO like this._Pyth0n_ wrote:
It handicaps the use of tacs and ABs early game
Aeroplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
28 Mar 2024, 15:35
Mm true, but it'd be nice to incentivise the use of bombers early game for new players. Good point thoLord Crayfish wrote:
Isn't that we want? Air stacks get scary about the middle game, but allied tactical bombers would be too OP IMO like this._Pyth0n_ wrote:
It handicaps the use of tacs and ABs early game
29 Mar 2024, 00:13
I disagree. Bombers become quite powerful later on and we do not need air power do be unbalanced. I think the same of heavy armoured units. Getting players to make use of their mostly infantry forces at the start and modernise their armies as the game progresses seems better to me._Pyth0n_ wrote:
Mm true, but it'd be nice to incentivise the use of bombers early game for new players. Good point tho
Aeroplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
ā Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
ā Lord Kitchener, on tanks
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
