Pls Add another action/order button

I wish that Commandos had a similar function. I want them to be able to infiltrate Enemy territory and not capture. This would allow for much sneakier game play.

Bonus points if Commandos could move through friendly territory invisibly if ranked high enough.

Leave me room for sneakyness!!!

RookOnzo wrote:

I wish that Commandos had a similar function. I want them to be able to infiltrate Enemy territory and not capture. This would allow for much sneakier game play.

Bonus points if Commandos could move through friendly territory invisibly if ranked high enough.

Leave me room for sneakyness!!!

RookOnzo wrote:

I wish that Commandos had a similar function. I want them to be able to infiltrate Enemy territory and not capture. This would allow for much sneakier game play.

Bonus points if Commandos could move through friendly territory invisibly if ranked high enough.

Leave me room for sneakyness!!!

it should be for militia, commandos and paratroopers

Core provinces return to the coalition member to whom they originally belong when captured from an enemy. That's an automatic function of being in same coalition.

Only time that does not happen is if you capture a players' territories before you two are in same coalition, then you two join same coalition after some of the territories are in each other's hands. Then you'd need to trade the provinces (which you only have limited number of territory trades that you can complete), or one of you leave coalition (better if you get kicked out and then your Cooldown timer is only 24 hours instread of 3 days), WarDec the player and recapture the provinces then after your "Join Coalition" timer expires, rejoin coalition.

Since territories produce 4x as much in RSS in the original owners hand, it's worth it (if playing with alliance members and you know they will stick around till the end of that map).

I am fammiliar with the core functions of the game. What i want to point out is, that i need to do all the mentioned above, like leaving /war/recap/ 24h etc and its unnecessary complication if we just had that simple option. If i want to strategicaly wipe a force, that is stationed in a city i took the province and this can result in many things as we all know (moral etc). Plus, yes some core provinces were brought back to my mate, but also some of them are now mine. Too much complications for something so small to change. It can be another stance if you will, just like that fire order we all give to our armies how to behave in our absence. So i still think this is something to consider and i visualise it as improvement rather than unnecessary.

2 points.

1. Historically - has anything as you're describing it ever actually happened, where a conquering army gave the territory to an ally instead of keeping it for themselves? (Keep in mind the mechanic of limiting player territory transfers is in place to prevent someone joining the game with 3 alts and trading all their provinces to their main account in the first 15 minutes of the game)

2. Do current game mechanics allow for what you are asking to be done (even if it's bit of a round about way... remember BYTRO programmers are the laziest bunch of programmers you've ever come across so if you're asking them to write new code for something you already have the ability to do.... don't waste your breath asking as it will NEVER get done no matter how great the suggestion might be)