Quick Wish List

Where are the super heavy tanks and disc aircraft?

No way. We don't want that Seriously, I don't think they'll introduce it, and honestly, I don't want them.

why do you duplicate the proposals that are already being discussed in other subjects? discussing the same thing in two different subjects is not very convenient. it would be better to have a list of all of the proposals and to link to them, so that, to avoid duplication of offers in the future. something like a simplified navigation section

This thread does appear to be more of a summary of what other threads have been discussing. Like a "Best of" album

I agree with Sandevot that links to threads that do talk about them would be helpful.

I do see two of my own suggestions there, so I'll add the links here:

Deconstruction?

Disengagement

Well, yes, it was a kind of 'Best of', but my intention was to put it all together for people to see.

Now this list a lot of good points, but there are also bad. In order for something to make a list of the "best of the best" must take into account the views of other members

I'm open to suggestions. What would you remove?

You could add a voting system? Then remove the least popular ones after a few weeks

May as well just take off forum leaderboards right off the bat.

Why?

I know I suggested it but it is useless. We can just arrange the members section by what area we want to see who is top in. We don't need much else. Also, one of the staff said that it might lead to spam.

Pablo22510 wrote:

I'm open to suggestions. What would you remove?

I am opposed to some points, but it does not mean that they need to clean up or to start a discussion.

You can make a nice handy list for example:

1

Author: ____

Reference to the theme of the discussion: ____

2

Author: ____

Reference to the theme of the discussion: ____

3

Author: ____

Reference to the theme of the discussion: ____

then we have a suitable structure, a good visualization and able to prevent the duplication.

Pablo22510 wrote:

• Changing Germany's flag to a red one with the Iron Cross (see attachment)
• Secondary routes that don't pass through cities, giving the ability to flank and surround enemy troops stationed in the city. It would also spice up battles on a small scale. Right now it's just using all of your troops to attack the city, and the only way of flanking is taking another province. Small scale battles should be improved

I think it would be better to suggest not that players can change flags.

But to allow them to choose from a preselected set of flags. Set by COW.

I.e. The updated flag of Canada and the current flag if you like modern flags.

This way COW can assure that this will not be abused.

And there is indeed a lack of roads; But I would like more waypoints/routes in general...

Many cities are only connected by one or two roads.

by Aircraft Carrier - done , does that mean it is going to be added ? (hopes so)

Also tank destroyers would be an excellent addition to the armor tree , unlike the current AT unit we have , TDs would be faster , have more HP and more damaging offensively to tanks as well as better stats against inf compared to AT unit. Ofcourse you would expect them to be more expensive

Aircraft carriers are going to be added! Yeeey!

And I believe tank destroyers are on my list.

Tank destroyers had very light armour so they could move fast, maybe they have the same HP as light tanks?

Probably, but they had very good firepower, e.g. Hellcat, Wolverine

Doesn't matter, could've easily one shot them if most German tanks got the sights on it. They are for ambush. not leading an assault.

Yes, but they should be the same as medium tanks. Same firepower as heavy tanks, but armor like light tanks. In the middle, medium tanks.

No, a tank's class is measured by it's weight, armour and size. A tank destroyer isn't even a tank, it is a tracked vehicle or a GMC(Gun Motor Carriage). Some Brit heavy tanks only had a 2 pounder since they couldn't fit the six. The gunn size means nothing. A heavy or medium tank can have guns over 100mm, tank destroyers rarely went over 90, I think.