Yeah, no duh @gacob but that doesn't mean they leave a deadly amount of radiation behind after the blast.
3 May 2016, 18:33
Radiation
Hey!
Today, I did my first attack with a nuclear bomb. Really i love it. My suggestion is add radiaton to the game.
Q: What's radiation?
A: This is a negative effect in the zone of the blast of a nuclear bomb.
Q: What does this negative effect?
A: This negative effect does than the territory never will have poblation(0 production) or units. If an unit join in the territory, the unit will die little by little.
Q: This is possible of see in the map?
A: Yes, a special effect for the territory and an icon would be enough.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
135 Replies
3 May 2016, 20:21
Obviously a bomb that works with radiation expel radiation after of the blast.Quasi-duck wrote:
Yeah, no duh @gacob but that doesn't mean they leave a deadly amount of radiation behind after the blast.
3 May 2016, 20:25
Obvious statement is false, this does not happen. Look at both Hiroshima and and Nagasaki.gacob wrote:
Obviously a bomb that works with radiation expel radiation after of the blast.
3 May 2016, 21:56
cos its better than the rest...Quasi-duck wrote:
Questioner: Are you in favour of democracy?European, American etc.: Yes!
Q: Why?
E, A etc.: Uhhhhhhhhhhh....
didnt work in USSR Or North Korea...
but true.. not many actually think about it..
a lot take it for granulated that we are free of this "communism" horror...
many should be happy that we are... and at least actually know why they say this..
I get what your saying
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
4 May 2016, 13:38
Really? Why?oceanhawk wrote:
cos its better than the rest...
4 May 2016, 16:03
yea cos socialism and commie havent worked ever.....Quasi-duck wrote:
Really? Why?oceanhawk wrote:
cos its better than the rest...
and well.. conservatism makes wealth, opportunity and freedom...
lets not get Off topic.. make a thread and we can argue state facts on why communism doesnt work
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
4 May 2016, 16:10
That isn't democracy. Are you saying Nazi Germany was wealthy, filled with opportunity and freedom?oceanhawk wrote:
conservatism makes wealth, opportunity and freedom
You started it.oceanhawk wrote:
lets not get Off topic
4 May 2016, 16:51
Sorry your right.. not conservatism we were talking about democracy...Quasi-duck wrote:
That isn't democracy. Are you saying Nazi Germany was wealthy, filled with opportunity and freedom?oceanhawk wrote:
conservatism makes wealth, opportunity and freedomYou started it.oceanhawk wrote:
lets not get Off topic
Im willing to admit I was wrong...
democracy is better, cos you wont have the likes of Stalin etc..
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
4 May 2016, 17:06
Ehm, what about Hitler and Mussolini? Hitler was worse than Stalin and Mussolini drove his country into the ground.oceanhawk wrote:
democracy is better, cos you wont have the likes of Stalin etc..
4 May 2016, 18:49
Exactly! With democracy, you won't have dictators doing that.
The past is a foreign country.
4 May 2016, 18:50
What, not not getting voted into power? #TheDonald #IlDuce #DieFuhrerPablo22510 wrote:
Exactly! With democracy, you won't have dictators doing that.
4 May 2016, 18:54
Yes, but with REAL democracy, they would e ousted after 4/5 years, depending where you live in.Quasi-duck wrote:
What, not not getting voted into power? #TheDonald #IlDuce #DieFuhrer
The past is a foreign country.
4 May 2016, 19:01
Then they come back for a second term, use their power over Congress or whatever to change the length of terms and boom dictatorship.Pablo22510 wrote:
Yes, but with REAL democracy, they would e ousted after 4/5 years, depending where you live in.
4 May 2016, 19:02
Maybe. Maybe not. People would revolt. Btw, you are suggesting outright dictatorship is better?Quasi-duck wrote:
Then they come back for a second term, use their power over Congress or whatever to change the length of terms and boom dictatorship.
The past is a foreign country.
4 May 2016, 19:08
America cannot defeat it's own forces, only hopes are that the forces would not follow and unlawful order.Pablo22510 wrote:
People would revolt.
Which, of course, I have complete confidence that they would not follow the order. Yes, I do know I just shot my own foot.
Just where did I say that? BTW look at Singapore.Pablo22510 wrote:
Btw, you are suggesting outright dictatorship is better?
4 May 2016, 19:09
Mind enlightning me?Quasi-duck wrote:
Just where did I say that? BTW look at Singapore.
The past is a foreign country.
4 May 2016, 19:22
They have a benign dictatorship and are doing pretty good.Pablo22510 wrote:
Mind enlightning me?
4 May 2016, 19:23
Ah. True. Well, so did the USSR at the beginning.
The past is a foreign country.
4 May 2016, 19:27
The USSR was genuinely a nice-ish place. Communism puled it from a feudal monarchy into a modern superpower in, what, about 20-30 years?Pablo22510 wrote:
Well, so did the USSR at the beginning.
4 May 2016, 19:28
And sent kulaks into gulags, killed anyone who wasn't Commie, lost 23 million lives during WW2, etc., etc. etc.Quasi-duck wrote:
The USSR was genuinely a nice-ish place. Communism puled it from a feudal monarchy into a modern superpower in, what, about 20-30 years?
The past is a foreign country.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
