Why is China using Japanese troops
Raise War Bonds Cap to 100K
I think that the cap on war bonds should be raised to at least 100k
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
42 Replies
No , 36k magic point is enough for everyoneBandersnatch wrote:
I think that the cap on war bonds should be raised to at least 100k
Says whoUndaunted wrote:
No , 36k magic point is enough for everyoneBandersnatch wrote:
I think that the cap on war bonds should be raised to at least 100k
MeBandersnatch wrote:
Says whoUndaunted wrote:
No , 36k magic point is enough for everyoneBandersnatch wrote:
I think that the cap on war bonds should be raised to at least 100k
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.
Amen brother, the only correct cap for warbonds is zero...and take the cheater booster cards out of the game tooEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.
How would that be fair?Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
I'm not a noobEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
And also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even now
So is this random ass hoe defending a p2w activist?Triangle Guard wrote:
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
So why do you advocate for raising the limit when all you need is sugar daddy's credit card?Bandersnatch wrote:
I'm not a noobEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?And also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even now
Because it gives paying players an unfair advantageEpik Tank wrote:
So is this random ass hoe defending a p2w activist?Triangle Guard wrote:
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?So why do you advocate for raising the limit when all you need is sugar daddy's credit card?Bandersnatch wrote:
I'm not a noobAnd also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even nowEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
paying players always had gold for this , war bond gives advantage to free players so everyone now have magic powerBandersnatch wrote:
Because it gives paying players an unfair advantageEpik Tank wrote:
So is this random ass hoe defending a p2w activist?Triangle Guard wrote:
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?So why do you advocate for raising the limit when all you need is sugar daddy's credit card?Bandersnatch wrote:
I'm not a noobAnd also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even nowEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
when you sent an armored car to behind of front lines , enemy can produce a anti tank in there in 1 min to defend city with war bonds and bye bye to armored car , so if you want to attack a city you need a big stack
or he can destroy your airbase with warbonds before 10 sec to his planes reach to location to destroy your planes
I agree with this thread
What unfair advantage? you only say that because you have your sugar daddy's credit card but you don't know how to use the resources and units correctly. you wouldn't even need this p2w BS if you were actually good at the game. Just admit you're a p2w advocate.Bandersnatch wrote:
Because it gives paying players an unfair advantageEpik Tank wrote:
So is this random ass hoe defending a p2w activist?Triangle Guard wrote:
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?So why do you advocate for raising the limit when all you need is sugar daddy's credit card?Bandersnatch wrote:
I'm not a noobAnd also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even nowEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
But we should remove war bonds because it just makes the game a P2w ahh game
But why should they get more unfair advantagesUndaunted wrote:
paying players always had gold for this , war bond gives advantage to free players so everyone now have magic powerwhen you sent an armored car to behind of front lines , enemy can produce a anti tank in there in 1 min to defend city with war bonds and bye bye to armored car , so if you want to attack a city you need a big stackBandersnatch wrote:
Because it gives paying players an unfair advantageEpik Tank wrote:
So is this random ass hoe defending a p2w activist?Triangle Guard wrote:
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?So why do you advocate for raising the limit when all you need is sugar daddy's credit card?Bandersnatch wrote:
I'm not a noobAnd also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even nowEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?or he can destroy your airbase with warbonds before 10 sec to his planes reach to location to destroy your planes
I don't use money to buy gold only high commandEpik Tank wrote:
What unfair advantage? you only say that because you have your sugar daddy's credit card but you don't know how to use the resources and units correctly. you wouldn't even need this p2w BS if you were actually good at the game. Just admit you're a p2w advocate.Bandersnatch wrote:
Because it gives paying players an unfair advantageEpik Tank wrote:
So is this random ass hoe defending a p2w activist?Triangle Guard wrote:
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?So why do you advocate for raising the limit when all you need is sugar daddy's credit card?Bandersnatch wrote:
I'm not a noobAnd also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even nowEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
they pay too much money to game do you think really they care 36k war bonds ?Bandersnatch wrote:
But why should they get more unfair advantagesUndaunted wrote:
paying players always had gold for this , war bond gives advantage to free players so everyone now have magic powerwhen you sent an armored car to behind of front lines , enemy can produce a anti tank in there in 1 min to defend city with war bonds and bye bye to armored car , so if you want to attack a city you need a big stackor he can destroy your airbase with warbonds before 10 sec to his planes reach to location to destroy your planesBandersnatch wrote:
Because it gives paying players an unfair advantageEpik Tank wrote:
So is this random ass hoe defending a p2w activist?Triangle Guard wrote:
so is little bro calling the most tact and experienced players sh*t? Cause thats what it sound like?Epik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?So why do you advocate for raising the limit when all you need is sugar daddy's credit card?Bandersnatch wrote:
I'm not a noobAnd also peple can already buy over the limit with real gold, so peple can have over 36k at once even nowEpik Tank wrote:
How would that be fair?It'd give brainless noobs like (seemingly) you an unfair advantage and ability to just buy buy buy stuff and never actually learn to play. War bonds should have never been a resource to begin with. If you support this stupidity it says a lot about what kind of player you are.Bandersnatch wrote:
But now that war bonds are in the game they should raise the cap to make it more fairEpik Tank wrote:
Because war bonds should have never even been a resource in the first place.Why the hell did they remove goods and rare materials for a stupid p2w resource? Why are you so in favor of being able to buy yourself a win? That's not strategy, that's stupidity.Bandersnatch wrote:
You support the 36K cap? Why are you so in favor of it?
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.