Research Radar!

14 Feb 2018, 02:27

I thought of an idea. A radar building, as in WW2, Britain used it in the Battle of Britain, which helped them out a lot.

This radar building( must be researched) would tiers, and those tiers would improve the range of it.

The reason is that it could detect incoming troops from far away without having to patrol every area.

The benefits of it is that you wouldn't have to risk unfriendly relations by patrolling using aircraft.

The top tier building would have a maximum range of maybe between a level 7 tactical bomber's attack range and a strategic bomber's maximum range, and it would have a recharge of about 2-4 hours between cycles of radar so it wouldn't be to overpowered, to give attackers the ability to keep attacking with stealth.

This building should be able to be researched around day 18-24., with max tier research at day 40.

Suggestions can be left below about this, feel free to comment on it.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

65 Replies

14 Feb 2018, 02:48

If it used maybe oil or rare materials like a reactor then yes but the range I think would need to be shorter as that would've been unrealistic at the time for it to reach that far

14 Feb 2018, 02:59

This is better than paratroopers!

Forum Gang Mascot
Girls game too

dxcalc.com/cow

14 Feb 2018, 13:49

This has been suggested before, and it is a good idea.

14 Feb 2018, 18:46

I think a radar is a good idea, as long as it doesn't detect incoming troops. It should detect planes and ships with an ever-increasing range, but not land troops.

Paratroopers are still a better idea, though.

The past is a foreign country.

14 Feb 2018, 21:15

Pablo22510 wrote:
I think a radar is a good idea, as long as it doesn't detect incoming troops. It should detect planes and ships with an ever-increasing range, but not land troops.
Paratroopers are still a better idea, though.

actually I like his idea but I don't know

I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it

If you know what I mean,

Something in my head but I can't explain it

14 Feb 2018, 21:43

Lite76 wrote:
actually I like his idea but I don't know
I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it
If you know what I mean,
Something in my head but I can't explain it

I don't know what you mean, it can detect planes and ships but not land units. I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.

14 Feb 2018, 21:49

Quasi-duck wrote:
I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.

Definitely not. Forgot to mention that.

The past is a foreign country.

14 Feb 2018, 22:33

Quasi-duck wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
actually I like his idea but I don't know
I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it
If you know what I mean,
Something in my head but I can't explain it
I don't know what you mean, it can detect planes and ships but not land units. I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.

It would detect air and most naval units. Maybe nuclear ships can be masked from radar?

14 Feb 2018, 22:35 (edited)

Quasi-duck wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
actually I like his idea but I don't know
I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it
If you know what I mean,
Something in my head but I can't explain it
I don't know what you mean, it can detect planes and ships but not land units. I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.

I mean they will over do it

Like you need to setup a distance for it

And overdoing it or they will under do it

It must be perfect for it

And also the price of it and the material it will cost you

And that set

the ships and planes and don't detect land,,,

I'm with you in it

And if you read my poll I think you'll understand what I meant ☺

14 Feb 2018, 22:39

Lite76 wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
actually I like his idea but I don't know
I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it
If you know what I mean,
Something in my head but I can't explain it
I don't know what you mean, it can detect planes and ships but not land units. I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.
I mean they will over do itLike you need to setup a distance for it
And overdoing it or they will under do it
It must be perfect for it
And also the price of it and the material it will cost you
And that set
the ships and planes and don't detect land,,,
I'm with you in it

It would need to be good but not overpowered. It would maybe run on a mix of oil and rare materials, or something like that. The building could just be like a radar dish on the map.

To keep it balanced, it will have a recharge time of about 4 hours per cycle, so people whom want to attack can have a chance to do so.

14 Feb 2018, 22:44

xXCooksterXx wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
actually I like his idea but I don't know
I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it
If you know what I mean,
Something in my head but I can't explain it
I don't know what you mean, it can detect planes and ships but not land units. I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.
I mean they will over do itLike you need to setup a distance for itAnd overdoing it or they will under do it
It must be perfect for it
And also the price of it and the material it will cost you
And that set
the ships and planes and don't detect land,,,
I'm with you in it
It would need to be good but not overpowered. It would maybe run on a mix of oil and rare materials, or something like that. The building could just be like a radar dish on the map.To keep it balanced, it will have a recharge time of about 4 hours per cycle, so people whom want to attack can have a chance to do so.

you really think about it

And I think you convince me

Good luck

14 Feb 2018, 23:03

Lite76 wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
actually I like his idea but I don't know
I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it
If you know what I mean,
Something in my head but I can't explain it
I don't know what you mean, it can detect planes and ships but not land units. I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.
I mean they will over do itLike you need to setup a distance for itAnd overdoing it or they will under do itIt must be perfect for it
And also the price of it and the material it will cost you
And that set
the ships and planes and don't detect land,,,
I'm with you in it
It would need to be good but not overpowered. It would maybe run on a mix of oil and rare materials, or something like that. The building could just be like a radar dish on the map.To keep it balanced, it will have a recharge time of about 4 hours per cycle, so people whom want to attack can have a chance to do so.
you really think about it And I think you convince me
Good luck

Almost there, soon we will have broken the record of quotes of quotes of quotes...

Forum Gang Mascot
Girls game too

dxcalc.com/cow

14 Feb 2018, 23:46

injinji wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
Lite76 wrote:
actually I like his idea but I don't know
I'm scared that if they do it, they over do it
If you know what I mean,
Something in my head but I can't explain it
I don't know what you mean, it can detect planes and ships but not land units. I would also recommend that it doesn't detect subs either.
I mean they will over do itLike you need to setup a distance for itAnd overdoing it or they will under do itIt must be perfect for itAnd also the price of it and the material it will cost you
And that set
the ships and planes and don't detect land,,,
I'm with you in it
It would need to be good but not overpowered. It would maybe run on a mix of oil and rare materials, or something like that. The building could just be like a radar dish on the map.To keep it balanced, it will have a recharge time of about 4 hours per cycle, so people whom want to attack can have a chance to do so.
you really think about it And I think you convince meGood luck

Almost there, soon we will have broken the record of quotes of quotes of quotes...

Almost there..

Do it for radar

15 Feb 2018, 00:09

xXCooksterXx wrote:
Maybe nuclear ships can be masked from radar?

Why? If anything those are easiest to detect because they're so big.

Lite76 wrote:
I mean they will over do it
Like you need to setup a distance for it
And overdoing it or they will under do it
It must be perfect for it
And also the price of it and the material it will cost you
And that set

Ah yeah that would not be good.

15 Feb 2018, 00:22

Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Maybe nuclear ships can be masked from radar?
Why? If anything those are easiest to detect because they're so big.Ah yeah that would not be good.

Because then that makes nuclear ships easy targets, and not worth researching period.

15 Feb 2018, 00:25

xXCooksterXx wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Maybe nuclear ships can be masked from radar?
Why? If anything those are easiest to detect because they're so big.Ah yeah that would not be good.
Because then that makes nuclear ships easy targets, and not worth researching period.

Well they are easy targets, that is why you give them adequate naval support.

15 Feb 2018, 00:28

Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Maybe nuclear ships can be masked from radar?
Why? If anything those are easiest to detect because they're so big.Ah yeah that would not be good.
Because then that makes nuclear ships easy targets, and not worth researching period.
Well they are easy targets, that is why you give them adequate naval support.

And this is where I delve into the deepest suggestions and say in this case we need a nuclear cruiser for AA defense

15 Feb 2018, 00:33

xXCooksterXx wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Maybe nuclear ships can be masked from radar?
Why? If anything those are easiest to detect because they're so big.Ah yeah that would not be good.
Because then that makes nuclear ships easy targets, and not worth researching period.
Well they are easy targets, that is why you give them adequate naval support.
And this is where I delve into the deepest suggestions and say in this case we need a nuclear cruiser for AA defense

Lol just build a CVN and use fighters.

15 Feb 2018, 00:35

Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
xXCooksterXx wrote:
Maybe nuclear ships can be masked from radar?
Why? If anything those are easiest to detect because they're so big.Ah yeah that would not be good.
Because then that makes nuclear ships easy targets, and not worth researching period.
Well they are easy targets, that is why you give them adequate naval support.
And this is where I delve into the deepest suggestions and say in this case we need a nuclear cruiser for AA defense
Lol just build a CVN and use fighters.

Or convince a developer to have nuclear bombers on carriers so you can nuke airports. Problem solved

15 Feb 2018, 01:12

Valiant effort,

but expectations are way too high.

the code is 'locked' into traps like: Naval Warships may only fire salvos when they are dead in the water, anchors tight.

the chances of adding, and correctly implementing any realistic, WWII technologies, and combat realism are negligible.

Bystro will give you nuclear subs, with ICBMs, but cannot manage to implement 90mm AAA with SCR-584 radar direction.

Need I point out which technology came first?

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions